Analysis of pedestrian conflicts with left-turning traffic

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1538, 1996, Pages 61-67

  Lord, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DATA RECORDING; GROUND VEHICLES; INTERSECTIONS; PEDESTRIAN SAFETY; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

LEFT TURNING TRAFFIC; T INTERSECTIONS; TRAFFIC CONFLICT TECHNIQUE; X INTERSECTIONS;

STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 0030286873     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1538-08     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Quaye, K., L. Larsden, and E. Hauer. Pedestrian Accidents and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1993.
2. Habib, P. A. Pedestrian Safety: The Hazards of Left-Turning Vehicles. ITE Journal, 1980, pp. 33-37.
3. Fruin, J. J. Pedestrian Accident Characteristics in a One-Way Grid. In Highway Research Record 436, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1973, pp. 1-7.
4. Almuina, A. L. Pedestrian Accidents and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. M.Eng. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1989.
5. Zaidel, D. M., and I. Hocherman. Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1141, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 1-6.
6. Zegeer, C. V., K. S. Opiela, and M. J. Cynecki. Effect of Pedestrian Signals and Signal Timing on Pedestrian Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 847, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 62-72.
7. Hauer, E., J. C. N. Ng, and J. Lovell. Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersection. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48-61.
8. Zegeer, C. V., J. G. Mayes, and R. C. Deen. Cost Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Widening of Rural Two-Lane Roads in Kentucky. In Transportation Research Record 806, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 33-43.
9. Hauer, E., and B. N. Persaud. How to Estimate the Safety of Rail-Highway Grade Crossings and the Safety Effects of Warning Devices. In Transportation Research Record 1114, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 131-140.
10. Mengert, P. Rail-Highway Crossing Resource Allocation Procedure: User's Guide, 2nd edition. Report FHWA-IP-86-11, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1986.
11. Perkins, S. R., and J. L. Harris. Traffic Conflict Characteristics - Accident Potential at Intersections. In Highway Research Record 225, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1968, pp. 35-44.
12. Glauz, W. D., and D. J. Migletz. The Traffic Conflict Technique of the United States of America. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 1984, pp. 41-58.
13. Erke, H. The Traffic Conflict Technique of the Federal Republic of Germany. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 1984, pp. 107-120.
14. Mulhrad, N., and C. Dupré. The French Traffic Conflict Technique. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1984, pp. 121-132.
15. Cooper, P. J. Experience with Traffic Conflicts in Canada with Emphasis on Post Encroachment Time Techniques. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 1984, pp. 75-96.
16. Hydén, C. The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Bulletin 70, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, 1987.
17. Williams, M. J. Validity of the Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1981, pp. 133-145.
18. Brown, G. R., et al. Evaluation of Urban Intersection Improvements Using Traffic Conflicts, Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1986.
19. Garder, P. Pedestrian Safety at Traffic Signals: A Study Carried Out with the Help of a Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1989, pp. 435-444.
20. Davies, S. E., D. H. Robertson, and E. K. King. Pedestrian/Vehicle Conflicts: An Accident Prediction Model. In Transportation Research Record 1210, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 1-11.
21. Zimolong, B., H. Gstalter, and H. Erke. Traffic Conflicts at Urban Junctions - Reliability and Validity Studies. Institute of Psychology, University of Technology Brunswick, Germany, 1980.
22. Jones, G. Driver Behaviour at Signalized Intersections. M.A.Sc. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1992.
23. Lord, D. Pedestrian Conflicts and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. M.A.Sc. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1994.
24. Brown, G. R. Traffic Conflicts for Road User Safety Studies. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1994, pp. 1-15.
25. Hauer, E., and P. Gårder. Research into the Validity of the Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1986, pp. 471-481.