Intergroup collective induction

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 44-57

  Laughlin, Patrick R ^a   Shupe, Ellen I ^a  

^a Department of Psychology ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030268986     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0088     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(No. 416), 1-70.
2. Baron, R. S., Kerr, N. L., & Miller, N. (1992). Group process, group decision, group action. Bristol, PA: Open Univ. Press.
3. Crott, H. W., & Werner, J. (1994). The norm-information-distance model: A stochastic approach to preference change in group interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 68-95.
4. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
5. Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 157-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Davis, J. H. (1992). Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950-1990. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 3-38.
7. Garrett, L. (1995). Ebola's unanswered questions. Scientific American, 273(4), 62-64.
8. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
9. Hastie, R. (1986). Review essay: Experimental evidence on group accuracy. In G. Owen & B. Grofman (Eds.), Information pooling and group accuracy (pp. 129-157). Westport, CT: JAI.
10. Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
11. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
12. Kameda, T. (1991). Procedural influence in small-group decision making: Deliberation style and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 245-256.
13. Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313.
14. Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
15. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R., Hansen, C. H., & Hymes, J. A. (1987). Gaining and losing social support: Momentum in decision-making groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 119-145.
16. Laughlin, P. R. (1988). Collective induction: Group performance, social combination processes, and mutual majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 254-267.
17. Laughlin, P. R. (1992). Performance and influence in simultaneous collective and individual induction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 447-470.
18. Laughlin, P. R. (1996). Group decision making and collective induction. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 61-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Laughlin, P. R., Chandler, J. S., Shupe, E. I., Magley, V. J., & Hulbert, L. G. (1995). Generality of a theory of collective induction: Face-to-face and computer-mediated interaction, amount of potential information, and group versus member choice of evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 98-111.
20. Laughlin, P. R., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1995). A theory of collective induction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 94-107.
21. Laughlin, P. R., & McGlynn, R. P. (1986). Collective induction: Mutual group and individual influence by exchange of hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 567-589.
22. McGlynn, R. P., Tubbs, D. D., & Holzhausen, K. G. (1995). Hypothesis generation in groups constrained by evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 64-81.
23. Miller, C. E. (1989). The social psychological effects of group decision rules. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. 2nd. Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-379.
25. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latane, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
26. Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146, 347-353.
27. Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 279-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Memory performance by decision making groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 289-300.
30. Zuber, J. A., Crott, H. W., & Werner, J. (1992). Choice shift and group polarization: An analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 50-61.