Interplay between thermal fluctuations and uniformly distributed Tc inhomogeneities: Application to inhomogeneous Bi2Sr2Ca1Cu2O8 crystals

Journal of Low Temperature Physics

Volumn 105, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 675-680

  Pomar, A ^a,d   Ramallo, M V ^a   Mosqueira, J ^a   Siebold, Th ^a   Campa J A ^b   Rasines, I ^c   Maza, J ^a   Vidal, Félix ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA DE MATERIALES DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER OXIDES; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SOLIDS; MAGNETOELECTRIC EFFECTS; THERMAL EFFECTS; THERMOANALYSIS;

FLUCTUATION INDUCED MAGNETOCONDUCTIVITY; IN PLANE PARACONDUCTIVITY; OXYGEN CONTENT INHOMOGENEITIES;

OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS;

EID: 0030290314     PISSN: 00222291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00768462     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Maza and F. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 43, 10560 (1991).
2. c. For an analysis of these anomalies, associated in the case of ρ(T) with temperature dependent current density redistributions at the length scales of the inhomogeneities, see J. Mosqueira et al., Physica C 225, 34 (1994);
3. Physica C ibid. 229, 301 (1994);
4. Physica C ibid. 253, 1 (1995).
5. C. M. Fu et al., Physica C 200, 17 (1992).
6. V. Calzona et al., Solid State Commun. 87, 397 (1993).
7. A. K. Pradhan et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 7180 (1994).
8. S. Hikami and A. I. Larkin, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2, 693 (1988).
9. K. Maki and R. S. Thompson, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2769 (1989).
10. A. G. Aronov, S. Hikami and A. I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 965 (1989);
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. ibid. 62, 2336E (1989).
12. J. B. Bieri and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. B 42, 4854 (1990).
13. R. S. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2280 (1991).
14. S. Ullah and A. T. Dorsey, Phys. Rev. B 44, 262 (1991).
15. M. V. Ramallo et al., Physica C 230, 97 (1994);
16. Physica C ibid. 235-240, 2105 (1994);
17. Phys. Rev. B (in press).
18. Note that in the MV paper (Ref. 1) this equation contains a typographical error (a minus sign instead of the plus sign in the denominator). Let us note also here that Lang and co-workers (W. Lang et al., Pysica C 226, 267 (1994);
19. e instead of the average one, which introduces appreciable inconsistencies in their analyses.
20. A. Pomar et al., Phys. Rev. B (in press).
21. J. A. Veira and F. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 42, 8748 (1990).