The synergistic application of CBR to IR

Artificial Intelligence Review

Volumn 10, Issue 5-6, 1996, Pages 441-475

  Rissland, Edwina L ^a   Daniels, Jody J ^a  

^a The Manning College of Information and Computer Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

AI; Automatic query generation; Hybrid CBR IR; Hypo style CBR; Inquery; IR

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; QUEUEING THEORY; STANDARDS; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; TERMINOLOGY;

AUTOMATIC QUERY GENERATION; SYNERGETIC APPLICATION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0030261099     PISSN: 02692821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00130694     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ashley, K. D. (1990). Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypothetical. M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, MA.
2. Aleven, V. & Ashley, K. D. (1993). What Law Students Need to Know to WIN. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-93), 152-161. Amsterdam: ACM Press.
3. Bing, J. (1987). Designing Text Retrieval Systems for "Conceptual Searching". Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), 43-51. Boston: ACM Press.
4. Blair, D. C. & Maron, M. E. (1985). An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document-Retrieval System. Communications of the ACM 28(3): 289-299.
5. Callan, J. P., Croft, W., B. & Harding, S. M. (1992). The INQUERY Retrieval System. In Tjoa, A. M. & Ramos, I. (eds.) Database and Expert Systems Applications: Proceedings of the International Conference, 78-83. Springer Verlag: Valencia, Spain.
6. Creecy, R. H., Masand, B. M., Smith, S. J. & Waltz, D. L. (1992). Trading MIPs and Memory for Knowledge Engineering. Communications of the ACM 34(8): 48-64.
7. Croft, W. B., Cook, R. & Wilder, D. (1995). Providing Government Information on the Internet: Experiences with THOMAS. Proceedings Second International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, 19-24. June, Austin, TX.
8. Croft, W. B. & Das, R. (1990). Experiments with Query Acquisition and Use in Document Retrieval Systems. In 13th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 349-365.
9. Croft, W. B., Turtle, H. R. & Lewis, D. D. (1991). The Use of Phrases and Structured Queries in Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 32-45. Chicago, IL: ACM Press.
10. Daniels, J. J. & Rissland, E. L. (1995). A Case-Based Approach to Intelligent Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 238-245. Seattle, WA: ACM Press.
11. Dick, J. (1987). Conceptual Retrieval and Case Law. Proceedings, First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), 106-115. Boston: ACM Press.
12. Gelbart, D. & Smith, J. C. (1991). Beyond Boolean Search: FLEXICON, A Legal Text-Based Intelligent System. Proceedings, Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), 225-234. Oxford: ACM Press.
13. Gelbart, D. & Smith, J.C. (1993). FLEXICON: An Evaluation of a Statistical Ranking Model Adapted to Intelligent Legal Text Management. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-93), 142-151. ACM Press.
14. Golding, A. R. & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1991). Improving Rule-based Systems Through Case-Based Reasoning. Proceedings, Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-91), 22-27. Anaheim.
15. Goodman, M. (1991). Prism: A Case-based Telex Classifier, In Rappaport, A. and Smith, R. (eds.) Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence - 2, 25-37. AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA.
16. Hafner, C. D. (1987a). Conceptual Organization of Case Law Knowledge Bases. Proceedings, First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), 35-42. Boston: ACM Press.
17. Hafner, C. D. (1987b). An Information Retrieval System Based on a Computer Model of Legal Knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan. Republished by UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor, MI (1981).
18. Hafner, C. D. & Wise, V. J. (1993). SmartLaw: Adapting "Classic" Expert System Techniques for the Legal Research Domain. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-93), 133-142. Amsterdam: ACM Press.
19. Haines, D. & Croft, W. B. (1993). Relevance Feedback and Inference Networks. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 347-356. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM.
20. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Mital, V. & Johnson, L. (1992). Advanced Information Systems for Lawyers. Chapman and Hall: London.
22. Rissland, E. L. & Ashley, K. D. (1987). A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law. Proceedings First International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL-87), 60-66. Boston: ACM Press.
23. Rissland, E. L. & Daniels, J. J. (1995). Using CBR to Drive IR. In Proceedings, 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), 400-407. Montreal, Canada.
24. Rissland, E. L., Daniels, J. J., Rubinstein, Z. & Skalak, D. B. (1993). Case-based Diagnostic Analysis in a Blackboard Architecture. Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93), 66-72. Washington, D.C.
25. Rissland, E. L. & Skalak, D. B. (1991). CABARET: Statutory Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (IJMMS) (34): 839-887.
26. Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B. & Friedman, M. T. (1994a). Heuristic Harvesting of Information for Case-Based Argument. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), 36-43. Seattle.
27. Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B. & Friedman, M. T. (1994b). BankXX: Supporting Legal Arguments through Heuristic Retrieval. TR 94-76, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
28. To appear in Artificial Intelligence and Law - An International Journal.
29. Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B. & Friedman, M. T. (1995). Evaluating a Legal Argument Program: The BankXX Experiments. TR 95-30, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Submitted.
30. Rissland, E. L., Valcare, E. M & Ashley, K. D. (1984). Explaining and Arguing with Examples. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-84), 288-294. Austin.
31. Rose, D. E. & Belew, R. K. (1991). A Connectionist and Symbolic Hybrid for Improving Legal Research. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 1-33.
32. Rose, D. E. (1994). A Symbolic and Connectionist Approach to Legal Information Retrieval. Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Salton, G. (1989). Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley.
34. Skalak, D. B. & Rissland, E. L. (1992). Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law - An International Journal, 3-44. Kluwer.
35. Stanfill, C. & Waltz, D. L. (1986). Toward Memory-Based Reasoning. Communications of the ACM 29(12): 1213-1228.
36. Turtle, H. (1994). Natural Language vs. Boolean Query Evaluation: A Comparison of Retrieval Performance. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 212-220. Dublin, Ireland: ACM Press.
37. Turtle, H. R. & Croft, W. B. (1991). Evaluation of an Inference Network-Based Retrieval Model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9(3): 187-222.