Dose- and conditioning trial-dependent ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in Swiss-Webster mice

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 117-123

  Risinger, Fred O ^a   Oakes, Roger A ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Locomotor activity; Mice; Place conditioning; Reward

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; SENSITIZATION; TACTILE STIMULATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0030249140     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(96)00069-X     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. 1. Asin, K. E.; Wirtshafter, D.; Tabakoff, B. Failure to establish a conditioned place preference with ethanol in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 22:169-173; 1985.
2. 2. Black, R. W.; Albiniak, T.; Davis, M.; Schumpert, J. A preference in rats for cues associated with intoxication. Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 2:423-424; 1973.
3. 3. Bozarth, M. A. Conditioned place preference: A parametric analysis using systemic heroin injections. In: Bozarth, M. A., ed. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. New York: Springer Verlag; 1987:241-273.
4. 4. Bozarth, M. A. Evidence for the rewarding effects of ethanol using the conditioned place preference method. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 35:485-487; 1990.
5. 5. Carr, G. D.; Fibiger, H. C.; Phillips, A. G. Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In: Liebman, J. M.; Cooper, S. J., eds. Neuropharmacological basis of reward. New York: Oxford; 1989:264-319.
6. 6. Crabbe, J. C.; Young, E. R.; Deutsch, C. M.; Tam, B. R.; Kosobud, A. Mice genetically selected for differences in open-field activity after ethanol. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 27:577-581; 1987.
7. 7. Crabbe, J. C.; Phillips, T. J.; Cunningham, C. L.; Belknap, J. K. Genetic determinants of ethanol reinforcement. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 654:302-310; 1992.
8. 8. Cunningham, C. L. Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 120:28-41; 1995.
9. 9. Cunningham, C. L. Flavor and location aversions produced by ethanol. Behav. Neural. Biol. 27:362-367; 1979.
10. 10. Cunningham, C. L. Spatial aversion conditioning with ethanol. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 14:263-264; 1981.
11. 11. Cunningham, C. L. Pavlovian drug conditioning. In: van Haaren F., ed. Methods in behavioral pharmacology. New York: Elsevier; 1993:349-381.
12. 12. Cunningham, C. L.; Hallett, C. L.; Niehus, D. R.; Hunter, J. S.; Mouth, L.; Risinger, F. O. Assessment of ethanol's hedonic effects in mice selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced hypothermia. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 105:84-92; 1991.
13. 13. Cunningham, C. L.; Neihus, D. R.; Malott, D. H.; Prather, L. K. Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 107:385-393; 1992.
14. 14. Cunningham, C. L.; Malott, D. H.; Dickinson, S. D.; Risinger, F. O. Haloperidol does not alter expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Behav. Brain. Res. 50:1-5; 1992.
15. 15. Cunningham, C.L.; Neihus, J. S.; Noble, D. Species difference in sensitivity to ethanol's hedonic effects. Alcohol 10:97-102; 1993.
16. 16. Cunningham, C. L.; Dickinson, S. D.; Okorn, D. M. Naloxone facilitates extinction but does not affect acquisition or expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 3:330-343; 1995.
17. 17. Cunningham, C. L.; Noble, D. Methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference or aversion depending on dose and presence of drug. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 654:431-433; 1992.
18. 18. Cunningham, C. L.; Noble, D. Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: Role in sensitization and conditioned place preference. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 43:307-313; 1992.
19. 19. Cunningham, C. L.; Prather, L. K. Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice: Role of conditioning trial duration. Anim. Learn. Behav. 20:187-194; 1992.
20. 20. Dudek, B. C.; Phillips, T. J.; Hahn, M. E. Genetic analyses of the biphasic nature of the alcohol dose - response curve. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 15:262-269; 1991.
21. 21. Frye, G. D.; Breese, G. R. An evaluation of the locomotor stimulating action of ethanol in rats and mice. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 75:372-379; 1981.
22. 22. Gauvin, D. V.; Holloway, F. A. Historical factors in the development of EtOH-conditioned place preference. Alcohol 9:1-7; 1992.
23. 23. Hoffman, D. C. The use of place conditioning in studying the neuropharmacology of drug reinforcement. Brain Res. Bull. 23: 373-387; 1989.
24. 24. Keppel, G. Design and analysis: A researchers handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1991:167.
25. 25. Lawley, S. I.; Kantack, K. M. Postconditioning effects of magnesium on cocaine conditioned place preference in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 36:531-538; 1990.
