Image reconstruction using a generalized natural pixel basis

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

Volumn 43, Issue 4 PART 1, 1996, Pages 2306-2319

  Hsieh, Yu Lung ^a   Gullberg, Grant T ^a   Zeng, Gengsheng L ^a   Huesinan, Ronald H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; VECTORS;

BACKPROJECTION; GENERALIZED NATURAL PIXEL BASIS; IMAGING EQUATION; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COM; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 0030214053     PISSN: 00189499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/23.531896     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. G. L. Zeng and G. T. Gullberg. An iterative reconstruction algorithm with natural pixel basis, J Nucl. Med., vol. 34, p. 19, 1993.
2. G. T. Gullberg and G. L. Zeng, A reconstruction algorithm using singular value decomposition of a discrete representation of the exponential Radon transform using natural pixels, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 41, pp. 2812-2819, 1994.
3. [31 G. T. Gullberg, Y-L. Hsieh and G. L. Zeng, An SVD reconstruction algorithm using a natural pixel representation of the attenuated Radon transform, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 43, pp. 295-303, 1996.
4. F. Natlerer, Efficient implementation of optimal algorithms in computerized tomography, Math. Meths, in Appl. Sci., vol. 2., pp. 545-555, 1980.
5. M. H. Buonocore, W. R. Brody, and A. Macovski, A natural pixel decomposition for two-dimensional image reconstruction, IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-28, pp. 69-78, 1981.
6. F. Natterer, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1986, pp. 144-150 and 156-157.
7. L. Garnero, J.-P. Hugonin, and N. De Beaucoudrey, Limited-angle tomographic imaging using a constrained natural-pixel decomposition, Optica Acta, vol. 33, pp. 659-671,1986.
8. J. R. Baker, Spatially variant tomographic imaging: Estimation, identification, and optimization, University of California at Berkeley, Ph.D. dissertation, 1991.
9. J. R. Baker, T. F. Budinger, and R. H. Huesman, Generalized approached to inverse problems in tomography: Image reconstruction for spatially variant systems using natural pixels, Critical Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 20, pp. 47-71, 1992.
10. Mickey Bhatia, Wavelet transform-based multiresolution techniques for tomographic reconstruction and detection, MIT, Ph.D. dissertation, 1994, pp. 54-56.
11. M. Bertero, C. De Mol, and E. R. Pike, Linear inverse problems with discrete data. I: General formulation and singular system analysis, Inverse Problems, vol. 1, pp. 301-330, 1985.
12. M. Bertero, C. De Mol, and E. R. Pike, Linear inverse problems with discrete data: IT. Stability and regularization, Inverse Problems, vol. 4, pp. 573-594, 1988.
13. R. H. Huesman, G. T. Gullberg, W. L. Greenberg, and T. F. Budinger, Users Manual-Doner Algorithms for Reconstruction Tomography, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Publication PUB-214, 1977.
14. F. Noo, C. Bernard, F. X. Litt, P. Marchot, A comparison between filtered backprojection algorithm and direct algebraic method in fan beam C. T., IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., vol. 51, no. 2, 1996 (in press).