Effects of practice on identification of multidimensional stimuli

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 435-448

  Shieh, Kong King ^a   Lai, Chien Jung ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; RECALL; STUDENT;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME; STUDENTS;

EID: 0030253334     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.435     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ALLPORT, D. A. (1971) Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 104-108.
2. BREBNER, J. (1973) S-R compatibility and changes in RT with practice. Acta Psychologica, 37, 93-106.
3. CHRIST, E. R., & CORSO, G. M. (1983) The effects of extended practice on the evaluation of visual display codes. Human Factors, 25, 71-84.
4. CRAIK, F. I. M., & TULVING, E. (1975) Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
5. HARRIS, C. S., & HABER, R. N. (1963) Selective attention and coding in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 328-333.
6. JOHNSTON, W. A., & HEINZ, S. P. (1978) Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 420-435.
7. JUBIS, R. M. T. (1990) The effectiveness of color-coding in visual displays: does practice make a difference? In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Human factors Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. Pp. 1519-1523.
8. LAPPIN, J. S. (1967) Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 321-328.
9. LAWRENCE, D. H., & LABERGE, D. L. (1956) Relationship between recognition accuracy and order of reporting stimulus dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 12-18.
10. OSGA, G. (1982) An evaluation of identification performance for Raster Scan generated NTDS symbology (Final Report). San Diego, CA: Naval Ocean Systems Center.
11. PEW, R. W. (1979) Secondary tasks and workload measurement. In N. Moray (Ed.), Mental workload: its theory and measurement. New York: Plenum. Pp. 23-28.
12. SANDERS, M. S., & MCCORMICK, E. J. (1993) Human factors in engineering and design. (7th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 78-80.
13. SHEA, C. H., KOHL, R., & INDERMILL, C. (1990) Contextual interference: contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145-157.
14. SHIEH, K-K., LAI, C-J., & ELLINGSTAD, V. S. (1996) Effect of report order, identification method and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 99-111.
15. TEICHNER, W. H., & KREBS, M. J. (1974) Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
16. TSANG, P. S., & BATES, W. E. (1990) Resource allocation and object displays. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Human factors Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. Pp. 1484-1488.
17. WELFORD, A. T. (1980) Choice reaction time: basic concepts. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times. London: Academic Press. Pp. 73-128.