Dynamic analysis of the ultrasonic machining process

Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 376-381

  Wang, Z Y ^a   Rajurkar, K P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABRASIVES; DYNAMICS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STRESSES; THREE DIMENSIONAL; ULTRASONIC MACHINE TOOLS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

DYNAMIC CONTACT FORCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ULTRASONIC MACHINING;

MACHINING;

EID: 0030216267     PISSN: 10871357     EISSN: 15288935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2831039     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dariow, M. S., 1989. -Balancing of High-speed Machinery,— Springer-Verlag.
2. Dikushin, V. I., and Barke, V. N., 1958, -Ultrasonic Erosion and its Dependence on the Vibrational Characteristics of the Tool,— Stanki i Inslr., No 5, 10. pp. 1058-1066.
3. Ooetze, D., 1956. -Effect of Vibration Amplitude, Frequency and Composition of the Abrasive Slurry on the Rate of Ultrasonic Machining in Kctos Tool Steel.— Journal of the Acoustics Society of America. Vol. 28. pp. 1053-1059.
4. Goetze, D., 1957, -Effect of Pressure Between Tool. Tip and Workpiece on the Rate of Ultrasonic machining in Ketos Tool Steel,— Journal fo the Acoustic Society of America, Vol. 29. pp. 426-430.
5. Kainth, G. S., Nandy, A., and Singh, K., 1979, -On the Mechanics of Material Removal in Ultrasonic Machining,— Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., Vol. 19, pp 33-41.
6. Kamoun, H., Houbt, M., Kremcr, D., Lccoco, B., and Coffignal, G., 1993. -Modelling the Material Removal in Stationary Mode for Ultrasonic Contour Machining.— ASME. Winter Annual Meeting, pp. 759-770.
7. Ncppiras, E. A., 1956, “Repon on Ultrasonic Machining,” Metalwork Product. Vol. 100. pp. 1283-1300.
8. Ncppiras, E. A., and Foskct, R. D., 1957, -Ultraschall-Materialbcarbcitung.—’ Philips’ Tech. Rundschau. Vol. 19. pp. 37-39.
9. Pei, Z. J., Prabhakar, D., and Ferreira, P. M., 1993, “A Mechanistic Approach to the Prediction of Material Removal Rates in Rotary Ultrasonic Machining.*’ ASME. Winter Annual Meeting, pp. 771-784.
10. Prabhakar, D., Ferreira, P. M., and Hasclkorn, M., 1992, -An Experimental Investigation of Matenal Removal Rates in Rotary Ultrasonic Machining,—’ Transactions of NAMRI/SME, Vol. 20. pp. 211-218.
11. Prabhakar, D., Pei, Z. J., Ferreira, P. M., and Haselkom, M., 1993. -A theoretical model for predicting matenal removal rates in rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramics.— Transactions of NAMRI/SME. Vol. 21. pp. 167-172.
12. Roxnberg, L. D., Kazantsev, V. F., Makarov, L. O., and Yakhimovich, D. F., 1964, -’Ultrasonic Cutting,— Consultants Bureau. New York.
13. Saha, J., Bhattacharyya, A., and Mishra, P. K., 1988. -Estimation of Material Removal in USNf Process-A Theoretical and Rxperiment.il Study,— Thr 27th MTPR Coherence, pp. 275-279.
14. Shaw, M. C, 1956. -Ultrasonic Grinding.— Annals of CIRP. Vol. 5. pp. 25-53.
15. Tsai, Y. M., and Kolsky, H., 1968, -Stress Waves Produced by Impact on the Surface of a Plastic Medium.— J. Franklin Inst., Vol. 285. pp. 204-221.
16. Tsai, Y. M., 1974. -Dynamic contact stresses produced by impact in elastic plates of finite thickness.— Pweeding of the Symposium of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (IUTAM), pp. 206-220.
17. Tsai, Y. M., 1969. -Stress Distribution in Elastic and Viscoclastic Plates Subjected to Symmetrical Rigid Indentations.— J. Appl. Math., Vol. 27. pp. 371-380.