Control of flowering time in plants

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 480-487

  Amasino, Richard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HIGHER PLANT; NONHUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0030217952     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80071-2     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. 1. Zeevaart JAD: Photoperiodic induction, the floral stimulus and flower-promoting substances. In Light and the Flowering Process. Edited by Vince-Prue D, Thomas B, Cockshull KE. Orlando: Academic Press; 1984:137-142.
2. 2. Lang A, Chailakhyan MK, Frolova IA: Promotion and inhibition of flower formation in a day-neutral plant in grafts with a short-day and a long-day plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977, 74:2412-2416.
3. 3. McDaniel CN, Hartnett LK, Sangey KA: Regulation of node number in day-neutral Nicotiana tabacum: a factor in plant size. Plant J 1996, 9:55-61. This paper describes the results of extensive grafting studies using varieties of tobacco that differ in flowering time. The variation in flowering time is caused both by differences in the strength of floral signals and the receptivity of the meristem to those signals.
4. 4. Beveridge CA, Murfet IC: Flowering in Pisum: the gigas mutant is deficient in the floral stimulus. Physiol Plant 1996, in press. A comprehensive set of grafting experiments leads to the conclusion that the GIGAS gene of the pea is involved in the production of a translocatable promoter of flowering.
5. 5. Ishioka N, Tanimoto S, Harada H: Flower-inducing activity of phloem exudates from Pharbitis cotyledons exposed to various photoperiods. Plant Cell Physiol 1991, 32:921-924.
6. 6. Kozaki A, Takeba G, Tanaka O: A polypeptide that induces flowering in Lemna paucicostata at a very low concentration. Plant Physiol 1991, 95:1288-1290.
7. 7. Nakanishi F, Kusumi T, Inoue Y, Fujii T: Dihydrokaempferol glucoside from cotyledons promotes flowering in Pharbitis nil. Plant Cell Physiol 1995, 36:1303-1309.
8. 8. Lang A: Physiology of flower initiation. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol 15 (part 1). Edited by Ruhland W. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1965:1371-1536.
9. 9. Metzger JD: Localization of the site of perception of thermoinductive temperatures in Thlaspi arnense L. Plant Physiol 1988, 88:424-428.
10. 10. Burn JE, Bagnall DJ, Metzger JD, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ: DNA methylation, vernalization, and the initiation of flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:287-291.
11. 11. Garner WW, Allard HA: Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. J Agric Res 1920, 18:506-553.
12. 12. Martinez-Zapater JM, Coupland G, Dean C, Koornneef M: The transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. In Arabidopsis. Edited by Meyerowitz E, Somervilie CR. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1994:403-433.
13. 13. Koornneef M, Hanhart CJ, Van der Veen JH: A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 1991, 229:57-66.
14. 14. Lee I, Aukerman MJ, Gore SL, Lohman KN, Michaels SD, Weaver LM, John MC, Feldmann KA, Amasino RM: Isolation of luminidependens - a gene involved in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1994, 6:75-83.
15. 15. Weigel D: The genetics of flower development: from floral induction to ovule morphogenesis. Annu Rev Genet 1995, 29:19-39.
16. 16. Lee I, Amasino RM: Effect of vernalization, photoperiod and light quality on the flowering phenotype of Arabidopsis plants containing the FRIGIDA gene. Plant Physiol 1995, 108:157-162. This paper demonstrates that the late-flowering effects of FRIGIDA are fully reversed by moderate length cold treatments (vernalization) in both long and short days but that the delay of flowering caused by growth in short days cannot be fully overcome even by long periods of vernalization.
17. 17. Chandler J, Dean C: Factors influencing the vernalization response and flowering time of late flowering mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. J Exp Botany 1994, 45:1279-1288.
18. 18. Martinez-Zapater JM, Jarillo JA, Cruz-Alvarez M, Roldan M, Salinas J: Arabidopsis late-flowering fve mutants are affected in both vegetative and reproductive development. Plant J 1995, 7:543-551. This paper presents a thorough characterization of the effects of fve mutations and shows that the effects of these mutations are additive to the effects of short days. The reversal of the fve phenotype by vernalization is discussed.
19. 19. Wilson A, Dean C: Analysis of the molecular basis of vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Semin Dev Biol 1996, in press. This paper describes recent developments in two areas: the cloning of FCA, a gene in the autonomous flowering pathway encoding a protein that resembles RNA-binding proteins, and the isolation of mutants in the vernalization pathway.
20. 20. Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R, Coupland G: The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 1995, 80:847-857. The cloning of CONSTANS, a gene involved in the promotion of flowering, is described in addition to the phenotypes of double mutants of constans and mutations in other genes that influence flowering and meristem identity. The results are consistent with CONSTANS acting in the photoperiodic pathway to floral induction.
21. 21. Wilson RN, Heckman JW, Somerville CR: Gibberellin is required for flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under short days. Plant Physiol 1992, 100:403-408.
22. 22. Eimert K, Wang SM, Lue WL, Chen JC: Monogenic recessive mutations causing both late floral initiation and excess starch accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1995, 7:1703-1712. This paper shows that certain mutations that delay flowering also affect starch metabolism suggesting a link between carbohydrate supply/translocation and flowering.
