Academic research under siege: Toward better operational definitions of scholarship to increase effectiveness, efficiencies and productivity

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 207-229

  Bernardin, H John ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030239549     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-4822(96)90013-3     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AACSB Faculty Leadership Task Force. A Report of the AACSB Faculty Leadership Task Force. 1996;. April. Kansas City, MS.
2. Aldag R.J., Fuller S.R. Research Advisory Boards to Facilitate Organizational Research. Journal of Management Inquiry. 4:1995;41-51.
3. Allen H.L. Faculty Workload and Productivity in the 1990s: Preliminary Findings. The NEA Almanac of Higher Education. 1996;21-34 National Education Association, Washington DC.
4. Allen H.L. Workload and Productivity in an Accountability Era. The NEA Almanac of Higher Education. 1994;25-38 National Education Association, Washington, DC.
5. Anderson C.W. Prescribing the Life of the Mind: An Essay on the Purpose of the University, the Aims of Liberal Education, The Competence of Citizens, and the Cultiva. 1993;University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
6. Anderson M. Impostors in the Temple: American Intellectuals are Destroying Our Universities and Cheating Our Students of Their Future. 1992;Simon and Schuster, Boston.
7. Astin A.W. What Matters in College. 1993;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
8. Astin A.W. Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 1996;Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.
9. Bernardin H.J. An Analytic Framework for Customer-Based Performance Content Development and Appraisal. Human Resource Management Review. 2:1992;81-102.
10. Bernardin H.J., Kane, J.S. P. Villanova, and C. Hagan. (in press). "Performance Management and Performance Appraisal: A Customer-Based Orientation." In Performance Appraisal: State of the Arts Methods for Performance Management, edited by J. Smither. Boston, MA, Erlbaum.
11. Beruhe M., Nelson C. Higher Education Under Fire: Politics, Economics and the Crisis of the Humanities. 1995;Routledge, New York.
12. Boyer E.L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1990;Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York.
13. Breneman D.W. Liberal Arts Colleges: Thriving, Surviving, or Endangered. 1994;Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
14. Brown H., Mayhew L.B. American Higher Education. 1965;Center for Applied Research in Education, New York.
15. Callan P.M., Finney J.E. By Design or Default. 1993;California Higher Education Policy Center, San Jose, CA.
16. Cole J.R., Barber E.G., Graubard S.R. The Research University in a Time of Discontent. 1994;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
17. Cousins R.B. Ruminations on Professor Mowday's `Reflections on Editing AMJ'. Journal of Management Inquiry. 3:1994;99-102.
18. Damrosch D. We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. 1995;Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
19. Fairweather J.S., Rhoads R.A. Teaching and the Faculty Role: Enhancing the Commitment to Instruction in American Colleges and Universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 17:(2):1995;179-194.
20. Felder R.M. The Myth of the Superhuman Professor. Journal of Engineering Education. 1994;105-110. April.
21. Feldman K.A. Research Productivity and Scholarly Accomplishment of College Teachers as Related to Their Instructional Effectiveness: A Review and Exploration. Research in Higher Education. 26:1987;227-298.
22. Finn C.E., Manno B.V. Behind the Curtain. The Wilson Quarterly. 1996;44-53. Winter.
23. Finkelstein M.J. The American Academic Profession. 1984;Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
24. Getman J. In the Company of Scholars: The Struggle for the Soul of Higher Education. 1992;University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
25. Gingrich N. To Renew America. 1995;Harper Collins, New York.
26. Gordon J. Don't Let Universities Forget Their Top Priority: Students. The Herald. 1997;1. January 8.
27. Hambrick D.C. 1993 Presidential Address: What if the Academy Actually Mattered? Academy of Management Review. 19:1994;11-16.
28. Hamilton D.P. Research papers: Who's uncited now? Science. 1991;25. January 4.
29. Hitt M. Comment: Academic Research in Management/Organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry. 4:1995;52-56.
30. Honan W.H. Wary of Entrenchment in the Ranks, Colleges Offer Alternatives to Tenure. New York Times. 1994;8. April 20.
31. Jacoby R. Dogmatic Wisdom: How the Culture Wars Divert Education and Distract America. 1994;Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
32. Jencks C., Riesman D. The Academic Revolution. 1968;Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
33. Johnson J.L., Podsakoff P.M. Journal Influence in the Field of Management: Analysis Using Salancik's Index in a Dependency Network. Academy of Management Journal. 37:1994;1392-1407.
34. Kerr C. The Uses of the University. 1995;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Leonhardt D. Tenure: An Idea Whose Time Has Gone. Business Week. 1996;130. October 21.
36. Levine A. Higher Learning in America: 1980-2000. 1993;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
37. Maeroff G.E. College Teachers, The New Leisure Class. The Wall Street Journal. 1995;D9.
38. Mowday R.T. Reflections on Editing AMJ. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2:1993;103-109.
39. Nisbett R. The Permanent Professors. Public Interest. 1:1965;37-50.
40. Nisbett R. The Future of Tenure. Change. 5:1973;27-33.
41. O'Toole J. Tenure: A Conscientious Objection. Change. 10:1978;24-31.
42. Rader L. Chemistry Departments Accommodate State Mandates on Activities, Workloads. Chemical & Engineering News. 74:(7):1996;27.
43. Sax L.J., Astin A.W., Arredondo M., Korn W.S. The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 1995-1996 HERI Faculty Survey. 1996;Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles. University of California, Los Angeles.
44. Schrader B.W., Steiner D.D. Common Comparison Standards: An Approach to Improving Agreement Between Self and Supervisory Performance Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. 81:1996;813-820.
45. Seymour D. Once Upon a Campus. 1995;Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.
46. Silber J. Dialog: The Debate on Tenure. Change. 6:1974;42-45.
47. Smith B.L. The Tenure Debate. 1973;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
48. Smith B.L. Killing the Spirit: Higher Education in America. 1990;Viking, New York.
49. Sykes C. ProfScam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education. 1988;Regency Gateway, Washington, DC.
50. Villa J., Blum A.A. Collective Bargaining in Higher Education: Prospects for Faculty Unions. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector. 25:(2):1996;157-169.
51. Wilke E. The Hidden Professoriate: Credentialism, Professionalism, and the Tenure Crisis. 1979;Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
52. Williams G.G. Some of My Best Friends are Professors: A Critical Commentary on Higher Education. 1958;Abalard-Schuman, New York.
53. Wingspread Group on Higher Education. An Amercian Imperative: Higher Expectations for Higher Education. 1993;The Johnson Foundation, Racine, WI.
54. Wolfe A. The Feudal Culture of the Postmodern University. The Wilson Quarterly. 1996;54-66. Winter, XX.
55. Yuker H.E. Faculty Workload: Research, Theory, and Interpretation. 1984;Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington, DC.
56. Zimbler L. Faculty and Instructional Staff: Who Are They and What Do They Do? 1994;National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.