Expression of Hoxb Genes in the Developing Mouse Foregut and Lung

American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 163-171

  Bogue, Clifford W ^a   Lou, Lily J ^a   Vasavada, Hema ^a   Wilson, Christine M ^a   Jacobs, Harris C ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HOMEOBOX; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LUNG; MALE; MESODERM; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; RNA PROBE;

ANIMALS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, HOMEOBOX; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LUNG; MALE; MESODERM; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; PREGNANCY; RNA PROBES;

EID: 0030213219     PISSN: 10441549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.15.2.8703472     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Spooner, B. S., and N. K. Wessels. 1970. Mammalian lung development: interactions in primordium formation and bronchial morphogenesis. J. Exp. Zool. 175:445-454.
2. Ten Have-Opbroek, A. A. W. 1991. Lung development in the mouse embryo. Exp. Lung. Res. 17:111-130.
3. Wessells, N. K. 1970. Mammalian lung development: interactions in formation and morphogenesis of tracheal buds. J. Exp. Zool. 175:455-466.
4. Ten Have-Opbroek, A. A. W. 1981. The development of the lung in mammals: an analysis of concepts and findings. Am. J. Anat. 162:201-219.
5. Ten Have-Opbroek, A. A. W. 1979. Immunological study of lung development in the mouse embryo. II. First appearance of the great alveolar cell, as shown by immunofluorescence microscopy. Dev. Biol. 69:408-423.
6. Hilfer, S. R., R. M. Rayner, and J. W. Brown. 1985. Mesenchymal control of branching pattern in the fetal mouse lung. Tissue Cell 17:523-538.
7. Sibilia, M., and E. F. Wagner. 1995. Strain-dependent epithelial defects in mice lacking the EGF receptor. Science 269:234-238.
8. Threadgill, D. W., A. A. Dlugosz, L. A. Hansen, T. Tennenbaum, U. Lichti, D. Yee, C. LaMantia, T. Mourton, K. Herrup, and R. C. Harris, 1995. Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science 269:230-234.
9. Warburton, D., R. Seth, L. Shum, P. G. Horcher, F. L. Hall, Z. Werb, and H. C. Slavkin. 1992. Epigenetic role of epidermal growth factor expression and signaling in embryonic mouse lung morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 149:123-133.
10. Moens, C. B., A. B. Aurbach, R. A. Conlon, A. L. Joyner, and J. Rossant. 1992. A targeted mutation reveals a role for N-myc in branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Genes Dev. 6:691-704.
11. Brauker, J. H., M. S. Trautman, and M. Bernfield. 1991. Syndecan, a cell surface proteoglycan, exhibits a molecular polymorphism during lung development. Dev. Biol. 147:285-292.
12. Schuger, L., K. S. O'Shea, J. Rheinheimer, and J. Varani. 1990. Laminin in lung development: effects of anti-laminin antibody in murine lung morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 137:26-32.
13. Schuger, L., A. P. N. Skubitz, K. S. O'Shea, J. F. Chang, and J. Varani. 1991. Identification of laminin domains involved in branching morphogenesis: effects of anti-laminin monoclonal antibodies on mouse embryonic lung development. Dev. Biol. 146:531-541.
14. Hirai, Y., K. Takebe, M. Takashina, M. Kobayash, and M. Takeichi. 1992. Epimorphin: a mesenchymal protein essential for epithelial morphogenesis. Cell 69:471-481.
15. Bogue, C. W., I. Gross, H. Vasavada, D. W. Dynia, C. M. Wilson, and H. C. Jacobs. 1994. Identification of Hox genes in newborn lung and the effects of gestational age and retinoic acid on their expression. Am. J. Physiol. (Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.) 266:L448-L454.
16. Rubock, M. J., Z. Larin, M. Cook, N. Papalopulu, R. Krumlauf, and H. Lehrach. 1990. A yeast artificial chromosome containing the mouse homeobox cluster Hox-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4751-4755.
