Cell surface organization by the membrane skeleton

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 566-574

  Kusumi, Akihiro ^a   Sako, Yasushi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SURFACE; CYTOSKELETON; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PLASMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW;

EID: 0030222116     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80036-6     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. 1. Grasberger B, Minton AP, DeLisi C, Metzger H: Interaction between proteins localized in membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986, 83:6258-6262.
2. 2. Metzger H: Transmembrane signaling: the joy of aggregation. J Immunol 1992, 149:1477-1487.
3. 3. Gadella TWJ, Jovin TM: Oligomerization of epidermal growth factor receptors on A431 cells studied by time-resolved fluorescence imaging microscopy. A stereochemical model for tyrosine kinase receptor activation. J Cell Biol 1995, 129:1543-1558. The aggregation states of the epidermal growth factor receptor on A431 cells were assessed using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer technique. The results suggest that the receptors of the high-affinity, functional subclass on quiescent A431 cells are present in a predimerized or oligomerized state.
4. 4. Heldin C-H: Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction. Cell 1995, 80:213-223. An extensive review of ligand-induced receptor activation through dimerization and oligomerization of the receptor molecules. Emphasis is placed on growth factor receptors.
5. 5. Klymkowski MW, Parr B: The body language of cells: the intimate connection between cell adhesion and behavior. Cell 1995, 83:5-8. A succinct and good review of how cell-cell contact leads to formation of the adherens junction. It covers both structural and informational aspects of the assembly of adherens junctions.
6. 6. Miyamoto S, Akiyama SK, Yamada KM: Synergistic roles for receptor occupancy and aggregation in integrin transmembrane function. Science 1995, 267:883-885. The effects of binding of large (12 mm-φ) latex beads, coated with either various antibodies or ligands for integrin, to the human foreskin fibroblast cell surface were studied to examine the roles of ligand occupancy and aggregation of integrins. Tensin and focal adhesion kinase were accumulated at the beads that caused integrin aggregation, and tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins was induced. Receptor occupancy by the ligands was not needed for these processes. However, accumulation of F-actin, vinculin, talin, α-actinin, paxillin and filamin required both aggregation and occupancy of integrins (ligand-coated beads, or non-inhibitory antibodies on beads plus soluble ligands, produced these effects).
7. 7. Miyamoto S, Teramoto H, Coso OA, Gutkind JS, Burbelo PD, Akiyama SK, Yamada KM: Integrin function: molecular hierarchies of cytoskeletal and signaling molecules. J Cell Biol 1995, 131:791-805.
8. 8. Nelson WJ: Regulation of surface polarity from bacteria to mammals. Science 1992, 258:948-955.
9. 9. Kuo S, Sheetz MP: Optical tweezers in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol 1992, 2:116-118.
10. 10. Svoboda K, Block SM: Biological applications of optical forces. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1994, 23:247-285.
11. 11. Sheets ED, Simson R, Jacobson K: New insights into membrane dynamics from the analysis of cell surface interactions by physical methods. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995, 7:707-714. Excellent review on the translational diffusion of proteins and on molecular interactions in the plasma membrane, as analyzed by microscopy-based physical methods. Includes an interesting discussion of the structural origins of various modes of protein motion.
12. 12. Bennett V: Spectrin-based membrane skeleton: a multipotential adaptor between plasma membrane and cytoplasm. Physiol Rev 1990, 70:1029-1065.
13. 13. Bennett V, Gilligan DM: The spectrin-based membrane skeleton and micron-scale organization of the plasma membrane. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1993, 9:27-66.
14. 14 Luna EJ, Hitt AL: Cytoskeleton-plasma membrane interactions. Science 1992, 258:955-964.
15. 15 Edidin M: Patches, posts and fences: proteins and plasma membrane domains. Trends Cell Biol 1992, 2:376-380.
16. 16. Edidin M: Patches and fences: probing for plasma membrane domains. J Cell Sci 1993, 17(suppl):165-169.
17. 17. Hitt AL, Luna EJ: Membrane interactions with the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1994, 6:120-130.
18. 18. Jacobson K, Sheets ED, Simson R: Revisiting the fluid mosaic model of membranes. Science 1995, 268:1441-1442. An excellent and succinct review of our present understanding of protein dynamics in the plasma membrane.
19. 19. Petersen NO, Höddelius PL, Wiseman PW, Seger O, Magnusson K-E: Quantitaten of membrane receptor distributions by image correlation spectroscopy: concept and applications. Biophys J 1993, 65:1135-1146.
