Monitoring potential photochemical interference in laser-induced fluorescence measurements of atmospheric OH

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 23, Issue 22, 1996, Pages 3215-3218

  Dubey, Manvendra K ^a,b   Hanisco, Thomas F ^a   Wennberg, Paul O ^a   Anderson, James G ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; FLUORESCENCE; FREE RADICALS; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; TROPOSPHERE; LASER EXCITATION; LASER OPTICS; LASER PRODUCED PLASMAS; PULSE REPETITION RATE; RATE CONSTANTS;

ATMOSPHERIC HYDROXIDES; LASER INDUCED FLUORESCENCE; PERFLUOROPROPENE; PHOTOCHEMICAL INTERFERENCES;

ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION; TROPOSPHERE;

HYDROXYL RADICAL; LASER INDUCED FLUORESCENCE; PERFLUOROPROPENE;

AMBIENT AIR; CHEMICAL REMOVALS; DISCHARGE-FLOW TECHNIQUE; GROUND BASED; IN-SITU MEASUREMENT; LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE MEASUREMENTS; MEASUREMENTS OF; PHOTOCHEMICAL INTERFERENCES; REMOVAL RATE; TEMPERATURE RANGE;

EID: 0030282226     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/96GL03008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 2 → products, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 2382-2390, 1991.
2. Albritton, D. L., F. C. Fehsenfeld, and A. F. Tuck, Instrumental requirements for global atmospheric chemistry, Science, 250, 75-81, 1990.
3. 2 in the atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3299-3314, 1995.
4. Crutzen, P. J., A discussion of the chemistry of some minor constituents in the stratosphere and troposphere, Pure Appl. Geophys., 106, 1385-1399, 1973.
5. Donahue, N. M., K. L. Demerjian, and J. G. Anderson, Reaction modulation spectroscopy: A new approach to quantifying reaction mechanisms, J. Phys. Chem., in press, 1996.
6. Hard, T. M., A. A. Mehrabzadeh, C. Y. Chan, and R. J. O'Brien, FAGE measurements of tropospheric HO with measurements and model of interferences, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 9795-9817, 1992.
7. Howard, C. J., Kinetic measurements using flow tubes, J. Phys. Chem., 83, 3-9, 1979.
8. Jucks, K. W., et al., Ozone production and loss rate measurements in the middle stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 1996.
9. Kirchner, K., D. Helf, P. Ott, and S. Vogt, The reaction of OH radicals with 1,1-di-, tri- and tetrachloroethylene, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 94, 77-83, 1990.
10. Mcllroy, A. and F. P. Tully, Kinetic study of OH reactions with perfluoropropene and perfluorobenzene, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 610-614, 1993.
11. Shirinzadeh, B., C. C. Wang, and D. Q. Deng, Pressure dependence of ozone interference in the laser fluorescence measurements of OH in the atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 26, 2102-2105, 1987.
12. Smith, G. P. and D. R. Crosley, A photochemical model of ozone interference effects in laser detection of tropospheric OH, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16427-16442, 1990.
13. 2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3543-3557, 1994.
14. Stimpfle, R. M. and J. G. Anderson, In situ detection of OH in the lower stratosphere with a balloon borne high repetition rate laser system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 1503-1506, 1988.
15. 2, ClO, and BrO, Science, 266, 398-404, 1994a.
16. Wennberg, P. O., et al., Aircraft-borne, laser-induced fluorescence instrument for the in situ detection of hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 65, 1858-1876, 1994b.