Social workers' attitudes toward participants' rights in adoption and new reproductive technologies

Health and Social Work

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 257-266

  Holbrook, Sarah M ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Attitudes; Donor insemination; In vitro fertilization; Surrogate motherhood

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; ADULT; ADULT CHILD; AGED; ARTICLE; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL WORK; SPERMATOZOON;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ADOPTION; ADULT; ADULT CHILDREN; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DISCLOSURE; FAMILY; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES; SOCIAL WORK; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 0030281337     PISSN: 03607283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hsw/21.4.257     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adoptive parents rebuffed by high court in last plea. (1995, June 20). New York Times, p. B7.
2. Andrews, L. (1989). Between strangers. New York: Harper & Row.
3. Baran, A., & Pannor, R. (1989). Lethal secrets. New York: Warner Books.
4. Becker, M. E. (1989). The rights of unwed parents: Feminist approaches. Social Service Review, 63, 496-517.
5. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Feigelman, W., & Silverman, A. R. (1986). Adoptive parents, adoptees, and the sealed record controversy. Social Casework, 67, 219-226.
7. Field, M. A. (1988). Surrogate motherhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Frank, D., & Vogel, M. (1988). The baby makers. New York: Carroll & Graf.
9. Glazer, E. S., & Cooper, S. L. (1988). Without child: Experiencing and resolving infertility. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
10. Holbrook, S. M. (1990). Adoption, infertility, and the new reproductive technologies: Problems and prospects for social work and welfare policy. Social Work, 35, 333-337.
11. Jones, M. A. (1976). The sealed adoption record controversy: Report of a survey of agency policy, practice and opinion. New York: Child Welfare League of America.
12. Kornegay, R. J. (1990). Is commercial surrogacy baby-selling? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 7, 45-50.
13. Lifton, B. J. (1988). Lost and found: The adoption experience. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Macklin, R. (1991). Artificial means of reproduction and our understanding of the family. Hastings Center Report, 21(1), 5-11.
15. National Association of Social Workers. (1991). NASW register of clinical social workers. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
16. Pact is reached in Vermont adoption case. (1993, August 20). New York Times, p. A12.
17. Parental rights denied to a surrogate mother. (1993, May 22). New York Times, p. A6.
18. Patterson, N. (1993, July 27). Accidental justice for Jessica DeBoer. New York Times, p. A13.
19. Rompf, E. L. (1993). Open adoption: What does the "average person" think? Child Welfare, 72, 219-230.
20. Rothman, B. K. (1989). Recreating motherhood. New York: W. W. Norton.
21. Sachdev, P. (1989). Unlocking the adoption files. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
22. Sandelowski, M., Harris, B. G., & Holditch-Davis, D. (1989). Mazing: Infertile couples and the quest for a child. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 21, 220-226.
23. Shalev, C. (1989). Birth power: The case for surrogacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Wymelenberg, S. (1990). Science and babies: Private decisions, public dilemmas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25. Yoxen, E. (1990). Conflicting concerns: The political context of recent embryo research policy in Britain. In M. McNeil, I. Varcoe, & S. Yearley (Eds.), The new reproductive technologies (pp. 173-199). New York: St. Martin's Press.
26. Zeilinger, R. (1979). The need vs. the right to know. Public Welfare, 37(3), 44-47.
27. Zipper, J., & Sevenhuijsen, S. (1987). Surrogacy: Feminist notions of motherhood reconsidered. In M. Stanworth (Ed.), Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood, and medicine (pp. 118-138). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.