|
|
Volumn 3, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 855-858
|
|
Clinical assessment of dry laser-processed film versus traditional wet-processed film with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
ECHOGRAPHY;
LASER;
METHODOLOGY;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
RADIOLOGY;
ROC CURVE;
X RAY FILM;
LASERS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
ROC CURVE;
TECHNOLOGY, RADIOLOGIC;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
X-RAY FILM;
|
|
EID: 0030256403
PISSN: 10766332
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80277-7 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (7)
|
|
References (0)
|
