Cotton responses to simulated insect damage: Radiation-use efficiency, canopy architecture and leaf nitrogen content as affected by loss of reproductive organs

Field Crops Research

Volumn 48, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 199-208

  Sadras, Víctor O ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Canopy architecture; Gossypium hirsutum; Insect damage; Leaf nitrogen; Light extinction coefficient; Radiation use efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030267213     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)00046-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Braam, J., 1993. Developmental and molecular responses to touch in plants. Evolutionary and molecular responses to touch in plants. In: ed. A.C. Spradling, Evolutionary Conservation of Developmental Mechanisms, 50th Symp. of the Soc. for Dev. Biol., Marquette University, Willey-Liss, New York, pp. 185-198.
2. Brook, K.D., Hearn, A.B. and Kelly, C.F., 1992. Response of cotton to damage by insect pests in Australia: Compensation for early season fruit damage. J. Econ. Entomol., 85: 1378-1386.
3. Charles-Edwards, D.A. and Lawn, R.J., 1984. Light interception by grain legume row crops. Plant Cell Environ., 7: 247-251.
4. Charles-Edwards, D.A., Doley, D. and Rimmington, G.M., 1986. Modelling Plant Growth and Development. Academic Press Australia, 235 pp.
5. Connor, D.J., Sadras, V.O. and Hall, A.J., 1995. Canopy nitrogen distribution and the photosynthetic performance of sunflower crops during grain filling - a quantitative analysis. Oecologia, 101: 274-281.
6. Constable, G.A., 1986. Growth and light receipt by mainstem cotton leaves in relation to plant density in the field. Agric. For. Meteorol., 37: 279-292.
7. Constable, G.A. and Rawson, H.M., 1980a. Effect of leaf position, expansion and age on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of cotton. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 7: 89-100.
8. Constable, G.A. and Rawson, H.M., 1980b. Photosynthesis, respiration and transpiration of cotton fruit. Photosynthetica, 14: 557-563.
9. Crowther, F., 1941. Studies in growth analysis of the cotton plant under irrigation in the Sudan. Ann. Bot., 19: 509-533.
10. Dale, J.E., 1959. Some effects of the continuous removal of floral buds on the growth of the cotton plant. Ann. Bot., 23: 636-649.
11. 3 species. Oecologia, 78: 91-19.
12. Finney, D.J., 1989. Was this in your statistics text book? VI Regression and covariance. Exp. Agric., 25: 291-311.
13. Hearn, A.B. and Fitt, G.P., 1992. Cotton cropping systems. In: ed. C.J. Pearson, Field Crop Ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 85-142.
14. Hikosaka, K., Terashima, I. and Katoh, S., 1994. Effects of leaf age, nitrogen nutrition and photon flux density on the distribution of nitrogen among leaves of a vine (Ipomea tricolor Cav.) grown horizontally to avoid mutual shading of leaves. Oecologia, 97: 451-457.
15. Karban, R. and Myers, J.H., 1989. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System., 20: 331-348.
16. Lang, A.R.G., 1973. Leaf orientation of a cotton plant. Agric. Meteorol., 11: 37-51.
17. Marani, A. and Ephrath, J., 1985. Penetration of radiation into cotton canopies. Crop Sci., 25: 309-313.
18. Monteith, J.L., 1994. Validity of the correlation between intercepted radiation and biomass. Agric. Forest Meteorol., 68: 213-220.
19. Niklas, K.J., 1988. The role of phyllotactic pattern as a developmental constrain on the interception of light by leaf surfaces. Evolution, 42: 1-16.
20. Peng, S. and Krieg, D.R., 1991. Single leaf and canopy photosynthesis response to plant age in cotton. Agron. J., 83: 704-708.
21. Rochester, I.J., Constable, G.A. and MacLeod, D.A., 1993. Cycling of fertilizer and cotton crop residue nitrogen. Aust. J. Soil Res., 31: 597-609.
22. Room, P.M., Maillette, L. and Hanan, J.S., 1993. Module and metamer dynamics and virtual plants. Adv. Ecol. Res., 25: 105-157.
23. Rosenthal, J.P. and Kotanen, P.M., 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol., 9: 145-148.
24. Runyon, J., Waring, R.H., Goward S.N. and Welles, J.M., 1994. Environmental limits on net primary production and radiation-use efficiency across the Oregon transect. Ecol. Appl., 4: 226-237.
25. Sadras, V.O., 1995. Compensatory growth in cotton after loss of reproductive organs. Field Crops Res., 40: 1-18.
26. Sadras, V.O., 1996. Cotton compensatory growth after loss of reproductive organs as affected by availability of resources and duration of recovery period. Oecologia (in press).
27. Sinclair, T.R. and Horie, T., 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis and crop radiation-use efficiency: a review. Crop Sci., 29: 90-98.
28. Staswick, P.E., 1994. Storage proteins of vegetative plant tissues. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 45: 303-322.
29. Steer, B.T., Milroy, S.P. and Karmona, R.M., 1993. A model to simulate the development, growth and yield of irrigated sunflower. Field Crops Res., 32: 83-99.
30. Takenaka, A., 1994. Effects of leaf blade narrowness and petiole length on the light capture efficiency of a shoot. Ecol. Res., 9: 109-114.
31. Trápani, N., Hall, A.J., Sadras, V.O. and Vilella, F., 1992. Ontogenetic changes in radiation use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) crops. Field Crops Res., 29: 301-316.
32. Trumble, J.T., Kolodny-Hirsh, D.M. and Ting, I.P, 1993. Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 38: 93-119.
33. Wall, G.W., Amthor, J.S. and Kimball, B.A., 1994. COTCO2: a cotton growth simulation model for global change. Agric. Forestry Meteorol., 70: 289-342.
34. Welter, S.C., 1989. Arthropod impact on plant gas exchange. In: ed. E.A. Bernays, Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 135-150.
35. Werger, M.J.A. and Hirose, T., 1991. Leaf nitrogen distribution and whole canopy photosynthetic carbon gain in herbaceous stands. Vegetatio, 97: 11-20.
36. Wullschleger, S.D. and Oosterhuis, D.M., 1990a. Canopy development and photosynthesis of cotton as influenced by nitrogen nutrition. J. Plant Nutrition, 13: 1141-1154.
37. Wullschleger, S.D. and Oosterhuis, D.M., 1990b. Photosynthesis of individual field-grown cotton leaves during ontogeny. Photosynthesis Res., 23: 163-170.