Building an organization-specific infrastructure to support CASE tools

Automated Software Engineering

Volumn 3, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 239-259

  Henninger, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

CASE adoption; Domain analysis; Domain lifecycle; Groupware; Methodology; Organizational learning; Reuse

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PRODUCTIVITY;

DOMAIN LIFECYCLE; GROUPWARE; ORGANIZATION SPECIFIC INFRASTRUCTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0030219145     PISSN: 09288910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00132568     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ackerman, M.S. and Malone, T.W. 1990. Answer garden: A tool for growing organizational memory. In Proceedings of the Conference on Office Information Systems, pp. 31-39.
2. Arango, G. 1989. Domain analysis: From art form to engineering discipline. In Proceedings Fifth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 152-159.
3. Arango, G., Schoen, E., and Pettengill, R. 1993. A process for consolidating and reusing design knowledge. 15th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'93), Baltimore, MD, pp. 231-242.
4. Belkin, N.J. and Croft, W.B. 1992. Information filtering and information retrieval: Two sides of the same coin?. Communications of the ACM, 35(12):29-38.
5. Berlin, L.M., Jeffries, R., O'day, V.L., Paepcke, A., and Wharton, C. 1993. Where did you put it? Issues in the design and use of a group memory. In Proc. InterCHI'93, Amsterdam, pp. 23-30.
6. Biggerstaff, T.J. 1992. An assessment and analysis of software reuse. Advances in Computers, 34:1-57.
7. Boehm, B.W. 1988. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 21(5):61-72.
8. Caldiera, G. and Basili, V.R. 1991. Identifying and qualifying reusable software components. Computer, 24(2):61-70.
9. Card, D.N., McGarry, F.E., and Page, G.T. 1987. Evaluating software engineering technologies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(7):845-851.
10. Church, T. and Matthews, P. 1995. An evaluation of object-oriented CASE tools: The newbridge experience. IEEE Seventh International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering - CASE'95, pp. 4-9.
11. Computer Science and Technology Board. 1990. Scaling up: A research agenda for software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 33(3):281-293.
12. Conklin, E.J. and Yakemovic, K. 1991. A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3-4):357-391.
13. Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. 1988. A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, 31(11):1268-1287.
14. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Fumas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., and Harshman, R. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391-407.
15. Domeshek, E.A. and Kolodner, J.L. 1992. A case-based design aid for architecture. Artificial Intelligence in Design'92, pp. 497-516.
16. Fischer, G. and Lemke, A.C. 1988. Construction kits and design environments: Steps toward human problem-domain communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 3(3):179-222.
17. Fischer, G., Lemke, A.C., Mastaglio, T., and Morch, A.I. 1991a. Critics: An emerging approach to knowledge-based human computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35(5):695-721.
18. Fischer, G., Lemke, A.C., McCall, R., and Morch, A. 1991b. Making argumentation serve design. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3-4):393-419.
19. Fischer, G., Girgensohn, A., Nakakoji, K., and Redmiles, D. 1992. Supporting software designers with integrated, domain-oriented design environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Special Issue on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Software Engineering, 18(6):511-522.
20. Fischer, G., McCall, R., Ostwald, J., Reeves, B., and Shipman, F. 1994. Seeding evolutionary growth and reseeding: Supporting the incremental development of design environments. In Proc. of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI'94), Boston, MA, pp. 292-298.
21. Fouque, G. and Matwin, S. 1993. A case-based approach to software reuse. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1:165-197.
22. Gaines, B. 1989. Social and cognitive processes in knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition, 1(1):38-58.
23. Gomaa, H. and Kerschberg, L. 1995. Domain modeling for software reuse and evolution. IEEE Seventh International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering - CASE'95, pp. 162-171.
24. Granger, M. and Pick, R. 1991. Computer-aided software engineering impact on the software development process: An experiment. In Proc. 24th Annual International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 28-35.
25. Griss, M.L. 1993. Software reuse: From library to factory. IBM Systems Journal, 32(4):548-565.
