Real-time implementation of electromyogram pattern recognition as a control command of man-machine interface

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 529-537

  Chang, Gwo Ching ^b   Kang, Wen Juh ^b   Jer Junn, Luh ^b   Cheng, Cheng Kung ^b   Lai, Jin Shin ^a   Chen, Jia Jin J ^b   Kuo, Te Son ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cepstral coefficient; Electromyogram signal; Man machine interface; Pattern recognition; Real time

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA ACQUISITION; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; ELECTRODES; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MUSCLE; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; USER INTERFACES;

CEPSTRAL COEFFICIENT; CONTROL COMMANDS; SURFACE ELECTRODES;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ELECTROMYOGRAM; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030272576     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(96)00006-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1. Graupe D. EMG pattern analysis for patient-responsive control of FES in paraplegics for walker-supported walking. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989; BME-36: 711-9.
2. 2. Hefftner G, Jaros G. The electromyogram (EMG) as a control signal for functional neuromuscular stimulation - Part I: Autoregressive modeling as a mean of EMG signature discrimination. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; BME-35: 228-37.
3. 3. Doerschuk PC, Gustafson KE, Willsky AS. Upper extremity limb function discrimination using EMG signal analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1983; BME-30: 18-28.
4. 4. Graupe D, Salahi J, Zhang DS. Stochastic analysis of myoelectric temporal signatures for multifunctional single-site activation of prosthesis and orthoses. J Biomed Eng 1985; 7: 18-29.
5. 5. Hudgins B, Parker P, Scott RN. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993; BME-40: 82-94.
6. 6. Saridis GN, Gootee TP. EMG pattern analysis and classification for a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1982; BME-29: 403-12.
7. 7. Triolo RJ, Nash DH, Moskowitz GD. The identification of time-series models of lower extremity EMG for the control of prosthesis using Box-Jenkins criteria. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; BME-35: 584-94.
8. 8. Putnam W, Knapp RB. Real-time computer control using pattern recognition of the electromyogram. Proc IEEE EMBS, San Diego, CA, 1993; 1236-7.
9. 9. Hogan N. A review of the methods of processing EMG for use as a proportional control signal. Biomed Eng 1976; 10: 81-6.
10. 10. Graupe D, Clink WK. Functional separation of EMG signals via ARMA identification methods for prosthesis control purposes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1975; SMC-5: 252-9.
11. 11. Graupe D, Salahi J, Kohn KH. Multifunctional prosthesis and orthosis control via microcomputer identification of temporal pattern differences in single-site myoelectric signals. J Biomed Eng 1982; 4: 17-22.
12. 12. Graupe D, Magnussen J, Beex AA. A microprocessor system for multifunctional control of upper-limb prosthesis via myoelectric signal identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 1978; AC-23: 538-44.
13. 13. Latwesen A, Patterson PE. Identification of lower arm motions using the EMG signals of shoulder muscles. Med Eng Phys 1994; 16: 113-21.
14. 14. Atal BS. Effectiveness of linear prediction characteristics of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification. J Acoust Soc Amer 1974; 55: 1304-12.
15. 15. Furui S. Cepstral analysis technique for automatic speaker verification. IEEE Tran Acoust Speech Signal Process 1981; ASSP-29: 254-72.
16. 16. Kang WJ, Shiu JR, Cheng CK, Lai JS, Tsao HW and Kuo TS. The application of cepstral coefficients and maximum likelihood method in EMG pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995; BME-42: 777-85.
17. 17. Triolo RJ, Moskowitz GD. Comments on 'Upper extremity limb function discrimination using EMG signal analysis' and the relationship between parallel-filtering and hypothesis-testing limb function classifiers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; BME-32: 239-41.
18. 18. Kelly MF, Parker PA, Scott RN. The application of neural networks to myoelectric signals analysis: a preliminary study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990; BME-37: 221-9.
19. 19. Kang WJ, Cheng CK, Lai JS, Shiu JR and Kuo TS. Selection of the feature and classifier in EMG pattern recognition with different electrode arrangements. Med Eng Phys, 1996; 18(5): 390-395.
20. 20. Marhoul J. Linear prediction: a tutorial review. Proc IEEE 1975; 63: 561-80.
21. 21. Kay SM. Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
22. 22. Haykin S. Adaptive Filler Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
23. 23. Bow ST. Pattern Recognition and Image Preprocessing. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992.
24. 24. Hefftner G, Jaros G. The electromyogram (EMG) as a control signal for functional neuromuscular stimulation - Part II: Practical demonstration of the EMG signature discrimination system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; BME-35: 238-42.
25. 25. Kang WJ, Cheng CK, Lai JS, Tsao HW and Kuo TS. The effect of electrode configuration on spectral distance measures Proc IEEE EMBS, Baltimore, MD, 1994; 353-4.