|
Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 270-299
|
Assisted suicide and refusing medical treatment: linguistics, morals and legal contortions.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
BEHAVIOR;
CANADA;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MOTIVATION;
NEW ZEALAND;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
CANADA;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INTENTION;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
INTERNATIONALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MOTIVATION;
NEW ZEALAND;
PHYSICIANS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0030223050
PISSN: 09670742
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/4.3.270 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (0)
|