Duration of trip-making activities by men and women: A survival analysis

Transportation

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 353-371

  Niemeier, Debbie A ^a   Morita, June G ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Activity duration; Survival analysis; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGIONAL PLANNING;

ACTIVITY DURATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENERAL COMPARISON; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR; TRIP DURATION; URBAN TRAVEL;

EID: 0030292274     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Clarke M, Dix M, Jones P & Heggin I (1981) Some recent developments in activity travel analysis. TRR 794, 1-8.
2. Cox D (1972) Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 34: 187-202.
3. Damm D (1983) Theory and empirical results: A comparison of recent activity based research. In: Carpenter S & Jones P (eds) New Approaches to Analysing Travel Behavior. Gower, Aldershot.
4. Erickson J (1977) An analysis of the journey for women. Social Problems 24.
5. Fagnani J (1991) Daily commuting time: The stakes for working mothers in France. Transportation Research Record, No. 1135.
6. Godard X (1983) Presentation of results of the dijon survey: Linkages between activity and mobility. In: Carpenter S & Jones PM (eds) In New Approaches to Analysing Travel Behavior. Gower, Aldershot.
7. Golob JM & Golob TF (1983) Classification of approaches to travel-behavior analysis, Travel Analysis Methods for the 1980's, Special Report 201. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
8. Gordon P, Kumar A & Richardson H (1988) Beyond the journey to work. Transportation Research A 22A: 419-426.
9. Gordon P, Kumar A & Richardson H (1989) Gender differences in metropolitan travel behavior. Regional Studies 23.6.
10. Hamed M & Manering F (1993) Modeling travelers; post-work activity involvement: Toward a new methodology. Forthcoming in Transportation Science.
11. Hayghe H (1990) Family members in the workforce. Monthly Labor Review March: 13-19.
12. Hamed M & Mannering F (1992b) A note on commuters' activity duration and the efficiency of the proportional hazards model. Submitted to Transportation.
13. Hanson S (1980) The importance of the multi-purpose journey to work in urban travel behavior. Transportation 9: 229-248.
14. Hanson S & Hanson P (1981) The travel activity patterns of urban residents: Dimensions and relationships to socioeconomic characteristics. Economic Geography 57: 332-347.
15. Hanson & Johnston (1985) Gender differences in work-trip length: Explanations and implications. Urban Geography 6(3).
16. Hochschild A (1989) The Second Shift. Viking Peguin, New York, New York.
17. Johnston-Anumonwo I (1989) Journey to work: A comparison of characteristics of single and married parents. Specialized Transportation Planning and Practice 3(3).
18. Kalbfleish J & Prentice R (1980) The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley, New York.
19. Kaplan E & Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53: 457-481.
20. Kitamura R (1984) Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice. Transportation Research B 18B(1): 67-81.
21. Kitamura R & Kermanshah M (1983) Identifying time and history dependencies of activity choice. Transportation Research Record 994, 22-30.
22. Kostynivk L, Kitamura R & Goulias K (1989) Mobility of single parents: What do the trip records show. Specialized Transportation Planning and Practice 3(3).
23. Kostyniuk L & Kitamura R (1982) Life cycle and household time-space paths: Empirical Investigation. TRR 879, 29-32.
24. Madden JF (1981) Why women work closer to home. Urban Studies 18.
25. Mannering F, Murakami E & Kim S-G (1992) Model of travelers' activity choice and homestay duration: Analysis of functional form and temporal stability. Sumitted to Transportation.
26. Murakami E & Watterson W (1992) Developing a Household Travel Panel Survey for the Puget Sound Region, Preprint, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1991.
27. Oakes D (1977) The asympotic information in censored survival data. Biometrika 64: 441-448.
28. Oster C (1979) Second role of the work trip - visiting nonwork destinations. TRR 728, 78-81.
29. Pas E & Koppelman F (1986) An examination of the determinations of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior. Transportation 14: 3-20.
30. Pas E (1984) The effect of selected sociodemographic characteristics on daily travel activity behavior. Environment and Planning 16: 570-529.
31. Pisarski Alan E (1991a) Travel Demand in the 1990's. A look at Demographic Changes that Will Affect Highway Transportation in the Decade (p 5) Highway Users Federation, Washington, DC.
32. Pisarski Alan E (1991b) Main Themes in Socio-Economic Trends Affecting Metropolitan Transportation Planning (pp 43-46). Highway Users Federation, Washington, DC.
33. Preston V, McLafferty S & Hamilton E (1991) Gender, race and commuting: The impact of family status. National Science Foundation Geography and Regional Science Program, No. SES-9012916, Washington, DC.
34. Preston V, McLafferty S & Hamilton E (1992) S-PLUS for DOS, User's Manual, Vol 2, Statistical Sciences, Inc. Seattle, Washington.
35. White JM (1986) Six differences in urban commuting patterns. The American Economic Review 76(2): 368-372.