23. 23. Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P: Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1147-1155.
24. 24. Clarke JH, Dean C: Mapping FRI, a locus controlling flowering time and vernalization response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 1994, 242:81-89.
25. 25. Burn JE, Smyth DR, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES: Genes conferring late flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetica 1993, 90:147-155.
26. 26. Napp-Zinn K: On the genetical basis of vernalization requirement in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. In La Physiologie de la Floraison. Edited by Champagnat P, Jaques R. Paris: Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); 1979:217-220.
27. 27. Lee I, Bleecker A, Amasino R: Analysis of naturally occurring late flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 1993, 237:171-176.
28. 28. Lee I, Michaels SD, Masshardt AS, Amasino RM: The late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and LUMINIDEPENDENS is suppressed in the Landsberg erecta strain of Arabidopsis. Plant J 1994, 6:903-909.
29. 29. Koornneef M, Blankestijn-de Vries H, Hanhart C, Soppe W, Peeters T: The phenotype of some late-flowering mutants is enhanced by a locus on chromosome 5 that is not effective in the Landsberg erecta wild-type. Plant J 1994, 6:911-919.
30. 30. Sanda S, Amasino RM: Analysis of flowering time in ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Hered 1996, in press.
31. 31. Bai S, Sung ZR: The role of EMF1 in regulating the vegetative and reproductive transition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Am J Botany 1995, 82:1095-1103. This paper presents an extensive analysis of the EMF1 phenotype and shows that the shoot apical meristem structure is altered at the earliest stages observable during embryo development.
32. 32. Yang C-H, Chen L-J, Sung ZR: Genetic regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis: role of the EMF genes. Dev Biol 1995, 169:421-435. This paper contains a further analysis of the emf1 and emf2 mutant phenotypes and presents double mutant analyses which show that emf mutants are epistatic to mutations that delay flowering.
33. 33. Jacobsen SE, Olszewski NE: Mutations at the SPINDLY locus of Arabidopsis alter gibberellin signal transduction. Plant Cell 1993, 5:887-896.
34. 34. Halliday KJ, Devlin PF, Whitelam GC, Hanhart CJ, Koornneef M: The ELONGATED gene of Arabidopsis acts independently of light and gibberellins in the control of elongation growth. Plant J 1996, 9:305-312. This paper describes the isolation of a mutant that shows excessive cell elongation and early flowering. The mutation identifies a gene common to all elongation and flowering pathways, both of which are affected by light and gibberellins.
35. 35. McNellis TW, Von Arnim AG, Araki T, Komeda Y, Misera S, Deng XW: Genetic and molecular analysis of an allelic series of cop1 mutants suggests functional roles for the multiple protein domains. Plant Cell 1994, 6:487-500.
36. 36. Hicks KA, Sundas A, Meeks-Wagner DR: Arabidopsis early-flowering mutants reveal multiple levels of regulation in the vegetative-to-floral transition. Semin Dev Biol 1996, in press. This paper provides a thorough review of early flowering mutants of Arabidopsis and discusses the early flowering 3 mutation which provides a link between the control of flowering time and circadian rhythms.
37. 37. Simon R, Coupland G: Arabidopsis genes that regulate flowering time in response to day-length. Semin Dev Biol 1996, in press. This paper provides a review of the role of CONSTANS in flowering and describes the extreme early flowering of the early short days 4 mutant.
38. 38. Zagotta MT, Shannon S, Jacobs C, Meeks-Wagner DR: Early-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Aust J Plant Physiol 1992, 19:411-418.
39. 39. Shannon S, Meeks-Wagner DR: A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 1991, 3:877-892.
40. 40. Shannon S, Meeks-Wagner DR: Genetic interactions that regulate inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1993, 5:639-655.
41. 41. Bradley D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Rothstein S, Coen E: Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 1996, 379:791-797. The cloning of CEN is described. The results of analyzing expression of meristem identity genes in wild-type and CEN mutants plus the analysis of the pattern of CEN expression provide the foundation for a model of the similarities and differences between determinate and indeterminate inflorescences.
42. 42. Vince-Prue D: The duration of light and photoperiod responses. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Edited by Kendrick RE, Kronenberg GHM. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1994:447-490.
43. 43. Whitelam GC, Harberd NP: Action and function of phytochrome family members revealed through the study of mutant and transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ 1994, 17:615-625.
44. 44. Koornneef M, Hanhart C, Van Loenen-Martinet P, Devries HB: The effect of daylength on the transition to flowering in phytochrome-deficient, late-flowering and double mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 1995, 95:260-266. This paper shows that phytochrome B and hy2 mutants in Arabidopsis exhibit a photoperiod response. Double and triple mutant analyses show that phytochrome deficiency causes early flowering of many late-flowering mutants. An interesting model showing the complex interactions between phytochrome, daylength and flowering time genes is presented.
45. 45. Childs KL, Cordonnier-Pratt MM, Pratt LH, Morgan PW: Genetic regulation of development in Sorghum bicolor VII. ma3 flowering mutant lacks a phytochrome that predominates in green tissue. Plant Physiol 1992, 99:765-770.
