Simplifying the treatment of edentulism: A new type of implant

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 127, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1343-1349

  Deporter, Douglas A ^a   Watson, Philip A ^a   Booker, Denise ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOY (TIAL6V4);

ARTICLE; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0030237737     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0445     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Reiss-Schmidt T. Trends in dentistry. Implant dentistry in general and specialized practices. Dental Products Report. Northfield, Ill.:Medec Dental Communications;Dec. 1994.
2. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, et al. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1986;65:1064-70.
3. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Chipman ML, Valiquette N. A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants. J Dent Res 1990;69(5):1138-45.
4. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Valiquette N. Dental implant design - effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:467-83.
5. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991;70:1338-45.
6. al-Sayyed A, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implant designs: a radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5(3):131-41.
7. Levy D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. Initial healing in the dog of submerged versus non-submerged porous-coated endosseous dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res (In press).
8. Deporter DA, Watson, PA, Pilliar RM, et al. Partially porous-coated dental implants - 2-year human clinical trial results. J Dent Res 1992;71:256.
9. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, et al. A clinical trial of a partially porous-coated, endosseous dental implant in humans: protocol and 6 month results. In: Laney WR, Tolman DE, eds. Tissue integration in oral, orthopedic and maxillofacial reconstruction. Chicago: Quintessence Books; 1992:250-8.
10. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, et al. A clinical trial in humans of a partially porous-coated endosseous dental implant: three to four year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:83-91.
11. Levy D, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. Periodontal parameters about porous-coated dental implants after three to four years supporting overdentures. J Clin Periodontol (In press).
12. Pilliar RM. Porous-surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21(A1 Supplement):1-33.
13. Pilliar RM. Dental implants: materials and design. J Can Dent Assoc 1990;56:857-61.
14. Adell R, Lekholm U, Branemark P-I. Surgical procedures. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Carol Stream, Ill.: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1985:211-32.
15. Scharf DR, Tarnow DP. The effect of crestal versus mucobuccal incisions on the success rate of implant osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8(2):187-90.
16. Arzouman MJ, Otis L, Kipnis V, Levine D. Observations of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:295-300.
17. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Threaded versus porous-surfaced designs for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model. J Biomed Mater Res 1986:20:1309-33.
18. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Davies JE. Interface zone: factors influencing its structure for cementless implants. In: Movrey BD, ed. Biological material and mechanical considerations of joint replacement. New York: Raven Press; 1993:225.
19. Dziedzic DM, Davies JE. Effects of implant surface topography on osteoconduction. Proceedings of the 20th meeting of the Society of Biomaterials. Boston: Society of Biomaterials; 1994:298.
20. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-6.
21. Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:457-65.
22. Misch CE. Progressive bone loading. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993:623-50.
23. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7(5):25-9.