Influence of low-weight seeds and motes on the fiber properties of other cotton seeds

Field Crops Research

Volumn 48, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 141-153

  Davidonis, G H ^a   Johnson, A ^b   Landivar, J ^c   Hinojosa, O ^a  

^a SOUTHERN REGIONAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cotton fiber quality; Gossypium; Motes

Indexed keywords

COTTON FIBRES; COTTON MOTES; FIBRE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0030267699     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01018-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bradow, J.M., Hinojosa, O., Wartelle, L.H., Davidonis, G., Sassenrath-Cole, G.F. and Bauer, P.J., 1996. Applications of AFIS fineness and maturity module and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy in fiber maturity evaluation. Text. Res. J., (in press).
2. Chu, Y.T. and Shofner, F.M., 1992. Progress report on fineness and maturity distributions by AFIS. In: D.J. Herber and D.A. Richter (Editors), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN, 6-8 Jan. 1992. Natl. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, pp. 1017-1019.
3. Davidonis, G. and Hinojosa, O., 1994. Influence of seed location on cotton fiber development in plants and in vitro. Plant Sci., 103: 107-113.
4. Davidonis, G., Webb, J., May, S. and Hinojosa, O., 1995. Monitoring fiber quality during the ginning process using AFIS. In: D.J. Herber and D.A. Richter (Editors), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX, 4-7 Jan., 1995. Natl. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, pp. 1237-1239.
5. Grimes, D.W. and Yamada, H., 1982. Relation of cotton growth and yield to minimum leaf water potential. Crop Sci., 22: 134-139.
6. Iyengar, R.L.N., 1941. Variation in the measurable characters of cotton fibers II Variation among seeds with a lock. Ind. J. Agri. Sci., 11: 703-735.
7. Kerby, T.A. and Ruppenicker, G.F., 1989. Node and fruiting branch position effects on fiber and seed quality characteristics. In: J.M. Brown (Editor), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Nashville, TN, 2-7 Jan. 1989. Natl. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, pp. 98-100.
8. Kerby, T.A., Keeley, M. and Watson, M., 1993. Variation in fiber development as affected by source to sink relationships. In: D.J. Herber and D.A. Richter (Editors), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., New Orleans, LA, 10-14 Jan. 1993. Natl. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, pp. 1248-1251.
9. Kittock, D.L., Pinkas, L.L.H. and Fry, K.E., 1979. Branch node location and competition effects on yield components of Pima cotton bolls, In: J.M. Brown (Editor), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Phoenix, AZ, 7-11 Jan., 1979. Natl. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, pp. 53-56.
10. Longenecker, D.E. and Erie, L.J., 1968. Irrigation water management. In: F.C. Elliot, M. Hoover and W.K. Porter, Jr. (Editors), Advances in Production and Utilization of Quality Cotton: Principles and Practices. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp. 323-345.
11. Pearson, N.L., 1949. Mote types in cotton and their occurrence as related to variety, environment, position in lock, lock size and number of locks per boll. USDA Tech. Bull. 100. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
12. Porter, D.D., 1936. Positions of seeds and motes in locks and lengths of cotton fibers from bolls borne at different positions on plants at Greenville, Texas. USDA Tech. Bull. 509. US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
13. Rea, H.E., 1928. Location of 'motes' in the upland cotton lock. Agron. J., 20: 1064-1068.
14. Stewart, J.McD., 1986. Integrated events in flower and fruit. In: J.R. Mauney and J.McD. Stewart (Editors), Cotton Physiology. Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN, pp. 261-300.
15. Turner, J.H., Stewart, J.McD., Hoskinson, P.E. and Ramey, H.H., 1977. Seed setting efficiency in eight cultivars of upland cotton. Crop Sci., 17: 769-772.
16. Vincke, H., DeLanghe, E., Fransen, T. and Verschraege, L., 1985. Cotton fibers are uniform in length under natural conditions, In: Cotton fibres: Their development and properties. International Institute for Cotton, Manchester, pp. 2-5.
17. Wakeham, H., 1955. Cotton fiber length distribution: an important quality factor. Text. Res. J., 25: 422-429.
18. Walhood, V.T. and McMeans, J.L., 1964. Seed number as a factor in fruit retention in cotton. In: Proc. 18th Ann. Beltwide Cotton Defol. and Physiol. Conf., Memphis, TN, 7-8 Jan., 1964. Natl. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, pp. 30-33.