A federal perspective on special education technology

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 504-511

  Hauser, Jane ^a   Malouf, David B ^a  

^a Office of Special Education Programs   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CHILD; DISABLED PERSON; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; LEGAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; CHILD; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DISABLED PERSONS; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030237040     PISSN: 14690047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002221949602900505     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Clark, R. E. (1985). Confounding in educational computing research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2), 137-148.
2. CLD Research Committee: Rosenberg, M. S., Bott, D., Majsterek, D., Chiang, B., Gartland, D., Wesson, C., Graham, S., Smith-Myles, B., Miller, M., Swanson, H. L., Bender, W., Rivera, D., & Wilson, R. (1993). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 210-213.
3. Division of Innovation and Development, Office of Special Education Programs. (1992a). Administrative aspects of technology implementation in special education: A synthesis of information from eight federally-funded projects. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 752)
4. Division of Innovation and Development, Office of Special Education Programs. (1992b). The technology, educational media and materials strategic program agenda for individuals with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
5. Ellis, E. S., & Sabornie, E. J. (1986). Effective instruction with microcomputers: Promises, practices, and preliminary findings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(4), 1-16.
6. Hanley, T. V. (1993). The future has been a disappointment: A response to Woodward and Noell's article on software development in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(2), 168-176.
7. Hasselbring, T. S. (1991). Improving education through technology: Barriers and recommendations. Preventing School Failure, 35(3), 33-37.
8. Hauser, J. (1991). From computers to virtual reality: A world of change for persons with disabilities. In T. Middleton (Ed.), Virtual worlds: Real challenges. Westport, CT: Meckler.
9. Howell, R. (1991). Working in the 21st Century: New Challenges for Special Education Students. Commissioned paper to the COSMOS Corporation, Washington, DC.
10. Johnston, W., & Packer, A. (1987). Workforce 2000. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
11. Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 19-26.
12. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1(1), 59-74.
13. Malouf, D. B., & Schiller, E. P. (in press). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children.
14. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C. C., Remz, A. R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(5), 45-53.
16. Middleton, T., & Means B. (1991). Exploring technologies for the education of children with disabilities (Final Report, Contract No. HS 89-027001). Washinton, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17. Moore, G. B., Yin, R. K., & Lahm, E. A. (1985) Robotics, artificial intelligence, computer simulation: Future applications in special education (Final Report, Contract No. 300-84-0135). Washington, DC.: Department of Education.
18. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
19. Okolo, C. M., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(1), 1-27.
20. Poplin, M. S. (1988). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401-416.
21. Reich, R. (1991). The wealth of nations. New York: Knopf.
22. Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10-18.
23. Salomon, G., & Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: Lessons from television research. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 13-19.
24. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
25. Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education, Center for Children and Technology.
26. U. S. Department of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
27. Woodward, J. (1992). Workforce 2000 and the mildly handicapped. Commissioned paper to the COSMOS Corporation, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 350 765)