|
|
Volumn 7, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 743-750
|
|
Intraductal biliary biopsy: Comparison of three techniques
|
|
Author keywords
Bile ducts, biopsy, 768.1261; Bile ducts, neoplasms, 768.321, 77.33; Biopsies, technology, 768.1261; Pancreas, neoplasms, 77.33
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILE DUCT CARCINOMA;
BILE DUCT TUMOR;
BIOPSY;
CARCINOMA;
CATHETERIZATION;
CHILD;
CHOLESTASIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CYTODIAGNOSIS;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
FLUOROSCOPY;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY;
INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PANCREAS TUMOR;
PATHOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
WOUND DRAINAGE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS;
BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC;
BIOPSY;
CARCINOMA;
CATHETERIZATION;
CHILD;
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
CHOLESTASIS;
CYTODIAGNOSIS;
DRAINAGE;
FEMALE;
FLUOROSCOPY;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
|
EID: 0030228394
PISSN: 10510443
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)70843-6 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (45)
|
|
References (2)
|
