Experimental robot identification using optimised periodic trajectories

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 561-577

  Swevers, J ^a   Ganseman, C ^a   De Schutter, J ^a   Van Brussel, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; MANIPULATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOTION CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

KUKA IR/361 INDUSTRIAL ROBOT; OPTIMIZED PERIODIC TRAJECTORIES; PARAMETERIZATION APPROACH;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 0030232035     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1996.0039     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. B. ARMSTRONG 1989 The International Journal of Robotics Research 8, 28-48. On finding excitation trajectories for identification experiments involving systems with nonlinear dynamics.
2. P. FISETTE, B. RAUCENT and J. C. SAMIN 1993 Computer aided analysis of rigid and flexible mechanical systems, Nato-Advanced Study Institute, Vol. II, 111-129. Minimal dynamic characterization of tree-like multibody systems.
3. E. FREUND 1982 International Journal of Robotics Research, 1, 68-78. Fast nonlinear control with arbitrary pole-placement for industrial robots and manipulators.
4. M. GAUTIER, C. JANIN and C. PRESSE 1993 Proceedings of the Second European Control Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2291-2296. Dynamic identification of robots using least squares and extended kalman filtering methods.
5. G. H. GOLUB and C. F. VAN LOAN 1989 Matrix Computation 2nd edn. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. A. GRACE 1992 Optimisation Toolbox for Use with Matlab. MA, U.S.A.: The Math Works, Inc.
7. C. L. LAWSON and R. J. HANSON 1974 Solving Least Squares Problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. L. LJUNG 1987 System Identification, Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. B. MARKIEWICZ 1973 Analysis of computed torque drive method and comparison with conventional position servo for a computer controlled manipulator. JPL, Caltech, TM 33-601.
10. H. MAYEDA, K. YOSHIDA and K. OSUKA June 1990 IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 312-321. Base parameters of manipulator dynamic models.
11. K. OTANI and T. KAKIZAKI 1993 Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Tokyo, Japan, 743-748. Motion planning and modeling for accurately identifying dynamic parameters of an industrial robotic manipulator.
12. M. RENAUD 1987 Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1677-1682. Quasi-minimal computation of the dynamic model of a robot manipulator utilizing the Newton-Euler formalism and the notion of augmented body.
13. J. SCHOUKENS and R. PINTELON 1991. Identification of Linear Systems. A Practical Guideline to Accurate Modeling, London: Pergamon Press.
14. R. PINTELON and J. SCHOUKENS 1990 IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 39 (6) 923-927. Real-time integration and differentiation of analog signals by means of digital filtering.
15. M. SPONG and M. VIDYASAGAR 1989 Robot Dynamics and Control. New York: John Wiley.
16. D. TORFS and J. DE SCHUTTER 1992 Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Barcelona, Spain, 314-319. A new control scheme for a flexible robot driven by a velocity controlled actuator.
17. P. VAN DE POEL, W. WITVROUW, H. BRUYNINCKX and J. DE SCHUTTER 1993 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Tokyo, Japan, 713-718. An environment for developing and optimising compliant robot motion tools.