Modelling habitat suitability for black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) in heterogeneous landscapes

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 88, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 157-165

  Boroski, Brian B ^a,b   Barrett, Reginald H ^b   Timossi, Irene C ^b   Kie, John G ^a,c  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

GIS; Habitat suitability; Modelling; Odocoileus hemionus columbianus

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; CERVIDAE; ODOCOILEUS; ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS COLUMBIANUS; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0030294693     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03821-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Airola, D.A., 1980a. California wildlife habitat relationships program, northeast interior zone. Reptiles and amphibians. Vol. II. USDA, Forest Service, Lassen National Forest, Susanville, CA, 137 pp.
2. Airola, D.A., 1980b. California wildlife habitat relationships program, northeast interior zone. Birds. Vol. III. USDA, Forest Service, Lassen National Forest, Susanville, CA, 590 pp.
3. Airola, D.A., 1980c. California wildlife habitat relationships program, northeast interior zone. Mammals. Vol. IV. USDA, Forest Service, Lassen National Forest, Susanville, CA, 255 pp.
4. Airola, D.A., 1988. A guide to the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 74 pp.
5. Boroski, B.B. and McLaughlin, P.L., 1994. An efficient technique for capturing swimming deer. Calif. Fish Game, 80: 36-43.
6. Bradu, D. and Mundlak, Y., 1970. Estimation in lognormal linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 65: 198-211.
7. Brown, G.K. and Fox, L., 1992. Digital classification of thematic mapper imagery for recognition of wildlife habitat characteristics. Proc. 1992 ASPRS/ACSM Convention, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
8. Burton, T.S. and Monroe, G.S., 1983. Weaverville deer herd management plan. California Department of Fish and Game, Redding, CA, 83 pp.
9. Cleveland, W.S., 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74: 829-836.
10. Davis, L.S. and Barrett, R.H., 1993. Spatial integration of wildlife habitat analysis with long-term forest planning over multiple-owner landscapes. In: D.C. Le Master and R.A, Sedjo (Editors), Proc. Modeling Sustainable Forest Ecosystems, Washington DC, pp. 143-154.
11. Dunaway, D., 1964. A habitat management plan for the Weaverville deer herd unit. USDA Forest Service, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 12 pp.
12. Dunaway, D., 1965. A habitat management plan for the New River deer herd unit. USDA Forest Service, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 17 pp.
13. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M., 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley, New York.
14. Grenfell, W.E., Jr., Salwasser, H. and Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr., 1982. The California wildlife/fish habitat relationships system. Cal-Nev Wildl. Trans. 1982, pp. 27-33. .
15. Hurley, J.F. and Asrow, E.S., 1980. Western Sierra wildlife/habitat relationships computer user manual. WHR Appl. Note 80-1, USDA, Forest Service, Pacific SW Region, San Francisco, CA, 155 pp.
16. Larkin, R.P. and Halkin, D., 1994. A review of software packages for estimating animal home ranges. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 22: 274-287.
17. Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr., 1982. Wildlife habitat relationships program, northeast interior zone. Introduction and species-habitat relationships matrix, Vol. I. USDA Forest Service, Pacific SW Region, San Francisco, CA, 161 pp.
18. Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr., Dedon, M.F. and Airola, D.A., 1982. California wildlife habitat relationships program: northeast interior zone. Computer user's manual, Vol. V. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific SW Region, San Francisco, CA, 25 pp.
19. Loft, E.R. and Menke, J.W., 1984. Deer use and habitat characteristics of transmission-line corridors in a Douglas-fir forest. J. Wildl. Manage., 48: 1311-1316.
20. Loft, E.R., Menke, J.W. and Burton, T.S., 1984. Seasonal movements and summer habitats of female black-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage., 48: 1317-1325.
21. Manly, B.F.J., 1992. The Design and Analysis of Research Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Marcot, B.G., 1979. California wildlife relationships program: north coast/Cascades zone. USDA, Forest Service, Six Rivers National Forest, Eureka, CA, 4 vols.
23. Mayer, K.E. and Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr., 1988. A guide to the wildlife habitats of California. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 166 pp.
24. McCullough, D.R., 1975. Modification of the Clover deer trap. Calif. Fish Game, 61: 242-244.
25. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., 1994. Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, Version 2.0, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 67 pp.
26. Osaki, S.K., 1980. Wildlife habitat relationships: Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. USDA, Forest Service, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 150 pp.
27. Peterson, G.E., 1983. Structural and vegetative components of deer summer range in the Klamath Mountains. M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis, 44 pp.
28. Schoener, T.W., 1981. An empirically based estimate of home range. Theor. Popul. Biol., 20: 281-325.
29. Shimamoto, K. and Airola, D.A., 1981. Fish and wildlife habitat capability models and special habitat criteria for the northeast interior zone forests. USDA, Forest Service, Modoc National Forest, Alturas, CA, 260 pp.
30. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, release 6.03. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1028 pp.
31. Stumpf, K.A. and Koltun, J.M., 1992. Rule based aggregation of raster image classifications into vector GIS databases with five-and forty-acre minimum size mapping units. Proc. 1992 ASPRS/ACSM Convention, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
32. Thomas, J.W., 1979. Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA, Forest Service, Agricultural Handbook No. 553, Washington, DC, 512 pp.
33. Timossi, I.C., Sweet, A. and Dedon, M., 1989. Microcomputer user's manual for the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships Database System. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 13 pp.
34. Timossi, I.C., Sweet, A., Dedon, M. and Barrett, R.H., 1994. User's manual for the California Habitat Relationships microcomputer database, Version 5.0. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 77 pp.
35. Turner, M.G., O'Neill, R.V., Gardner, R.H. and Milne, B.T., 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol., 3: 153-162.
36. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 1975. Deer loss compensation program resulting from Trinity River Division, Central Valley Project, California: A report to the Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Task Force. USDA Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, 30 pp.
37. Vemer, J. and Boss, A.S., 1980. California wildlife and their habitats: western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-37, USDA, Forest Service, 439 pp.
38. Wallmo, O.C., 1991. Mule and Black-tailed Deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
39. White, G.C. and Garrott, R.A., 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radiotracking Data. Academic Press, New York.
40. Wiens, J.A., 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 81-129.
41. Wiens J.A. Spatial scaling in ecology Funct. Ecol. 3 1989 385-397.
42. Wilkinson, L., Hill, M.A., Welna, J.P. and Birkenbeuel, G.K., 1992. SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics, Ver. 5. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL, 750 pp.
43. Worton, B.J., 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies Ecology 70: 164-168.
44. Zar J.H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.