Understanding why stakeholders matter

Journal of Management in Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 59-64

  Eschenbach, Richard C ^a   Eschenbach, Ted G ^b  

^a Div of LESAT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RISKS; WASTE TREATMENT;

RISK BENEFIT VALUE; STAKEHOLDERS;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0030282237     PISSN: 0742597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:6(59)     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Austin, B. A., and Wisness, S. H. (1994). "Defining the framework for environmentally compliant cleanup: the Hanford site tri-party agreement." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 447-450.
2. Brown, B. W., Quapp, W. J., and Eddy, T. L. (1994). "System benefits and economics associated with high-temperature melters for vitrification of heterogeneous mixed wastes." Rep. Presented at Emerging Technologies in Hazardous Waste Mgmt. VI (proceedings forthcoming). American Chemical Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
3. Chaturvedi, L., and Neill, R. H. (1994). "Current status of the waste isolation pilot plant." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 521-525.
4. DeArmon, E. (1993). "Risk communication: the art and method of reasonableness." Proc., of the 1993 Incineration Conf., U.C. Irvine, Irvine, Calif., 551-554.
5. Goodenough, J. D., Janaskie, M. T., and Kleinen, P. J. (1994). "The optimized baseline project: reinventing environmental restoration at Hanford." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 465-469.
6. Hale, P. S. (1994). "Public participation at Hanford: a new approach to a long-lived problem." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 471-474.
7. Jackson, J., Gillette, J., Goldberg, M., and Hooper, C. (1994). "Stakeholder involvement in DOE's cost improvement initiative for environmental restoration and waste management activities." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 1353-1357.
8. Kurstedt, H. A. (1994). "Lessons learned from facilitating the state and tribal government working group." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 1151-1154.
9. O'Rear, M. G., and Sauls, V. W. (1993). "Public acceptance plan for the consolidated incineration facility-Savannah River site." Proc., of the 1993 Incineration Conf., U.C. Irvine, Irvine, Calif., 445-447.
10. Robison, A. C., Seidler, P., Ulick, M., and Smith, L. (1994). "The ins, the outs, the ups, and downs of constituent involvement: the Yucca Mountain project, a case study." Proc., of the Symp. on Waste Mgmt., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 517-519.
11. Severson, G. (1994). "Gaining community acceptance." Proc., of the 1994 Incineration Conf., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 127-130.
12. Slovic, P. (1987). "Perception of risk." Sci., 236, 280-285.
13. Smedes, G. (1994). "Siting strategies for three hazardous waste incinerator proposals in Washington state." Proc., of the 1994 Incineration Conf., Laser Options, Inc., Tucson, Ariz., 121-125.
14. Starr, C. (1969). "Social benefit versus technological risk." Sci., 165(3899), 1232-1238.
15. Unsworth, D. J. (1994). "Redefining public involvement." J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 10(4), 13-15.