Objective measurement of contact lens-induced conjunctival redness

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 73, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 595-605

  Guillon, Michel ^a,b   Shah, Dipti ^a  

^a Contact Lens Research Consultants ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

clinical variation; contact lenses; image analysis; objective quantification; ocular redness

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; TRANSPUTERS; VIDEO RECORDING;

BULBAR CONJUNCTIVE; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; OCULAR REDNESS;

CONTACT LENSES;

ARTICLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA LIMBUS; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SOFT CONTACT LENS;

EID: 0030246950     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199609000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Guillon JP, Guillon M. The role of tears in contact lens performance and its measurement. In: Ruben M, Guillon M, eds. Contact Lens Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994: 453-83.
2. Holden BA. The ocular response to contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:717-33.
3. Martin DK, Boulos J, Gan J, Gavriel K, Harvey P. A unifying parameter to describe the clinical mechanics of hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:87-91.
4. Guillon JP, Guillon M, Malgouyres S. Corneal dessication staining with hydrogel lenses, tear film and contact lens factors. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991;10:343-9.
5. Mertz GW, Holden BA. Clinical implications of extended wear research. Can J Optom 1981;43:203-5.
6. Bron AJ, Menger LS, Davey CC. The normal conjunctiva and its response to inflammation. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985;104:424-35.
7. McMonnies CE, Chapman-Davies A, Holden BA. The vascular response to contact lens wear. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982;59:795-9.
8. Guillon M, Bilton S, Bleshoy H, Guillon JP, Lydon DPM. Limbal changes associated with hydrogel contact lens wear. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1985;8:15-9.
9. Guillon M, Guillon JP, Shah D. Visual performance stability of disposable contact lenses. ICLC 1993;20:7-17.
10. Guillon M, Guillon JP, Shah D, Williams J. Visual performance stability of planned replacement daily wear contact lenses. Contactologia 1995;17E:118-30.
11. Davies IP. The Limbus Revisited. Br Contact Lens Assoc Scientific Meetings 1989:32-5.
12. McMonnies CW, Chapman-Davies A. Assessment of conjunctival hyperaemia in contact lens wearers. Part I. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:246-50.
13. McMonnies CW, Chapman-Davies A. Assessment of conjunctival hyperaemia in contact lens wearers. Part II. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:251-5.
14. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Conjunctival hyperaemia in noncontact lens wearers. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1991;69:799-801.
15. Hayward JTJ. Repeatability and accuracy. London Mechanical Engineering Publications, 1977.
16. Winner BJ. Factorial experiments, computational procedures and numerical examples. In: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971: 431-505.
17. Zar JM. Multiple Comparisons in Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984:185-205.
18. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical gradings and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-32.
19. Terry R, Sweeney D, Wong R, Papas E. Variability of clinical investigators in contact lens research. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 12(Suppl):16.
20. Guillon M, Guillon JP. Disposable contact lenses: contact lens and tear film interactions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:1114.