Modeling of a team's decision-making process

Safety Science

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 13-33

  Sasou, Kunihide ^a   Takano, Ken'ichi ^a   Yoshimura, Seiichi ^a  

^a CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; PLANT MANAGEMENT;

SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR THE BEHAVIOR OF AN OPERATING GROUP (SYBORG);

DECISION MAKING;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; MODEL; OPERATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEAMWORK;

EID: 0030272311     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(96)00029-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Basar, T., et al., 1989. The theory of teams: a selective annotated bibliography. Lecture Notes Control Information Science, Vol. 119, pp. 186-201.
2. Bennett, C.T., et al., 1994. The cost of human error intervention. Proceedings of the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Meeting II, March 20-24, 1994, San Diego, CA.
3. Cacciabue, P.C., 1992. COSIMO: a cognitive simulation model of human decision-making and behavior in accident management of complex plants. IEEE-SMC, 22-5: 1058-1074.
4. Danaher, J.W., 1980. Human errors in ATC system operation. Human Factors, 22: 535-545.
5. DeKleer, J., et al., 1983. Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistics mental models. In: Gentner, D. and Stevens, A.L. (Eds.), Mental Models, pp. 155-190. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Gero, D., 1994. Aviation Disasters, Patrick Stephens Ltd.
7. Hovland, C.I., et al., 1951. The influence of resource credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15: 635-650.
8. Janis, I.L., 1972. Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes, Boston: Houghton Miffin.
9. NUREG/CR-5455, Vol. 3, 1993. Development of the NRC'S human performance investigation process (HPIP). Development Document, US NRC.
10. Perry, J.B., et al., 1978. Collective behavior: response to social stress. St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
11. Sasou, K., et al., 1993a. Development of a team behavior simulation model. Fourth European Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control, Frederiksborg, Denmark.
12. Sasou, K., et al., 1993b. A study on the operating team activity of a nuclear power plant under abnormal operating conditions. Safety Science, 81: 143-156.
13. Staggers, N., et al., 1993. Mental models: concepts for human-computer interaction research. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 38: 587-605.
14. Stoner, J.A.F., 1961. A comparison of individual and group decisions including risk. Unpublished Master's Thesis, School of Industrial Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Takano, K., 1993. Relationship and modeling between mental workload, arousal level and stress. Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 29: 369-374.
16. Takano, K., et al., 1994a. Behavior simulation of operator team in nuclear power plant - development of an individual operator model. CRIEPI Report S93001 (Japanese).
17. Takano, K., et al., 1994b. Construction of operators' models coping with abnormal events in nuclear power plants. International Journal of Man Machine Studies (submitted).
18. Takano, K., et al., 1994c. Knowledge base structure to create the operator's mental model in coping with an abnormal event at nuclear power plants. International Journal of Human Computer Studies (submitted).
19. Woods, D.D., et al., 1987. Cognitive environment simulation: an artificial intelligence system for human performance assessment: modeling human intention formation. NUREG/CR48 62, Vol. 2.
20. Yagi, T., 1987. YG personality test. Institute of Psychological Technology (Japanese).
21. Yoshimura, S., et al., 1994. Team Behavior simulation model - Proposal of the conception. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 53: 574-578.