|
|
Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 245-250
|
|
The controversy over retrospective moral judgment
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RADIATION EXPERIMENTS;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COLD WAR;
COMPENSATION;
CONFLICT;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICS;
EVALUATION;
GOVERNMENT;
GROUP PROCESS;
HISTORY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
PERSONNEL;
POLICY;
POLITICS;
RADIATION;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RADIATION EXPERIMENTS;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COLD WAR;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
COMPENSATION AND REDRESS;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICAL ANALYSIS;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICS;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HISTORY;
HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
HUMANS;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
MORALS;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
POLITICS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RADIATION;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
RETROSPECTIVE MORAL JUDGMENT;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0030240893
PISSN: 10546863
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1353/ken.1996.0023 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (11)
|
|
References (1)
|