20. 20. Parton RG, Simons K: Digging into caveolae. Science 1995, 269:1398-1399. A brief review on the structure, and mechanism of formation, of caveolae. Presents a very interesting discussion of detergent-insoluble glycosphingolipid-enriched (DIG) domains and caveolae. This review clearly indicates that future studies should benefit greatly from a concerted effort of the protein and lipid research camps, which have been working separately.
21. 21. Gelles J, Schnapp BJ, Sheetz MP: Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision. Nature 1988, 331:450-453.
22. 22. Geerts H, De Brabander M, Nuydens R: Nanovid microscopy. Nature 1991, 351:765-766.
23. 23. Anderson CM, Georgiou GN, Morrison IEG, Stevenson GVW, Cherry RJ: Tracking of cell surface receptors by fluorescence digital imaging microscopy using a charge-coupled device camera. Low-density lipoprotein and influenza virus receptor mobility at 4°C. J Cell Sci 1992, 101:415-425.
24. 24. Cherry RJ: Keeping track of cell surface receptors. Trends Cell Biol 1992, 2:242-244.
25. 25. Ghosh RN, Webb WW: Automated detection and tracking of individual and clustered cell surface low density lipoprotein receptor molecules. Biophys J 1994, 66:1301-1318.
26. 26. Wang Y-L, Silverman JD, Cao L-G: Single particle tracking of surface receptor movement during cell division. J Cell Biol 1994, 127:963-971.
27. 27. Qian H, Sheetz MP, Elson E: Single particle tracking (analysis of diffusion and flow in two-dimensional systems). Biophys J 1991, 60:910-921.
28. 28. Saxton MJ: Lateral diffusion in an archipelago. Single-particle diffusion. Biophys J 1993, 64:1766-1780.
29. 29. Saxton MJ: Anomalous diffusion due to obstacles: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J 1994, 66:683-688.
30. 30. Saxton MJ: Single-particle tracking: effects of corrals. Biophys J 1995, 69:389-398. Monte Carlo simulation of lateral diffusion of membrane proteins in corrals was carried out to develop a method to interpret the trajectories obtained by single-particle tracking. Escape times for a diffusing particle in a corral were obtained, and the possibility of the identification of corrals in tracking experiments was carefully examined.
31. 31. Saxton MJ: Single-particle tracking: new methods of data analysis. Biophys J 1996, 70:A334.
32. 32. Kusumi A, Sako Y, Yamamoto M: Confined lateral diffusion of membrane receptors as studied by single particle tracking (nanovid microscopy). Effects of calcium-induced differentiation in cultured epithelial cells. Biophys J 1993 65:2021-2040.
33. 33. Tomishige M: Analysis of the membrane skeleton network of human erythrocytes by single particle tracking and manipulation: elastic deformability of the cell and regulation of the movements of membrane proteins [MSc thesis]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo; 1995.
34. 34. Sheetz MP, Turney S, Qian H, Elson EL: Nanometre-level analysis demonstrates that lipid flow does not drive membrane glycoprotein movements. Nature 1989, 340:284-288.
35. 35. Simson R, Sheets ED, Jacobson K: Detection of temporary lateral confinement of membrane proteins using single particle tracking analysis. Biophys J 1995, 69:989-993. When studying single-particle trajectories, it would be very useful if the portion of trajectory in which the particle is undergoing confined diffusion could be distinguished. The presence of such a portion indicates temporary confinement of the protein. The authors of this paper developed a protocol to distinguish such a portion. Analysis of the movements of Thy-1 and NCAM125 by this method revealed that ∼30% of the trajectories for both proteins exhibited periods of transient confinement that lasted for 8 seconds on average, in regions that were about 280 nm in diameter.
36. 36. Tsuji A, Ohnishi S: Restriction of the lateral motion of band 3 in the erythrocyte membrane by the cytoskeletal network: dependence on spectrin association state. Biochemistry 1986, 25:6133-6139.
37. 37. Tsuji A, Kawasaki K, Ohnishi S, Merkle H, Kusumi A: Regulation of band 3 mobilities in erythrocyte ghost membranes by protein association and cytoskeletal meshwork. Biochemistry 1988, 27:7447-7452.
38. 38. Corbett JD, Agre P, Palek J, Golan DE: Differential control of band 3 lateral and rotational mobility in intact red cells. J Clin Invest 1994, 94:683-688.
