|
|
Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 261-262
|
|
End-of-life decisions and the law.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AIREDALE NHS TRUST V. BLAND;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
EDITORIAL;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LONG TERM CARE;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
AIREDALE NHS TRUST V. BLAND;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ADULT;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
SCOTLAND;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0030254472
PISSN: 03066800
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.5.261 Document Type: Editorial |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|
