Cochlear implant place psychophysics: 2. Electrocochleographic changes of the compound action potential after CSF aspiration:An experimental study

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 265-277

  Cohen, Lawrence T ^a   Busby, Peter A ^a   Whitford, Lesley A ^a   Clark, Graeme M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bipolar; Cochlear implant; Forward masking; Monopolar; Pitch; Stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SCALA TYMPANI;

EID: 0030224822     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000259210     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Colien LT, Clark GM, Whitford LA: Forward masking patterns and pitch estimation for bipolar and remote ground stimulation in a subject implanted with a Cochlear Pty. Limited ‘20 + 2’ cochlear implant. J AcoustSocAm 1993:93:2333.
2. Busby PA, Whitford LA, Blarney PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM: Pilch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust SocAm 1994:95:2658-2669.
3. Dorman MF, Smith L, McCandlcss G, Dunnavant G, Parkin J, Dan-kowski K: Pitch scaling and speech understanding by patients who use the Incraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990:11:310-315.
4. Eddington DK: Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1980:68: 885-891.
5. Shannon RV: Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 1983:11:157-189.
6. Tong YC. Clark GM: Absolute identification of electric pulse rales and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1985:77:1881-1888.
7. Tong YC, Black RC. Clark GM. Forster IC. Millar JB. O’Loughlin BJ, Patrick JF: A preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. J Larvngcl Otol 1979:93:679-695.
8. Tong YC. Clark GM, Blarney PJ, Busby PA, Dowell RC: Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J AcoustSocAm 1982;71:153-160.
9. Townshend B. Cotter N, Van Com-pcrnollc D, White RL: Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J AcoustSocAm 1987;82:106-115.
10. McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Van-dali AE: A new portable sound processor for the University of Mel-bourne/Nucleus Limited multielcc-trodc cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1992:91:3367-3371.
11. Skinner MW. Holden LK. Holden TA, Dowell RC. Seligman PM, Bri-macombc JA. Beiter AL: Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults w ith the wearable speech processor (WSP III) and mini speech processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1991:12:3-22.
12. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabi-nowitz WM: New levels of speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991:352:236-238.
13. Cohen LT, Busby PA, Clark GM: Cochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. Audio! Ncurootol 1996:1:278-292.
14. von Bckcsy G: Experiments in Hearing. New York. McGraw-Hill. 1960.
15. Greenwood DD: Critical bandw idth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961:33:1344-1356.
16. Greenwood DD: A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990:87:2592-2605.
17. Blarney PJ. Pyman BC. Gordon M. Clark GM. Brown AM. Dowell RC. Hollow RD: Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlin-gually deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:342-348.
18. Lehnhardt E: Intracochleär electrode placement facilitated by Hea-lon. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1993:48: 62-64.
19. Cohen LT, Xu J, Xu SA, Clark GM: Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am J Otol. in press.
20. Marsh MA, Xu J, Blarney PJ, Whit-ford LA, Xu SA, Silverman JM, Clark GM: Radiological evaluation of multiple-channel intracochleär implant insertion depth. Am J Otol 1993:14:386-391.
21. Clark GM. Pyman BC. Webb RL, Bailey QE, Shepherd RK: Surgery for an improved multiple-channel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984:93:204-207.
22. Clark GM, Blarney PJ. Busby PA, Dowell RC, Franz BK, Musgrave GN, Nienhuys TG, Pyman BC. Roberts SA, Tong YC, Webb RL. Kuzma JA. Money DK. Patrick JF, Se-ligman PM: A multiple-electrode intracochleär implant for children. Arch Otolaryngol 1987; 113:825-828.
23. von Wallenberg EL, Laszig R. Gnadeberg D. Battmer RD, Des-loovere C. Lchnhardt E, von Ilberg C: Initial findings with a modified Nucleus implant comprised of 20 active intracochleär and 2 extra-cochlear reference electrodes; in Hochmair-Desoyer 1J, Hochmair ES (eds): Advances in Cochlear Implants. Wien. Mainz. 1994, pp 186-192.
24. Black RC. Clark GM: DilTcrential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 1980:67: 868-874.
25. Merzenich MM. White MW: Cochlear implant: The interface problem: in I lambrccht FT, Reswick JB (eds): Functional Electrical Stimulation. New York. Dekker, 1977. pp 321-340.
26. Van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH: Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory' nerve. Hear Res 1987;29:195-206.
27. Finley CC: Models of potential distributions for various types and placements of electrodes. Conf Implantable Aud Prosthcses. Pacific Grove. June 1991.
28. Leake PA. Snyder RL. Rebscher SJ: Electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Factors affecting spatial selectivity. Abstr 16th Annu Midwinter Res Meet Assoc Res Otolaryngol, St Petersburg Beach, 1993.
29. McCandless PT, Li L, Parkins CW: Electrical field propagation measured as single neuron thresholds and scala tympani voltages in the squirrel monkey. Abstr 15th Annu Midwinter Res Meet, Assoc Res Otolaryngol. St Petersburg Beach. 1992.
30. Bredberg G: Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1968:236:1-135.
31. Burn DA. Ryan TA Jr.: A diagnostic test for lack of fit in regression models. ASA Proc Stat Comput Sect 1983:286-290.
32. Boothroyd A. Hanin L. Hnath T: A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability. Set Equivalence and Short Term Learning. Int Rep RCI 10. New York. City University of New York, 1985.
33. Ariyasu L, Galcv FR, Hilsinger R, Frederick MB: Computer-generated three-dimensional reconstruction of the cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989:100:87-91.
34. Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Pyman BC, Webb RL: Banded intracochleär electrode array: Evaluation of insertion trauma in human temporal bones. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985:94:55-59.
35. Blarney PJ. Parisi ES. Clark GM: Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli: in Clark GM, Cowan RSC (eds): International Cochlear Implant, Speech and Hearing Symposium-Melbourne. 1994. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104(suppl 166):220-222.
36. Stevens SS, Volkmann J: The relation of pitch to frequency: A revised scale. Am J Psychol 1940:53:329-353.
37. Stevens SS. Galanter EH: Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. J Exp Psychol 1957:54:377-411.