|
|
|
Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 22-24
|
|
A comparison of two cavity liners versus dentin adhesive in the prevention of coronal microleakage.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ALL BOND SYSTEM;
ALL-BOND SYSTEM;
CALCIUM PHOSPHATE;
DENTIN BONDING AGENT;
DRUG DERIVATIVE;
GUTTA PERCHA;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE;
RESIN;
ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL;
ROTH'S 801 SEALER;
THYMOL;
TUBULITEC;
ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL SURGERY;
DRUG COMBINATION;
DRUG SCREENING;
ENDODONTICS;
HUMAN;
IN VITRO STUDY;
TOOTH CROWN;
TOOTH DISEASE;
CALCIUM PHOSPHATES;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL CAVITY LINING;
DENTAL LEAKAGE;
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS;
DRUG COMBINATIONS;
DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL;
GUTTA-PERCHA;
HUMANS;
METHACRYLATES;
POLYSTYRENES;
ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS;
ROOT CANAL OBTURATION;
THYMOL;
TOOTH CROWN;
ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;
|
|
EID: 0030223145
PISSN: 10620311
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
