The big five as tendencies in situations: A replication study

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 527-535

  Hendriks, A A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030268936     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00093-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
2. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
3. De Raad, B. (1993). Have trait psychologists been ignorant of context? Commentary on the chapter by N. S. Endler. In Hettema, J. & Deary, I. J. (Eds) Foundations of personality (pp. 269-273). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
5. Endler, N. S. (1993). Personality: An interactional perspective. In Hettema, J. & Deary, I. J. (Eds) Foundations of personality (pp. 251-268). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Endler, N. S. & Parker, J. D. A. (1992). Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area. European Journal of Personality, 6, 177-198.
7. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? - Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
8. Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The Big Five or Giant Three: Criteria for a paradigm. In Halverson, C. F. Jr, Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P. (Eds) The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 37-51). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
9. Goldberg, L. R. (1989, June). Standard markers of the Big-Five factor structure. Paper presented at the workshop on personality language, University of Groningen.
10. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative 'description of personality': The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
11. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
12. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
13. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B. & De Raad, B. (1993, August). Construction of the AB5C personality questionnaire. Paper presented at the 2nd Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment, Groningen.
14. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B. & De Raad, B. (1994, July). Short behavior-descriptive sentences as units of personality measurement. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Personality Psychology, Madrid.
15. Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8, 149-162.
16. Hofstee, W. K. B. & De Raad, B. (1991). Persoonlijkheidsstructuur: De AB5C-taxonomic van Nederlandse eigenschapstermen [Personality structure: The AB5C taxonomy of Dutch trait terms]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 46, 262-274.
17. Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B. & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
18. John, O. P. (1990). The 'Big Five' factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In Pervin, L. A. (Ed) Handbook of personality (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
19. Kenrick, D. T. & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
20. McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
21. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
22. Sarason, I. G., Smith, R. E. & Diener, E. (1975). Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 199-204.
23. Shavelson, R. J. & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park: Sage.
24. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N. & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
25. van Heck, G. L. (1984). The construction of a general taxonomy of situations. In Bonarius, H., van Heck, G. L. & Smid, N. (Eds) Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 149-164).
26. van Heck, G. L. (1989). Situation concepts: definitions and classification. In Hettema P. J. (Ed.) Personality and environment: Assessment of human adaptation (pp. 53-69, pp. 241-259). Chichester: Wiley.
27. van Heck, G. L., Perugini, M., Caprara, G.-V. & Fröger, J. (1994). The Big Five as tendencies in situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 715-731.
28. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
29. Zuckerman, M. (1994). An alternative five-factor model for personality. In Halverson, C. F. Jr, Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P. (Eds) The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy ot adulthood (pp. 53-68). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.