Patterns of NNS student annotations when identifying areas of concern in their writing

System

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 323-336

  Storch, Neomy ^a   Tapper, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030239936     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0346-251X(96)00025-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ALLWRIGHT, J. (1988) Don't create - reformulate. ELT Documents 129, 109-116.
2. BLEY-VROMAN, R. (1986) Hypothesis testing in second language acquisition theory. Language Learning 36(3), 353-376.
3. BUSH, D. (1994) Academic Writing: Faculty Expectations and Overseas Student Performance. Proceedings from 1994 ACTA-WATESOL Conference, Perth, Western Australia.
4. CELCE-MURCIA, M. (1991) Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 25(3), 459-480.
5. CHARLES, M. (1990) Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique. ELT Journal 44(4), 286-293.
6. CHAUDRON, C. (1988) Second Language Classroom Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. COHEN, A. (1987) Student processing of feedback on their composition. In A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds), Learning Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Interational.
8. CRAWFORD. J. (1992) Student response to feedback strategies in an English for academic purposes program. ARAL 15((2)), 45-62.
9. FATHMAN, A. K. and WHALLEY, E. (1990) Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (ed.) Second Language Writing, pp. 178-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. GASS, S. M. (1991) Grammar instruction, selective attention and learning processes. In R. Phillipson et al. (eds), Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research. A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 134-141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
11. LEKI, I. (1990) Conducting from the margins: issues in written response. In B. Kroll (ed.) Second Language Writing, pp. 57-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. LEKI, I. (1991) The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24(3), 203-218.
13. PIENEMANN, M. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52-76.
14. RADECKI, P. M and SWALES, J. M. (1988) ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System 16(3), 355-365.
15. REID, J. (1994) Responding to ESL students' texts: The myth of appropriation. TESOL Quarlerty 28(2), 273-322.
16. REID, J. (1995) A response to comments on Joy Reid's "Responding to ESL students' texts: The myth of appropriation". TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 163-166.
17. ROBB, T., ROSS. S. and SHORTREED, I. (1986) Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20(1), 83-95.
18. SHARWOOD SMITH, M. (1991) Speaking to many minds: on the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 7(2), 118-132.
19. SHEPPARD, K. (1992) Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal 23(1), 103-111.
20. TOMASELLO, M. and HERRON, C. (1989) Feedback on language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 386-395.
21. ZAMEL, V. (1985) Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly 19(1), 79-103.