Dayside moving auroral transients related to LLBL dynamics

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 23, Issue 22, 1996, Pages 3247-3250

  Moen, J ^a   Evans, D ^b   Carlson, H C ^c   Lockwood, M ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY CENTRE IN SVALBARD   (Norway)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^d RUTHERFORD APPLETON LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYERS; IONS; MAGNETOSPHERE; PARTICLE SPECTROMETERS;

AURORAL TRANSIENTS; LOW LATITUDE BOUNDARY LAYERS; MAGNETOSHEATH PLASMA; MAGNETOSPHERIC IONS; PARTICLE SPECTROGRAMS;

ATMOSPHERIC OPTICS; TRANSIENTS;

AURORA; BOUNDARY LAYER; MAGNETOSPHERE; NOAA-12;

AURORAL ACTIVITIES; DIRECTION OF MOTION; LOW LATITUDE BOUNDARY LAYER; MAGNETOSHEATH PLASMA; MAGNETOSPHERIC IONS; OPEN FIELD LINES; SECONDARY COMPONENTS; SPECTROGRAMS;

EID: 0030292130     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/96GL02766     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cowley, S. W. H, and Z. V. Lewis, Magnetic trapping of energetic particles on open dayside boundary layer flux tubes, Planet. Space Sci., 38, 1343, 1990.
2. Cowley, S.W. H. et al., The ionospheric signature of flux transfer events, in «CLUSTER - dayside polar cusp», ESA SP-330, pp105-112, Nordwijk, The Netherlands, 1991.
3. Curran, D. B., and C. K. Goertz, Particle distributions in a two-dimesional reconnection field geometry, J. Geophys. Res, 94, 272, 1989.
4. Eastman, T. E., and L. A. Frank, Observations of high-speed plasma flow near the Earth's magnetopause: Evidence for reconnection?, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 2187, 1982.
5. Lockwood, M., and J. Moen, Ion populations on open field lines within the low-latitude boundary layer: Theory and observations during a dayside transient event, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2895, 1996.
6. Lockwood, M., and M. F. Smith, Comment on «mapping the dayside ionosphere to the magnetosphere according to particle precipitation characteristics», Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1739, 1993.
7. Lyons, L. R et al., Low-latitude boundary layer near noon: An open field line model, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 17,367, 1994.
8. Lysak, R. L. and C. W. Carlson, The effect of microscopic turbulence on magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 269, 1981.
9. Mc Diarmid, I. B., J. R. Burrows, and E. E. Budzinski, Particle properties in the dayside cleft, J. Geophys., Res., 81, 221, 1976.
10. Moen, J. et al., Events of enhanced convection and related dayside auroral activity, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 23917, 1995.
11. Newell, P. T., and C.-I. Meng, The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer: low-altitude identification and statistical local time variation, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 14, 549, 1988.
12. Onsager, T. G. et al., Model of magnetosheath plasma in the magnetosphere: Cusp and mantle particles at low-altitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 479, 1993.
13. Y, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 7737, 1993.