26. 26. Linakis, J. G.; Cunningham, C. L. Effects of concentration of ethanol injected intraperitoneally on taste aversion, body temperature, and activity. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 64:61-65; 1979.
27. 27. Lubow, R. E. Latent inhibition. Psychol. Bull. 79:398-407; 1973.
28. 28. Marglin, S. H.; MacKechnie, D. K.; Mattie, M. E.; Hui, Y.; Reid, L. D. Ethanol with small doses of morphine establishes a conditioned place preference. Alcohol 5:309-313; 1988.
29. 29. Masur, J.; Boerngen, R. The excitatory component of ethanol in mice: A chronic study. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 13:777-780; 1980.
30. 30. Masur, J.; Oliveira De Souza, M. L.; Zwicker, A. P. The excitatory effect of ethanol: Absence in rats, no tolerance and increased sensitivity in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24:1225-1228; 1986.
31. 5-enkephalinamide into the ventral tegmental area. Behav. Brain Res. 5:225-229; 1982.
32. 32. Phillips, T. J.; Huson, M.; Gwiazdon, C.; Burkhart-Kasch, S.; Shen, E. H. Effects of acute and repeated ethanol exposures on the locomotor activity of BXD recombinant inbred mice. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 19:269-278; 1995.
33. 33. Phillips, T. J.; Crabbe, J. C. Behavioral studies of genetic differences in alcohol action. In: Crabbe, J. C.; Harris, R. A., eds. The genetic basis of alcohol and drug actions. New York: Plenum Press; 1991;25-104.
34. 34. Reid, L. D.; Hunter, G. A.; Beaman, C. M.; Hubbell, C. L. Toward understanding ethanol's capacity to be reinforcing: A conditioned place preference following injections of ethanol. Phamacol. Biochem. Behav. 22:483-187; 1985.
35. 2 antagonists on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 18: 517; 1994.
36. 36. Risinger, F. O.; Cunningham, C. L. Genetic differences in ethanol-induced hyperglycemia and conditioned taste aversion. Life Sci. 50:PL113-PL118; 1992.
37. 37. Risinger, F. O.; Oakes, R. A. Nicotine-induced conditioned place preference and conditioned place aversion in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 51:457-461; 1995.
38. 38. Risinger, F. O.; Dickinson, S. D.; Cunningham, C. L. Haloperidol reduces ethanol-induced motor stimulation but not conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 107:453-456; 1992.
39. 39. Risinger, F. O.; Malott, D. H.; Riley, A. L.; Cunningham, C. L. Effect of Ro 15-4513 on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 43:97-102; 1992.
40. 40. Risinger, F. O.; Malott, D. H.; Prather, L. K.; Niehus, D. R.; Cunningham, C. L. Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 116:207-216; 1994.
41. 41. Rossi, N. A.; Reid, L. D. Affective states associated with morphine injections. Physiol. Psychol. 4:269-274; 1976.
42. 42. Sherman, J. E.; Hickis, C. F.; Rice, A. G.; Rusiniak, K. W.; Garcia, J. Preferences and aversions for stimuli paired with ethanol in hungry rats. Anim. Learn. Behav. 11:101-106; 1983.
43. 43. Sherman, J. E.; Jorenby, D. E.; Baker, T. B. Classical conditioning with alcohol: Acquired preferences and aversions, tolerance, and urges/craving. In: Chaudron, C. D.; Wilkinson, D. A., eds. Theories on alcoholism. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation: Toronto; 1988:173-237.
44. 44. Stewart, R. B.; Grupp, L. A. An investigation of the interaction between the reinforcing properties of food and ethanol using the place preference paradigm. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. 5:609-613; 1981.
45. 45. Stewart, R. B.; Grupp, L. A. Some determinants of the motivational properties of ethanol in the rat: Concurrent adminstration of food or social stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 87: 43-50; 1985.
46. 46. Stewart, R. B.; Grupp, L. A. Conditioned place aversion mediated by orally self-administered ethanol in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24:1369-1375; 1986.
47. 47. Stewart, R. B.; Grupp, L. A. Conditioned place aversion mediated by self-administered ethanol in the rat: A consideration of blood ethanol levels. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 32:431-137; 1989.
48. 48. Swerdlow, N. R.; Gilbert, D.; Koob, G. F. Conditioned drug effects on spatial preference: Critical evaluation. In: Boulton, A. A.; Baker, G. B.; Greenshaw, A. J., eds. Psychopharmacology (Neuromethods Volume 13). Clifton NJ: Humana; 1989:399-446.
49. 49. Tabakoff, B.; Hoffman, P. L. A neurobiological theory of alcoholism. In: Chaudron, C. D.; Wilkinson, D. A., eds. Theories on alcoholism. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation; 1988: 29-72.
50. 50. van der Kooy, D. Place conditioning: A simple and effective method for assessing the motivational properties of drugs. In: Bozarth, M. A., ed. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. New York: Springer Verlag; 1987:229-240.
51. 51. van der Kooy, D.; O'Shaughnessy, M.; Mucha, R. F.; Kalant, H. Motivational properties of ethanol in naive rats as studied by place conditioning. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 19:441-445; 1983.
52. 52. Wise, R. A.; Bozarth, M. A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94:469-492; 1987.