A comparison of sequential and spatial displays in a complex monitoring task

Human Factors

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 464-483

  Konrad, Christopher M ^a,b   Kramer, Arthur F ^a   Watson, Stephen E ^a,c   Weber, Timothy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c Air Force Materiel Command   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX MONITORING TASK; RAPID COMMUNICATION DISPLAY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

COMMUNICATION; HUMAN REACTION TIME; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MONITORING;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MONITORING; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0030250043     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872096778702015     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bourne, L. E., Young, S. R., & Angell, L. S. (1986). Resource allocation in reading: An interactive approach. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 194, 155-176.
2. Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
3. Bouma, H., & deVoogd, A. H. (1974) On the control of eye saccades in reading. Vision Research, 14, 273-284.
4. Chen, H. C. (1986). Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading. Memory and Cognition, 14, 202-208.
5. Cocklin, T. G, Ward, N. J., Chen, H. C., & Juola, J. F. (1984). Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments. Memory and Cognition, 12, 431-442.
6. Fitts, P M, & Seeger, C. M. (1953). SR compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
7. Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
8. Gopher, D., & Raij, D. (1988). Typing with a two-hand chord keyboard: Will the QWERTY become obsolete? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 601-609.
9. Gopher, D., Karis, D., & Koenig, W. (1985). The representation of movement schemas in long-term memory: Lessons from the acquisition of a transcription skill. Acta Psychologica, 60, 105-134.
10. Intraub, H. (1985). Visual dissociation An illusory conjunction of pictures and forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 431-442.
11. Intraub, H. (1989). Illusory conjunctions of forms, objects, and scenes during rapid serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 98-109
12. Joseph, K. M., & Uhlarik, J. (1992). The effects of legibility and display size on performance for RAP COM and spatial display formats. In Proceeding of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1388-1391). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13. Juola, J. F. (1988). The use of computer displays to improve reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 87-95.
14. Juola, J. F., Haugh, D., Trast, S., Ferraro, F. R., & Liebhaber, M. (1987). Reading with and without eye movements. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 499-508). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Juola, J. F., Ward, N. J., & McNamara, T. (1982). Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words and text Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 111, 208-227.
16. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
17. Kantowitz, B., Triggs, T., & Barnes, V. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility and human factors. In R. Proctor & T. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 365-388). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
19. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M.C. (1989). Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement. Memory and Cognition, 17, 117-124.
20. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M.C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
21. Loveless, N. E. (1963). Direction of motion stereotypes: A review. Ergonomics, 5, 357-383.
22. Masson, M E. J. (1986). Comprehension of rapidly presented sentences: The mind is quicker than the eye. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 588-604.
23. Matin, E., & Boff, K. (1988). Information transfer rate with serial and simultaneous visual display formats. Human Factors, 30, 171-180.
24. Matin, E., Boff, K., & Donovan, R. (1987). Raising control/ display efficiency with rapid communication display technology. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 258-262). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
25. McLean, J. P., Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1982). Combining attributes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 171-186.
26. Osgood, S. S., Boff, K. R., & Donovan, R S. (1988). Rapid communication display technology efficiency in a multitask environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1395-1399). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
27. Payne, D. G, & Lang, V. A. (1991). Visual monitoring with spatially versus temporally distributed displays. Human Factors, 33, 443-458.
28. Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F., & Harris, C. (1980). Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 395-418). New York: Academic.
29. Raij, D., Gopher, D., & Kimchi, R. (1987). Perceptual and motor determinants of efficient data entry. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 820-824). Santa Monica, CA. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
30. Raygor, R. (1974). An investigation of the relationship between eye movements and comprehension in fluent reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
31. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
32. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
33. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
34. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1986). Illusory words: The roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 3-17.
35. Uhlarik, J., & Joseph, K. M. (1992). Spatial and temporal (RAP COM) visual display formats and the proximity compatibility principle. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1383-1387). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
36. Uhiarik, J., Joseph, K. M., & Renfro, M. D. (1991). Effects of concurrent information load on serial and simultaneous visual display formats. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1527-1531). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
37. Ward, N., & Juola, J. (1982). Reading with and without eye movements: Reply to Just, Carpenter and Wooley. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 111, 239-241.
38. Young, S. R. (1984). RSVP: A task, reading aid, and research tool. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 121-124.