Basic attributes of trade and environment: What do the numbers tell us?

Ecological Economics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 19-33

  Lee, James R ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data; Endangered species; Environment; Law; Methodology; Trade

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHODOLOGICAL EVALUATION; TRADE IMPACT;

EID: 0030251221     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00068-7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bilder, R.B., 1975. International Environmental Disputes. In: Recueil des Cours Academie de Droit International. The Hague, p. 153.
2. Charnovitz, S., 1993. A Taxonomy of International Trade Measures. Georgetown Int. Environ. Law Rev., 6/1: Winter.
3. Hufbauer, G.C., Berliner, D.T. and Elliot, K.A., 1986. Trade Protection in the United States: 31 Case Studies. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
4. Lee, J.R., 1991. Trade in Wood and Wood-Based Products: Trends, Forecasts, Characteristics, and Policies. U.S. Government Printing Office, April.
5. Lee, J.R., 1994. Process and Product: Making the Link Between Trade and the Environment. Int. Environ. Affairs, 6: 320-347.
6. Lee, J.R., 1995. The Trade-Environment Nexus in the Formation of a Northeast Asian Regional Economy. Workshop on Asian Pacific Regional Integration, Graduate School of International Studies, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea, December 12-13.
7. Office of Technology Assessment, 1992. Trade and Environment: Conflicts and Opportunities. Office of Technology Assessment Background Paper. Washington, DC, May.
8. Stevens, C., 1993. The Environmental Effects of Trade. World Econ. 16: 439-451.