Data quantization effects in CFAR signal detection

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1277-1289

  Gandhi, Prashant E ^a  

^a TEXAS INSTRUMENTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERSION; RADAR CLUTTER; RADAR INTERFERENCE; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

CONSTANT FALSE ALARM RATE (CFAR); DATA QUANTIZATION EFFECTS;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 0030262881     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/7.543849     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Wciss, M. (1982) Analysis of some modified cell-averaging CFAR processors in multiple-target situations. fEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-18 (Jan. 1982), 102-113.
2. Gandhi, P. P., and Kassam, S. A. (1988) Analysis of some CFAR processors in nonhomogeneous background. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 24 (July 1988), 427-445.
3. Gandhi, P. P., and Kassam, S. A. (1994) Optimality of the cell averaging CFAR detector. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 40 (July 1994), 1226-1228.
4. Rohling, H. (1983) Radar CFAR thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations. IEEE 'transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-19 (July 1983), 608-621.
5. Skolnik, M. L. (1980) Introduction to Radar Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
6. Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W. (1989) Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-I lall, 1989.
7. David, H. A. (1981) Order Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1981.
8. Gandlii, P. P. (1992) Quantization of ordered data. In Proceeding? of the International Conference an Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IV (1992), 437-440.