39. 39. Sako Y, Kusumi A: Compartmentalized structure of the plasma membrane for lateral diffusion of receptors as revealed by nanometer-level motion analysis. J Cell Biol 1994, 125:1251-1264.
40. 40. De Brabander M, Nuydens R, Ishihara A, Holifield B, Jacobson K, Geerts H: Lateral diffusion and retrograde movements of individual cell surface components on single motile cells observed with nanovid microscopy. J Cell Biol 1991, 112:111-124.
41. 41. Yechiel E, Edidin M: Micrometer-scale domains in fibroblast plasma membranes. J Cell Biol 1987, 105:755-760.
42. 42. Edidin M, Stroynowski I: Differences between the lateral organization of conventional and inositol phospholipid-anchored membrane proteins. A further definition of micrometer scale domains. J Cell Biol 1991, 112:1143-1150.
43. 43. Ashkin A, Dziedzic JM, Bjorkholm JE, Chu S: Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt Letters 1986, 11:288-290.
44. 44. Ashkin A., Schütze K, Dziedzic JM, Euteneuer U, Schliwa M: Force generation of organelle transport measured in vivo by an infrared laser trap. Nature 1990, 348:346-347.
45. 45. Kucik DF, Kuo SC, Elson EL, Sheetz MP: Preferential attachment of membrane glycoproteins to the cytoskeleton at the leading edge of lamella. J Cell Biol 1991, 114:1029-1036.
46. 46. Schmidt CE, Horwitz AF, Lauffenburer DA, Sheetz MP: Integrin cytoskeletal interactions in migrating fibroblasts are dynamic, asymmetric, and regulated. J Cell Biol 1993, 123:977-991.
47. 47. Ashkin A, Dziedzic JM, Yamane T: Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared-laser beams. Nature 1987, 330:769-771.
48. 48. Edidin M, Kuo SC, Sheetz MP: Lateral movements of membrane glycoproteins restricted by dynamic cytoplasmic barriers. Science 1991, 254:1379-1382.
49. 49. Edidin M, Zún̄iga MC, Sheetz MP: Truncation mutants define and locate cytoplasmic barriers to lateral mobility of membrane glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:3378-3382.
50. 50. Sako Y, Kusumi A: Barriers for lateral diffusion of transferrin receptor in the plasma nembrane as characterized by receptor dragging by laser tweezers: fence versus tether. J Cell Biol 1995, 129:1559-1574. Transferrin receptors were labelled with either 40 nm colloidal gold particles or 210nm latex particles and were dragged by laser tweezers along the plasma membrane. For 90% of the receptors, which were undergoing rapid confined diffusion, the distance dragged was consistent with the size of the membrane compartments observed by SPT [39] at a trapping force of 0.05-0.1 pN. The force needed to get over the barriers at the compartment boundaries was 0.1 pN (half of the molecules pass the fences with this force). The remaining 10% of the receptors could not be dragged and were likely to be tethered to the cytoskeleton. The rebound motion of particles after escape from the optical trap suggested that both barriers and tethers were elastic, with an elastic constant between 1-10 pN/μm.
51. 51. Sheetz MP, Schindler M, Koppel DE: Lateral mobility of integral membrane proteins is increased in spherocytic erythrocytes. Nature 1980, 285:510-512.
52. -1.4, where S is proportional to the sum of the protein and cytoskeleton chain radii.
53. 53. Discher DE, Mohandas N, Evans EA: Molecular maps of red cell deformation: hidden elasticity and in situ connectivity. Science 1994, 266:1032-1035.
54. 54. Hikichi Y: A study on the regulation mechanism of protein movements on the cell surface by single particle tracking and laser tweezers: comparison of T-cadherin, N-cadherin, and transferrin receptor [PhD thesis]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo, 1995.
55. 55. Dai J, Sheetz MP: Mechanical properties of neuronal growth cone membranes studied by tether formation with laser optical tweezers. Biophys J 1995, 68:988-996.
56. 56. Sheetz MP: Glycoprotein motility and dynamic domains in fluid plasma membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1993, 22:417-431.
57. 57. Saxton MJ: Lateral diffusion in an archipelago (effects of impermeable patches on diffusion in a cell membrane). Biophys J 1982, 39:165-173.
58. 58. Saxton MJ: Lateral diffusion in an archipelago (the effect of mobile obstacles). Biophys J 1987, 52:989-997.
59. 59. Saxton MJ: Lateral diffusion in an archipelago. Distance dependence of the diffusion coefficient. Biophys J 1989, 56:615-622.