46. 46. Weller JL, Nagatani A, Kendrick RE, Murfet IC, Reid JB: New lv mutants of pea are deficient in phytochrome B. Plant Physiol 1995, 108:525-532. This paper demonstrates that certain lv alleles lack any detectable phytochrome B and that the early, day-neutral flowering of the lv mutant described in [47] is a result of a type II phytochrome deficiency.
47. 47. Weller JL, Reid JB: Photoperiodism and photocontrol of stem elongation in 2 photomorphogenic mutants of Pisum sativum L. Planta 1993, 189:15-23.
48. 48. Clack T, Mathews S, Sharrock RA: The phytochrome apoprotein family in Arabidopsis is encoded by five genes: the sequences and expression of PHY D and PHY E. Plant Mol Biol 1994, 25:413-427.
49. 49. Bagnall DJ, King RW, Whitelam GC, Boylan MT, Wagner D, Quail PH: Flowering responses to altered expression of phytochrome in mutants and transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. Plant Physiol 1995, 108:1495-1503. This paper compares the flowering responses of wild-type, phytochrome mutants and transgenic plants that overexpress a type I or type II phytochrome. One intriguing result was that overexpression of PHYA (a type I phytochrome) results in early flowering that is almost insensitive to daylength.
50. 50. Halliday KJ, Koornneef M, Whitelam GC: Phytochrome B and at least one other phytochrome mediate the accelerated flowering response of Arabidopsis thaliana L to low red/far-red ratio. Plant Physiol 1994, 104:1311-1315.
51. 51. Reed JW, Nagatani A, Elich TD, Pagan M, Chory J: Phytochrome A and phytochrome B have overlapping but distinct functions in Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol 1994, 104:1139-1149.
52. 52. Johnson E, Bradley M, Harberd NR Whitelam GC: Photoresponses of light-grown phyA mutants of Arabidopsis - phytochrome A is required for the perception of daylength extensions. Plant Physiol 1994, 105:141-149.
53. 53. King R, Bagnall D: Photo receptors and the photoperiodic response controlling flowering of Arabidopsis. Semin Dev Biol 1996, in press. This paper reviews the role of phytochrome as well as blue light photoreceptors on the flowering of Arabidopsis. Along with [55•], this study shows that a blue light receptor mutant (hy4) flowers later than the wild-type in non-inductive short days.
54. 54. Eskins K: Light-quality effects on Arabidopsis development. Red, blue and far-red regulation of flowering and morphology. Physiol Plant 1992, 86:439-444.
55. 55. Mozley D, Thomas B: Developmental and photobiological factors affecting photoperiodic induction in Arabidopsis thaliana Heynh. Landsberg erecta. J Exp Botany 1995, 46:173-179. This paper along with [56] demonstrates that Arabidopsis can initiate flowering in response to a single inductive photoperiod and provides a thorough analysis of developmental changes in photoperiod sensitivity.
56. 56. Hempel FD, Feldman LJ: Bi-directional inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana - acropetal initiation of flowers and basipetal initiation of paraclades. Planta 1994, 192:276-286.
57. 57. Hempel FD, Feldman LJ: Specification of chimeric flowering shoots in wild-type Arabidopsis. Plant J 1995, 8:725-731. This paper describes the formation from primordia of structures that contain both flower and shoot characteristics. One interesting feature of these chimeric structures is that the side furthest from the apical meristem formed the floral structures, suggesting that a signal from below the apical mersitem can directly induce flower formation in a primordium.
58. 58. Battey NH, Lyndon RF: Reversion of flowering. Bot Rev 1990, 06:162-189.
59. 59. Bradley D, Carpenter R, Elliott R, Simon R, Romero J, Hantke S, Doyle S, Mooney M, Luo D, Mcsteen P et al.: Gene regulation of flowering. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 1993, 339:193-197.
60. 60. Kelly A, Bonnlander MB, Meeks-Wagner DR: NFL, the tobacco homolog of Leafy and Floricaula, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems. Plant Cell 1995, 7:225-234. The authors describe the isolation and expression patterns of the tobacco homolog of LEAFY and Floricaula NFL. Unlike LEAFY and Floricaula, which are only found in floral meristems, NFL 1 and 2 are expressed in the vegetative meristem. Perhaps this difference in expression pattern contributes to the determinate growth pattern of inflorescence development in tobacco.
61. 61. Weigel D, Alvarez J, Smyth DR, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM: LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 1992, 69:843-859.
62. 62. Weigel D, Nilsson O: A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 1995, 377:495-500. See annotation [63••].
63. 63. Mandel MA, Yanofsky MF: A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature 1995, 377:522-524. These two papers [62••,63••] examine the effects of constitutive expres-sion of LEAFY and APETALA1. In Arabidopsis, constitutive expression of both genes leads to earlier flowering and the formation of terminal flowers showing that floral induction pathways can be bypassed to some extent by expression of these genes and that their lack of expression in the shoot apical meristem allows indeterminate growth. In aspen, LEAFY overexpression reduces flowering time from many years to a few months.