The development of the final approach spacing tool (FAST): A cooperative controller-engineer design approach

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 1161-1168

  Lee, K K ^a   Davis, T J ^b  

^a Sterling Software   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Air traffic control; Automation; Human factors; Interface; Simulation

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; AIRCRAFT; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION PERSONNEL; USER INTERFACES;

CONTROLLER ACCEPTANCE RATING SCALE; COOPERATIVE CONTROLLER ENGINEER DESIGN APPROACH; FINAL APPROACH SPACING TOOL;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 0030217062     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0967-0661(96)00116-5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cooper, G.E. and R.P. Harper (1969). The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. NASA TN D-5153. Washington, D.C.
2. Credeur, L., W.R. Capron, G.W. Lohr, D.J. Crawford, D.A. Tang and W.G. Rodgers (1993). Final-Approach Spacing Aids (FASA) Evaluation for Terminal-Area, Time-Based Air Traffic Control, NASA TP-3399.
3. Davis, T.J., H. Erzberger, S.M. Green and W. Nedell (1991). Design and evaluation of an air traffic control final approach spacing tool, J. of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 14, 848-854.
4. Davis, T.J., K.J. Krzeczowski and C. Bergh (1994). The final approach spacing tool, In: Proceedings of the 13th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace-Aerospace Control '94, Palo Alto, California, pp. 70-76.
5. Erzberger, H., T.J. Davis and S.M. Green (1993). Design of Center-TRACON automation system. In: Proceedings of the AGARD Guidance and Control Panel 56th Symposium on Machine Intelligence in Air Traffic Management, Berlin, Germany, 1993, pp. 11-1-11-12.
6. Garcia, J. (1990). MAESTRO - A metering and spacing tool. In: Proceedings of the 1990 American Control Conference, San Diego, California, pp. 501-507.
7. Harper, R.P. and G.E. Cooper (1986). Handling qualities and pilot evaluation. J. of Guidance, 9, 515-529.
8. Harwood, K. and B.D. Sanford (1993). Evaluation in context: ATC automation in the field. In: Human factors certification of advanced aviation technologies (J.A. Wise, V.D. Hopkin, and P. Stager, Eds.), pp. 247-262. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press, Daytona Beach FL.
9. Lee, K.K., W.S. Pawlak, B.D. Sanford and R.A. Slattery (1995). Improved navigational technology and air traffic control: A description of controller coordination and workload. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
10. Martin, D.A. and F.M. Willet (1968). Development and application of a terminal spacing system. Federal Aviation Administration, Kept. NA-68-25 (RD-68-16), Aug. 1968.
11. Sanford, B.D., K. Harwood and K.K. Lee (1995). Tailoring advanced technologies for air traffic control: The importance of the development process. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
12. Slattery, R.A., K.K. Lee and B.D. Sanford (1995). Effects of ATC automation on precision approaches to closely spaced parallel runways. In: Proceedings of the 1995 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, August, 1995.
13. Small, D. (1994). Lessons learned: Human factors in the AAS procurement. MP 94W000088. MITRE, McLean, Virginia.
14. Völckers, U. (1990). Arrival planning and sequencing with COMPAS-OP at the Frankfurt ATC-Center. In: Proceedings of the 1990 American Control Conference, San Diego, California, pp. 496-501.