The influence of target angular velocity on visual latency difference determined using the rotating Pulfrich effect

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 18, 1996, Pages 2865-2872

  Nickalls, R W D ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Illusion; Latency; Pulfrich; Stereopsis; Tracking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VELOCITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0030248617     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00039-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barlow H.B., McNaughton P.A. Illusory curvature caused by retinal delay. Journal of Physiology, London. 308:1980;11P-12P.
2. Carney T., Paradiso M.A., Freeman R.D. A physiological correlate of the Pulfrich effect in cortical neurons of the cat. Vision Research. 29:1989;155-165.
3. Enright J.T. Distortions of apparent velocity: A new optical illusion. Science. 168:1970;464-467.
4. Fröhlich F.W. Über die Abhängigkeit der Empfindungszeit and des zeitlichen Verlaufes der Gesichtsempfindung von der Intensität Dauer und Geschwindigkeit der Belichtung. Zeitung Sinnesphysiology. 55:1923;1-46.
5. Fry G.A., Hill W.W. The center of rotation of the eye. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of the American Academy of Optometry. 39:1962;581-595.
6. Harker G.S. A saccadic suppression explanation of the Pulfrich phenomenon. Perception and Psychophysics. 2:1967;423-426.
7. Hawken M.J., Gegenfurtner K.R., Tang C. Contrast dependence of colour and luminance in human vision. Nature. 367:1994;268-270.
8. Hofeldt A.J., Leavitt J., Behrens M.M. Pulfrich stereoillusion phenomenon in serous sensory retinal detachment of the macula. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 100:1985;576-580.
9. Holz J. Der Stereoeffekt Pulfrich's und die Empfindungszeit. Zeitung Biologie. 95:1934;502-516.
10. Julesz B., White B. Short term visual memory and the Pulfrich phenomenon. Nature. 222:1969;639-641.
11. Larkin E.B., Dutton G.N., Heron G. Impaired perception of moving objects after minor injuries to the eye and midface: The Pulfrich phenomenon. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 32:1994;360-362.
12. Lee D.N. A stroboscopic stereophenomenon. Vision Research. 10:1970;587-593.
13. Levick W.R., Cleland B.G., Coombs J.S. On the apparent orbit of the Pulfrich pendulum. Vision Research. 12:1972;1381-1388.
14. Lit A. The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of binocular differences of intensity at various levels of illumination. American Journal of Psychology. 62:1949;159-181.
15. Lit A. The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of target velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception. 59:1960;165-175.
16. Lit A. Effect of target velocity in a frontal plane on binocular spatial localisation at photopic retinal illuminance levels. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 50:1960;970-973.
17. Lit A. Magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of target thickness. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 50:1960;321-327.
18. Lit A. Equidistance settings at photopic retinal illuminance levels as a function of target velocity in a frontal plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 54:1964;83-88.
19. Lit A., Hyman A. The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of distance of observation. American Journal of Optometry. 28:1951;564-580.
20. Lythgoe R.J. Some observations on the rotating pendulum. Nature. 141:1938;474.
21. Morgan M.J. Stereoillusion based on visual persistence. Nature. 256:1975;639-640.
22. Morgan M.J., Thompson P. Apparent motion and the Pulfrich effect. Perception. 4:1975;3-18.
23. Nickalls R.W.D. The rotating Pulfrich effect, and a new method of determining visual latency differences. Vision Research. 26:1986;367-372.
24. Nickalls R.W.D. A new line and conic theorem having an interesting visual correlate. Mathematical Gazette. 70:1986;27-29.
25. Pääkkönen A.K., Morgan M.J. Effects of motion on blur discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America (A). 3:1994;992-1002.
26. Pulfrich C. Die Stereoskopie im Dienste der isochromen und heterochromen Photometrie. Naturwissenschaften. 10:1992;553-564.
27. Prestrude A.M., Baker H.D. New method of measuring visual-perceptual latency differences. Perception and Psychophysics. 4:1968;152-154.
28. Ross J., Hogben J.H. The Pulfrich effect and short-term memory in stereopsis. Vision Research. 15:1975;1289-1290.
29. Sokol S. The Pulfrich stereo-illusion as an index of optic nerve dysfunction. Survey of Ophthalmology. 20:1976;432-434.
30. Spiegler J.B. Distance, size, and velocity changes during the Pulfrich effect. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics. 60:1983;902-907.
31. Spiegler J.B. Apparent path of a Pulfrich target as a function of the slope of its plane of motion: A theoretical note. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics. 63:1986;209-216.
32. Standing L.G., Dodwell P.C., Lang D. Dark adaption and the Pulfrich effect. Perception and Psychophysics. 4:1968;118-120.
33. Trincker D. Hell-Dunkel-Anpassung und raumliches Sehen. Pflügers Archives gesicht Physiology. 257:1953;48-69.
34. Weale R.A. Theory of the Pulfrich effect. Ophthalmologica. 128:1954;380-388.
35. Williams J.M., Lit A. Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Research. 23:1983;171-179.
36. Wilson G.S. An investigation of the Pulfrich effect. British Journal of Physiological Optics. 22:1965;208-237.