60. 60. Ashikawa I, Yin J-J, Subczynski WK, Kouyama T, Hyde JS, Kusumi A: Molecular organization and dynamics in bacteriorhodopsin-rich reconstituted membranes: discrimination of lipid environments by the oxygen transport parameter using a pulse ESR spin-labeling technique. Biochemistry 1994, 33:4947-4952.
61. 61. Zhang F, Crise B, Su B, Hou Y, Rose JK, Bothwell A, Jacobson K: Lateral diffusion of membrane-spanning and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins: toward establishing rules governing the lateral mobility of membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 1991, 115:75-84.
62. 62. Zhang F, Crise B, Su B, Hou Y, Rose JK, Bothwell A, Jacobson K: The lateral mobility of some membrane proteins is determined by their ectodomains. Biophys J 1992, 62:92-94.
63. 63. Lee GM, Zhang F, Ishihara A, McNeil CL, Jacobson K: Unconfined lateral diffusion and an estimate of pericellular matrix viscosity revealed by measuring the mobility of gold-tagged lipids. J Cell Biol 1993, 120:25-35.
64. 64. Saxton MJ: The membrane skeleton of erythrocytes (a percolation model). Biophys J 1990, 57:1167-1177.
65. 65. Webb WW: Fractile time transport in the cell surface [abstract]. Biophys J 1994, 66:18.
66. 66. Parton RG, Joggerst B, Simons K: Regulated internalization of caveolae. J Cell Biol 1994, 127:1199-1215.
67. 67. Van Meer G: Transport and sorting of membrane lipids. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1993, 5:661-667.
68. M1 is enriched in caveolae, whereas GPI-anchored proteins are located adjacent to caveolae on the flat plasma membrane. The purified caveolae contained molecular components required for regulated transport, including various lipid-anchored signaling molecules.
69. 69. Murata M, Perämen J, Schreiner R, Wieland F, Kurzchalia TV, Simons K: VIP21/caveolin is a cholesterol-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:10339-10343. VIP21/caveolin was the first protein to be localized in caveolae. In this work, E. coli-expressed VIP21-caveolin was reconstituted in liposomes. The protein reconstituted only with cholesterol-containing lipid mixtures, and formed oligomers. The protein binds at least one mole of cholesterol per mole of protein. These results suggest that VIP21-caveolin, through its cholesterol-binding and self-associating properties, serves a specific function in the formation of sphingolipid-cholesterol rafts during membrane trafficking.
70. 70. McNeill H, Ryan TA, Smith SJ, Nelson WJ: Spatial and temporal dissection of immediate and early events following cadherin-mediated epithelial cell adhesion. J Cell Biol 1993, 120:1217-1226.
71. 71. Dai J, Sheetz MP: Axon membrane flows from the growth cone to the cell body. Cell 1995, 83:693-701. Using latex particles non-specifically attached to the chick dorsal root ganglion cell surface, the authors found a fast flow of axonal membrane (over 7 μm/min) from the growth cone to the cell body during axonal growth. This flow is powered by a gradient of membrane tension in the same direction. When beads at the center of the axon were pulled perpendicularly to the membrane by an optical trap, a process which induced an artificial membrane flow toward the center of the axon, 80% of the membrane came from the growth cone side. The authors suggest that, during neuron growth, excess membrane is added at the growth cone, which creates a flow that can rapidly alter the content of the axon membrane.
72. M1 in the monolayer.
73. 73. Muramatsu H, Chiba N, Homma K, Nakajima K, Ataka T, Ohta S, Kusumi A, Fujihira M: Near-field optical microscopy in liquids. Appl Phys Lett 1995, 66:3245-3247. The first report on the development of the scanning near-field optical microscope which can be applied to samples in liquids including water. The tip-sample separation was controlled by the method of the non-contact dynamic mode atomic force microscope. The first observation of cultured cells in aqueous solution was made.
74. 3pN. A microscopic bead is biochemically attached to the transducer as a surface probe. This apparatus was applied to measure local mechanical compliance of the BHK (baby hamster kidney) cell surface at a displacement resolution set by structural fluctuations.
75. 75. Ghislain LP, Webb WW: Scanning-force microscope based on an optical trap. Opt Letters 1993, 18:1678-1680.
76. 76. Florin E-L, Hörber JKH, Stelzer EHK: 3-D scanning probe microscope based on optical tweezers and 2-photon excitation by a cw-Nd:YAG laser [abstract]. Biophys J 1996, 70:431.