Different mechanisms may underlie the performance in relative localization tasks

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 16, 1996, Pages 2531-2535

  Bocheva, N ^a   Yakimoff, N ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Method of adjustment; Relative localization; Spatial vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0030220143     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00310-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Burbeck C.A. Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgements. Vision Research. 27:1987;417-428.
2. Burbeck C.A., Yap Y.L. Two mechanisms for localization? Evidence for separation-dependent and separation-independent processing of position information. Vision Research. 30:1990;739-750.
3. Hess R.F., Holliday I.E. The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and contrast. Vision Research. 32:1992;1085-1097.
4. Horn, B. K. P., (1986). Robot vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Jiang B.-C., Levi D.M. Spatial-interval discrimination in two-dimensions. Vision Research. 31:1991;1931-1937.
6. Klein, S. A. & Levi , D. M. (1987). Position sense of the peripheral retina. Journal of the Optical Society of America A4, 1543-1553.
7. Levi D.M., Klein S.A. Weber's law for position: The role of spatial frequency and contrast. Vision Research. 32:1992;2235-2250.
8. Lotze, H. (1885). Micrcosmos. Translated by Hamilton E. & Constance Jones, E. E. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
9. Meer P., Zeevi Y.Y. The role of stimulus structure in spatial hyperacuity. Spatial Vision. 4:1989;141-164.
10. Morgan, M. J. (1991). Hyperacuity. In Regan, D. M. (Ed.), Spatial vision, pp. 151-11.
11. Morgan M.J., Glennerster A. Efficiency of locating centres of dot-clusters by human observers. Vision Research. 31:1991;2075-2083.
12. Morgan M.J., Hole G.J., Glennerster A. Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vision Research. 30:1990;1793-1990.
13. Morgan M.J., Regan D. Opponent model for line interval discrimination: Interval and vernier performance compared. Vision Research. 27:1987;107-118.
14. Toet A., Smith C.S., Nienhuis B., Koenderink J.J. The visual assessment of the spatial location of a bright bar. Vision Research. 28:1988;721-737.
15. Vos P.G., Bocheva N., Yakimoff N., Helsper E. Absolute localization of two-dimensional patterns. Vision Research. 33:1993;2157-2169.
16. Ward R.M., Casco C., Watt R.J. The location of noisy visual stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 39:1985;387-399.
17. Whitaker D., MacVeigh D. Sequential mapping of weighting functions for visual location. Spatial Vision. 6:1992;117-131.
18. Whitaker D., Walker H. Centroid evaluation in the vernier alignment of random dot clusters. Vision Research. 28:1988;777-784.
19. Wilson, H. R. (1991). Pattern discrimination, visual filters, and spatial uncertainty. In Landy, M. & Movshon, J. A. (Eds), Computational models of visual processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Yakimoff N., Bocheva N., Mitrani L. Perceiving the centre of irregular contour quadrangles. Spatial Vision. 5:1990;51-57.