A clinical comparison of a light cured glass ionomer sealant restoration with a composite sealant restoration

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 399-405

  Kilpatrick, N M ^a,b   Murray, J J ^a   McCabe, J F ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b West mead Hospital   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Occlusal caries; Sealant restorations

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FISSURE SEALANT; GLASS IONOMER; P50 COMPOSITE RESIN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VITRABOND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SCOTCHBOND; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030278616     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00100-X     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. O'Brien M. Children's Dental Health in the United Kingdom 1993. London: HMSO. 1994
2. Dummer PMH, Oliver SJ, Hicks R et al. Factors influencing the initiation of carious lesions in specific tooth surfaces over a 4-year period in children between the ages of 11-12 years and 15-16 years. J Dent 1990; 18: 190-197.
3. Hyatt TP. Prophylactic odontotomy. The cutting into the tooth for the prevention of disease. Dent Cosmos 1923; 65: 234-241.
4. Cueto EI, Buonocore MG. Sealing of pits and fissures with an adhesive resin: its use in caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 75: 121-128.
5. Simonsen RJ, Stallard RE. Sealant restorations utilising a diluted filled composite resin: one year results. Quintessence Int 1977; 8: 77-84.
6. Simonsen RJ. Preventive resin restorations (I). Quintessence Int 1978; 9: 69-76.
7. Garcia-Godoy F. The preventive glass ionomer restoration. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 617-619.
8. Garcia-Godoy F. Preventive glass ionomer restorations. Am J Dent 1988; 1: 97-99.
9. Henry RJ, Jerrell RG. The glass ionomer rest-a-seal. J Dent Child 1989; 56: 283-287.
10. Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of preventive glass ionomer restorations. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1988; 9: 88-94.
11. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P et al. Design and analysis of randomised clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977; 35: 271-274.
12. Mitchell L, Walls AWG. Life survival analysis in practise. Dent Update 1991; 18: 125-128.
13. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford UK, 1987, 2nd Edition.
14. Walls AWG, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A clinical trial comparing a minimal composite restoration with an occlusal amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 288-292.
15. Houpt M, Fuks A, Eidelman E et al. Composite/sealant restorations: 6 1/2 year results. Paediatr Dent 1988; 10: 304-306.
16. Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ et al. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 361-366.
17. Walker JD, Jensen ME, Pinkham JR. A clinical review of preventive resin restorations. J Dent Child 1990; 57: 257-259.
18. Jensen OE, Handelman SL, Perez-Diez F. Occlusal wear of four pit and fissure sealants over two years. Paediatr Dent 1985; 7: 23-29.
19. Conry JP, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Quantitative changes in fissure sealant six months after placement. Paediatr Dent 1990; 12: 162-167.
20. Davies JA. Dental restoration longevity: a critique of the life table method of analysis. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987; 15: 202-204.
21. Gray GB, Paterson RC. Clinical assessment of glass ionomer/composite resin sealant restorations in permanent teeth: results of a field trial after 1 year. Int J Paediatr Dent 1994; 4: 141-146.
22. Kilpatrick NM. Glass ionomer cements: factors influencing their durability. PhD Thesis. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1993.
23. Nicholson JW, Anstice HM, McLean JW. A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light cured glass ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1992; 173:98-101.
24. Hunter B. Survival of dental restorations in young patients. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13: 285-287.
25. Walls AWG, Wallwork MA, Holland IS et al. The longevity of occlusal amalgam restorations in first permanent molars of child patients. Br Dent J 1985; 158: 133-136.
26. Smales RJ. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 330-333.
27. Eidelman E, Fuks AB, Chosak A. The retention of fissure sealants: rubber dam or cotton rolls in a private practice. J Dent Child 1983; 50: 259-261.