Jumps and logic in the law: What can one expect from logical models of legal argumentation?

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 4, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 297-329

  Peczenik, Aleksander ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Coherence; Defeasibility; Nonmonotonic logic; Principles; Weighing

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FORMAL LOGIC;

ARGUMENTATION; BELIEF REVISION LOGIC; DEFEASIBILITY; LEGAL THEORY; NONMONOTONIC LOGIC; PRIMA FACIE REASONS;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 0030234369     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00118495     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aarnio, Aulis. 1984. Paradigms in Legal Dogmatics. In: A. Peczenik, L. Lindahl and B. van Roermund (edd.), Theory of Legal Science. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel.
2. Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio. 1971. Normative Systems. Wien New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David. 1982. On the Logic of Theory Change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria Vol. XLVIII Part 1.
4. Alchourrón, Carlos; Gärdenfors, Peter and Makinson, David. 1985. On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Functions for Contractions and Revisions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510-530.
5. Alexy, Robert. 1985. Theorie der Grundrechte. Baden-Baden: Nomos (Frankfurt/M. 1986: Suhrkamp).
6. Alexy, Robert. 1985b. Rechtsregeln und Rechtsprinzipien. ARSP Beiheft 25.
7. Alexy, Robert. 1992. Begriff und Geltung des Rechts. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.
8. Alexy, Robert. 1993. Justification and Application of Norms. Ratio Juris Vol. 6 No. 2.
9. Alexy, Robert and Peczenik, Aleksander. 1990. The Concept of Coherence and its Significance for Discursive Rationality. Ratio Juris Vol. 3 No. 1bis.
10. Åqvist, Lennart. 1992. Prima facie Obligations in Deontic Logic: A Chisholmian Analysis Based on Normative Preference Structures. In press in: Proceedings of the Saarbrücken Colloquium PREFERENCES. Saarlouis. June 1992.
11. Bender, John W. (ed.). 1989. The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Critical Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer and Laurence BonJour, with Replies. Dordrecht Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Bergholtz, Gunnar. 1992. Åtal och kontradiktion. Marginalanteckningar till några yngre rättsfall. In: Festskrift till Per Olof Bolding. Stockholm: Juristförlaget.
13. BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
14. Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1989. The Multiple Faces of Knowing: The Hierarchies of Epistemic Species. In: Bender 1989.
15. Chisholm, R. M. 1966. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
16. Chisholm, R. M. 1974. Practical Reason and the Logic of Requirement. In: J. Raz (ed.). Practical Reasoning. Oxford 1978: Oxford University Press.
17. Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
18. Frändberg, Åke. 1973. Om analog användning av rättsnormer. With a Summary in English: On Analogical Use of Legal Norms. Stockholm: Norstedts.
19. Gärdenfors, Peter. 1990. The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 172 (1): 24-46.
20. Goldman, Alvin. 1989. BonJour's Structure of Empirical Knowledge. In: Bender 1989.
21. Goodman, Nelson. 1955. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22. Hage, Jaap C. 1997. Reasoning with Rules. An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Kaufmann, Arthur. 1982. Analogie und "Natur der Sache"; Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Typus. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Decker und Müller.
24. English translation of the first edition by Ilmar Tammelo: "Analogy and the Nature of Things; A Contribution to the Theory of Types". Journal of the Indian Law Institute 8 (1966), 358-401.
25. Koertge, Noretta. 1978: Towards a New Theory of Scientific Inquiry. In: G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (edd.), Progress and Rationality in Science. Dordrecht - London: Reidel.
26. Krygier, Martin. 1991. Thinking Like a Lawyer. In: Wojciech Sadurski (ed.), Ethical Dimensions of Legal Theory. Amsterdam - Atlanta, Ga: Rodopi.
27. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
28. Lehrer, Keith. 1989. Coherence and the Truth Connection: A reply to my critics. In: Bender 1989.
29. Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
30. Nerhot, Patrick (ed.). 1991. Legal Knowledge and Analogy. Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Opalek, Kazimierz and Wolenski, Jan. 1975. Das Problem der Axiomatisierung des Rechts. In: Forschungen aus Staat und Recht, Band 32: Rechtstheorie und Rechtsinformatik. Wien: Springer-Verlag.
32. Pattaro, Enrico. 1988. Models of Reason, Types of Principles and Reasoning. Ratio Juris. Vol. 1 No. 2.
33. Peczenik, Aleksander. 1989. On Law and Reason. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Peczenik, Aleksander. 1995. Vad är rätt? Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
35. Peczenik, Aleksander. 1971. "Analogia legis. Analogy from Statutes in Continental Law". In Le Raisonnement Juridique. Proceedings of the World Congress for Legal and Social Philosophy. Ed. Hubert Hubien. Brussels: Établissements Émile Bruylant: 329-336.
36. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Corrected Edition. Chicago: University Press.
37. Pollock, John L. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
38. Popper, Karl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
39. Popper, Karl R. 1972. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40. Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni. 1995. Argumentation Frameworks: The Missing Link Between Arguments and Procedure. Preliminary Proceedings of the 17th IVR World Congress, Bologna, CLUEB, Vol. 5.
41. Quine. Willard Van Orman. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
42. Rabinowicz, Wlodek and Österberg, Jan. 1996. Value Based on Preferences. On Two Interpretations of Preference Utilitarianism. In: Preference and Value. Preferentialism in Ethics. Lund: Studies in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Lund University.
43. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: University Press.
44. Rolf, Bertil. 1991. Profession, tradition och tyst kunskap. En Studie i Michael Polyanyis teori om den professionella kunskapens tysta dimension. Lund: Nya Doxa.
45. Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Strömberg, Tore. 1988. Rättsordningens byggstenar. Om normtyperna i lag och sedvanerätt. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
47. Sundberg, Jacob. W.F. 1978. Fr. Eddan t. Ekelöf. Repetitorium om rättskällor i Norden. Malmö: Studentlitteratur.
48. Tersman. Folke. 1993. Reflective Equilibrium. An Essay in Moral Epistemology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
49. von Wright, G. H. 1957. Logical Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
50. Zahle, Henrik. 1986. Polycentri i retskildelaere. Festskrift til Torstein Eckhoff. Oslo: Tano.
51. Zahle, Henrik. 1992. Findes det kun én bevisret? Festskrift till Per Olof Bolding. Stockholm: Juristförlaget.