26. Henninger, S. 1994. Using iterative refinement to find reusable software. IEEE Software, 11(5).
27. Henninger, S. 1995. Information access tools for software reuse. Journal of Systems and Software, 30(3):231-247.
28. Henninger, S. and Lappala, K. 1994. Finding the Right for the Job, UNL-CSE-94-002, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Lincoln, NE.
29. Henninger, S., Lappala, K., and Raghavendran, A. 1995. An organizational learning approach to domain analysis. Seventeenth International Conference on Software Engineering, Seattle, WA, pp. 95-104.
30. Holtzblatt, K. and Jones, S. 1993. Contextual inquiry: A participatory technique for system design. Participatory Design: Principles and Practice, A. Namioka and D. Schuler (Eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
31. Huff, C.C. 1992. Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget. Communications of the ACM, 35(4): 45-54.
32. Humphrey, W.S. 1989. Managing the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
33. Kemerer, C.F. 1992. How the learning curve affects CASE tool adoption. IEEE Software, 9(3):23-28.
34. Kolodner, J.L. 1991. Improving human decision making through case-based decision aiding. AI Magazine, 12(1): 52-68.
35. Kolodner, J.L. 1993. Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufman.
36. Lee, J. 1990. SIBYL: A tool for managing group design rationale. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'90), Los Angeles, CA, pp. 79-92.
37. Lee, J. 1993. Design rationale capture and use. AI Magazine, 14(2):24-26.
38. Maarek, Y.S., Berry, D.M., and Kaiser, G.E. 1991. An information retrieval approach for automatically constructing software libraries. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(8):800-813.
39. Maclean, A., Bellotti, V., Young, R., and Moran, T. 1991. Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3-4):201-251.
40. Maiden, N.A. and Sutcliffe, A.G. 1992. Exploiting reusable specifications through analogy. Communications of the ACM, 35(4):55-64.
41. Neighbors, J. 1984. The Draco approach to constructing software from reusable components. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10:564-573.
42. Norman, R. and Nunamaker, J. 1989. CASE Productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals. Communications of the ACM, 32(9):1102-1108.
43. Poltrock, S.E. and Grudin, J. 1994. Organizational obstacles to interface design and development: Two participant observer studies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1):52-80.
44. Potts, C. 1993. Software-engineering research revisited. IEEE Software, 10(5):19-28.
45. Prieto-Díaz, R. 1991. Implementing faceted classification for software reuse. Communications of the ACM, 35(5).
46. Prieto-Díaz, R. and Arango, G. 1991. Domain Analysis and Software Systems Modeling, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamos, CA.
47. Ramanathan, J. and Sarkar, S. 1988. Providing customized assistance for software lifecycle approaches. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(6):749-757.
48. Ramesh, B. and Dahr, V. 1994. Representing and maintaining process knowledge for large-scale systems development. IEEE Expert, 9(2):54-59.
49. Rich, C.H. and Waters, R.C. 1988. Automatic programming: Myths and prospects. Computer, 21(8):40-51.
50. Rieman, J. 1993. The diary study: A workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. INTERCHI'93 Conference Proceedings, Amsterdam, pp. 321-326.
51. Simos, M.A. 1988. The domain-oriented software life cycle: Towards an extended process model for reusability. In Software Reuse: Emerging Technology, W. Tracz (Ed.), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamos, CA, pp. 354-363.
52. STARS, 1992. Informal Technical Report for Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS). Electronic Systems Division, Report #STARS-UC-05159/001/00, USAF.
53. Terveen, L.G., Selfridge, P.G., and Long, M.D. 1993. From 'Folklore' to living design memory. In Proceedings InterCHI'93. Amsterdam, pp. 15-22.
54. Terveen, L.G., Selfridge, P.G., and Long, M.D. 1995. Living design memory - Framework, implementation, lessons learned. Human-Computer Interaction, 10(1):1-37.
55. Urban, J.E. and Bobbie, P.O. 1994. Software productivity: Through undergraduate software engineering and CASE tools. In The Impact of CASE Technology on Software Processes, D.E. Cooke (Ed.), World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
56. Vesssy, I., Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Tractinsky, N. 1992. Evaluation of vendor products: CASE tools as methodology companies. Communications of the ACM, 35(4):90-105.
57. Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G.R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1):57-91.
58. Yourdon, E. 1992. Decline & Fall of the American Programmer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yourdon Press/Prentice Hall.