|
|
|
Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 481-521
|
|
The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALGESIC AGENT;
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ETHICS;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUILL V. VACCO;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
QUILL V. VACCO;
ANALGESICS;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
|
|
EID: 0030223750
PISSN: 00933058
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (11)
|
|
References (0)
|
