Women as sherpas: Are global summits useful for women?

Feminist Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 537-547

  Charlesworth, Hilary ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030240834     PISSN: 00463663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3178125     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. See, for example, Charlotte Bunch, "Beijing, Backlash, and the Future of Women's Human Rights," Health and Human Rights 1 (1995): 449-53.
2. Carol Smart, Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989), 5.
3. Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright, "Feminist Approaches to International Law," American Journal of International Law 85, no. 4 (1991): 613-45.
4. See also Principle 20, Rio Declaration: "Women have a vital role in environmental management and development. Their full participation is therefore essential to achieve sustainable development."
5. Sarah Z. Zerbiest and Charlotte E. Hord, "Now That the Conferences Are Over" (Letter), Reproductive Health Matters 6 (November 1995): 162.
6. See Marianne Haslegrave and John Havard, "Women's Right to Health and the Beijing Platform for Action: The Retreat from Cairo?" Health and Human Rights 1 (1995): 461-71.
7. Janet Hunt, quoted in Summary of Speeches and Outcomes of Conference, "After Beijing: Australia's Commitment to Action Conference," Canberra, December 1995, p. 5.
8. See Rebecca J. Cook, The Elimination of Sexual Apartheid: Prospects for the Fourth World Conference on Women (Washington, D.C.: American Society of International Law, 1995), 14-15.
9. See http://www.womensnet.apc.org/beijing/scoreboard.html.