Rhetorical vs. nonrhetorical allo-repetition: The case of Romanian interrogatives

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 321-354

  Dumitrescu, Domniţa ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030243458     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00052-6     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baciu, Ileana, 1983. The function of minor questions in conversation. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique: Cahiers de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 20: 15-19.
2. Bolinger, Dwight, 1957. Interrogative structures of American English: The direct question. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
3. Bolinger, Dwight, 1989. Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Brown, Gillian, Karen L. Currie and Joanne Kenworthy, 1980. Questions of intonation. Baltimore, MA: University Park Press.
5. Bunt, Harry, 1981. Conversational principles in question answer dialogues. In: D. Krallmann and G. Stickel, eds., Zur Theorie der Frage, 119-141. Tübingen: Narr.
6. Carlson, Lauri, 1983. Dialogue games: An approach to discourse analysis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
7. Chafe, Wallace L., 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8. Chang, Suk-Jin, 1982. Non-standard questions: Polarity and contrast. Language Research 18: 157-170.
9. Chisholm, William, Jr., Louis T. Millic and John A.C. Greppin, eds., 1984. Interrogativity: A colloquium on the grammar, typology, and pragmatics of questions in seven diverse languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
10. Comorovski, Ileana, 1989. Discourse and the syntax of multiple constituent questions. Dissertation, Cornell University, New York.
11. Comorovski, Ileana, 1996. Interrogative phrases and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Coulthard, Malcom, 1992. The significance of intonation in discourse. In: M. Coulthard, ed., Advances in spoken discourse analysis, 35-49. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Coulthard, Malcolm and David Brazil, 1992. Exchange structure. In: M. Coulthard, ed., Advances in spoken discourse analysis, 50-78. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Dascal, Marcelo, 1985. The relevance of misunderstanding. In: Marcelo Dascal and Hubert Cuyckens, eds., Dialogue: An interdisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Dascǎlu, Laurenţia, 1985. Întrebǎrile ecou şi intonaţia lor în limba românǎ. Studii şi Cercetǎri Lingvistice 36: 299-306.
16. Diller, Anne-Marie, 1984. La pragmatique des questions et des réponses. Tübingen: Narr.
17. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1990. The grammar of echo questions in Spanish and Romanian: Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. University of Southern California dissertation. [To appear, in a revised version, at Peter Lang, New York.]
18. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1991. General considerations about echo questions in Spanish and Romanian: Towards defining the concept. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 3-4: 141-167 (Part I); 5-6: 279-315 (Part II).
19. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1991. General considerations about echo questions in Spanish and Romanian: Towards defining the concept. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 3-4: 141-167 (Part I); 5-6: 279-315 (Part II).
20. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1992. On the discourse function of questions repeating questions in Romanian. Paper presented at the Modern Language Association of America Convention (Discussion Group on Comparative Romance Linguistics), New York.
21. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1993a. The rhechorical question in Romanian. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
22. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1993b. Función pragma-discursiva de la interrogación ecoica usada como respuesta en español. In: Henk Haverkate, Kees Hengeveld and Gijs Mulder, eds., Aproximaciones pragmalingüísticas al español, 51-85. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi (Diálogos hispánicos 12).
23. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1995a. On the syntactic structure and discourse function of multiple constituent repetitive and nonrepetitive questions in Romanian. In: Coman Lupu and Lorenzo Renzi, eds., Studi rumeni e romanzi. Ommaggio a Florica Dimitrescu e Alexandu Niculescu, 86-114. 3 Vols. Padova: Unipress.
24. Dumitrescu, Domniţa, 1995b. The role of context in the interpretation of rhechorical questions. Paper presented at the Colloquium: Questions in Context, organized at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Long Beach, CA.
25. Escandell Vidal, María Victoria, 1984. La interrogación retórica. Dicenda 3: 9-37.
26. Ferrara, Kathleen, 1994. Repetition as rejoinder in therapeutic discourse: Echoing and mirroring. In: Barbara Johnstone, ed., Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Volume 2: 66-83 (Advances in discourse processes). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Fillmore, Charles, 1981. Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In: Peter Cole, ed., Radical pragmatics, 143-166. New York: Academic Press.
28. Green, Georgia M., 1989. Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Ilie, Cornelia, 1994. What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
30. Jefferson, Gail, 1972. Side sequences. In: D. Sudnow, ed., Studies in social interaction, 294-338. New York: The Free Press.
31. Jespersen, J.O., 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin. [Reprinted by the Norton Library in 1965.]
32. Johns-Lewis, Catherine, ed., 1986. Intonation in discourse. London and San Diego: Croom Helm and College-Hill Press, Inc.
33. Johnstone, Barbara et al., 1994. Repetition in discourse: A dialogue, In: Barbara Johnstone, ed., Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Vol. 1: 1-20 (Advances in discourse processes). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Levinson, Stephen C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Mallinson, Graham, 1986. Rumanian. London: Croom Helm.
36. McLaughlin, Margaret, 1984. Conversation: How talk is organized (Vol. 3 of Sage Series in Interpersonal Communication). Beverly Hills, London and New Dehli: Sage.
37. Merrit, Marylin, 1976. On question following question in service encounters. Language in Society 5: 315-357.
38. Mey, Jacob, 1994. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. [1994 third revised printing.]
39. Milner, J. and J.C. Milner, 1975. Interrogation, reprise, dialogue. In: Julia Kristeva, J. Milner and Nicolas Ruwet, eds., Langue, discours, société: Pour Emile Benveniste, 122-148. Paris: Seuil.
40. Norwood Pope, Emily, 1976. Questions and answers in English. The Hague: Mouton.
41. Parker, Franck and John Pickeral, 1985. Echo questions in English. American Speech 60: 337-347.
42. Pomeranz, Anita, 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 57-101. Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
43. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik, 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
44. Sacks, Harvey, 1987. On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation, 54-69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
45. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson, 1978. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In: Jim Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 7-55. New York: Academic Press.
46. Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks, 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361-383.
47. Schmidt-Radefeldt, Jürgen, 1977. On so-called 'rhetorical' questions. Journal of Pragmatics 1: 375-392.
48. Simpson, JoEllen M., 1994. Regularized intonation in conversational repetition. In: Barbara Johnstone, ed., Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Vol. 2: 41-49 (Advances in discourse processes). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Sobin, Nicholas, 1990. On the syntax of English echo questions. Lingua 81: 141-167.
50. Stenström, Anna-Brita, 1984. Questions and responses in English conversation. Malmö: Liber Förlag.
51. Tannen, Deborah, 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Tsui, Amy, 1992. A functional description of questions. In: M. Coulthard, ed., Advances in spoken discourse analysis, 89-110. London and New York: Routledge.
53. Tsui, Amy B.M., 1994. English conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Wunderlich, Dieter, 1986. Echofragen. Studium Linguistik 20: 44-62.