Bidirectional instrumental conditioning

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 289-306

  Dickinson, A ^a,c   Campos, J ^b   Varga, Z I ^a   Balleine, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; APPETITE; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MOTIVATION; ORIENTATION; RATS; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SATIETY RESPONSE;

EID: 0030277424     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams, C.D., & Dickinson, A. (1981). Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33B, 109-122.
2. Campbell, L.S., & Dougan, J.D. (1995). Within-session changes in the VI response function: Separating food density from elapsed session time. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 95-110.
3. Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365-382.
4. Colwill, R.C., & Rescorla, R.A. (1985). Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132.
5. Colwill, R.C., & Rescorla, R.A. (1986). Associative structures in instrumental learning. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 20 (pp. 55-104). New York: Academic Press.
6. Davis, E.R., & Platt, J.R. (1983). Contiguity and contingency in the acquisition and maintenance of an operant. Learning and Motivation, 14, 487-512.
7. Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Delamater, A.R. (1995). Outcome-selective effects of intertrial reinforcement in a Pavlovian appetitive conditioning paradigm with rats. Animal Learning and Behaviour, 23, 31-39.
9. de Villiers, P.A., & Herrnstein, R.J. (1976). Towards a law of response strength. Psychological Review, 83, 1131-1153.
10. Dickinson, A. (1987). Instrumental performance following saccharin pre-feeding. Behavioural Processes, 14, 147-154.
11. Dickinson, A. (1989). Expectancy theory in animal conditioning. In S.B Klein & R.R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theories (pp. 279-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Dickinson, A., & Mulatero, C.W. (1989). Reinforcer specificity of the suppression of instrumental performance on a non-contingent schedule. Behavioural Processes, 19, 167-180.
13. Dickinson, A., Nicholas, D.J., & Adams, C.D. (1983). The effect of the instrumental training contingency on susceptibility to reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35B, 35-51.
14. Dickinson, A., & Shanks, D.R. (1995). Instrumental action and causal representation. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A.J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 5-25). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Dougan, J.D., Kuh, J.A., & Vink, K.L. (1993). Session duration and the VI response function: Within-session prospective and retrospective effects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 543-557.
16. Grindley, G.C. (1932). The formation of a simple habit in guinea pigs. British Journal of Psychology, 23, 127-147.
17. Hammond, L.J. (1980). The effects of contingencies upon appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 297-304.
18. Heyes, C., & Dickinson, A. (1990). The intentionality of animal action. Mind & Language, 5, 87-104.
19. Heyes, C., Dawson, G.R., & Nokes, T. (1992). Imitation in rats: Initial responding and transfer evidence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 229-240.
20. Holland, P.C., & Rescorla, R.A. (1975). The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 355-363.
21. Holland, P.C., & Straub, J.J. (1979). Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 65-78.
22. Killeen, P.R. (1982). Incentive theory. In D.J. Bernstein (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 29. Response structure and organization (pp. 169-216). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
23. Killeen, P.R. (1994). Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 105-172.
24. Lovibond, P.F. (1983). Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 225-247.
25. Mackintosh, N.J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
26. McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-188.
27. Miller, R.R., & Matzel, L.D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 22 (pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Miller, S., & Konorski, J. (1969). On a particular form of conditioned reflex. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 187-189.
29. [Translation by B.F. Skinner of: Sur une forme particulière des reflex conditionnels. Les Comptes Rendus Des Seances de la Société Polonaise de Biologie, 1928, 49, 1155-1157.]
30. Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Pearce, J.M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
32. Rescorla, R.A., & Solomon, R.L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151-182.
33. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. Scott, G.K., & Platt, J.R. (1985). Model of response-reinforcer contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 152-171.
35. Shanks, D.R., Lopez, F.J., Darby, R.J., & Dickinson, A. (in press). Distinguishing associative and probabilistic contrast theories of human contingency judgment. The psychology of learning and motivation.
36. Skinner, B.F. (1932). On the rate of formation of a conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 274-285.
37. Sutton, R.S., & Barto, A.G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88, 135-171.
38. Thorndike, E.L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.
39. Tolman, E.C. (1959). Principles of purposive behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, vol. 2 (pp. 92-157). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Trapold, M.A., & Overmier, J.B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 427-452). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
41. Wasserman, E.A. (1990). Detecting response-outcome relations: Towards an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 26 (pp. 27-82). New York: Academic Press.
42. Williams, B.A. (1989). The effect of response contingency and reinforcement identity on response suppression by alternative reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 20, 204-224.