17. Sham, M. H., P. Hunt, S. Nonchev, N. Papalopulu, A. Graham, E. Boncinelli, and R. Krumlauf. 1992. Analysis of the murine Hox-2.7 gene: conserved alternative transcripts with differential distributions in the nervous system and the potential for shared regulatory regions. EMBO J. 11:1825-1836.
18. Graham, A., N. Papalopulu, J. Lorimer, J. H. McVey, E. G. D. Tuddenham, and R. Krumlauf. 1988. Characterization of a murine homeo box gene, Hox-2.6, related to the Drosophila Deformed gene. Genes Dev. 2:1424-1438.
19. Krumlauf, R., P. W. H. Holland, J. H. McVey, and B. L. M. Hogan. 1987. Developmental and spatial patterns of expression of the mouse homeobox gene, Hox 2.1. Development 99:603-617.
20. Gaunt, S. J., R. Krumlauf, and D. Duboule. 1989. Mouse homeo-genes within a subfamily, Hox-1.4, -2.6 and -5.1, display similar anteroposterior domains of expression in the embryo, but show stage- and tissue-dependent differences in their regulation. Development 107:131-141.
21. Hunt, P., M. Gulisano, M. Cook, M.-H. Sham, A. Faiella, D. Wilkinson, E. Boncinelli, and R. Krumlauf. 1991. A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature (London) 353:861-864.
22. Wilkinson, D. G. 1992. Whole mount in situ hybridization of vertebrate embryos. In In Situ Hybridization: A Practical Approach, D. G. Wilkinson, editor. IRL Press, London. 75-83.
23. Murphy, P., and R. E. Hill. 1991. Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111:61-74.
24. Frohman, M. A., M. Boyle, and G. R. Martin. 1990. Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene: analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm. Development 110:589-607.
25. Hunt, P., D. Wilkinson, and R. Krumlauf. 1991. Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct sub populations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest. Development 112:43-50.
26. McGinnis, W., and R. Krumlauf. 1992. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283-302.
27. Kessel, M., and P. Gruss. 1991. Homeotic transformations of murine vertebrae and concomitant alteration of Hox codes induced by retinoic acid. Cell 67:89-104.
28. Roberts, D. J., R. L. Johnson, A. C. Burke, C. E. Nelson, B. A. Morgan, and C. Tabin. 1995. Sonic hedgehog is an endodermal signal inducing BMP-4 and Hox genes during induction and regionalization of the chick hindgut. Development 121:3163-3174.
29. Yokouchi, Y., J.-I. Sakayama, and A. Kuroiwa. 1995. Coordinated expression of Abd-B subfamily genes of the Hoxa cluster in the developing digestive tract of chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 169:76-89.
30. Conlon, R. A., and J. Rossant. 1992. Exogenous retinoic acid rapidly induces anterior ectopic expression of murine Hox-2 genes in vivo. Development 116:357-368.
31. Holland, P. W. H., and B. L. M. Hogan. 1988. Spatially restricted patterns of expression of the homeobox-containing gene Hox 2.1 during mouse embryogenesis. Development 102:159-174.
32. Kuratani, S. C., and N. A. Wall. 1992. Expression of Hox 2.1 protein in restricted populations of neural crest cells and pharyngeal ectoderm. Dev. Dyn. 195:15-28.
33. Izpisua-Belmonte, J.-C., C. Tickle, P. Dolle, L. Wolpert, and D. Duboule. 1991. Expression of the homeobox Hox-4 genes and the specification of position in chick wing development. Nature (London) 350:585-589.
34. Dolle, P., J.-C. Izpisua-Belmonte. H. Falkenstein, A. Renucci, and D. Duboule. 1989. Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature (London) 342:767-772.
35. Morgan, B. A., J.-C. Izpisua-Belmonte, D. Duboule, and C. Tabin. 1992. Targeted misexpression of Hox-4.6 in the avian limb bud causes apparent homeotic transformations. Nature 358:236-239.
36. Chuong, C.-M., G. Oliver, S. A. Ting, B. Jegalian, H. M. Chen, and E. M. DeRobertis. 1990. Gradient of homeoproteins in developing feather buds. Development 110:1021-1030.
37. Chuong, C.-M. 1991. Position specific expression of homeoprotein gradients in different feather tracts. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 642:462-464.
38. Jeannotte, L., M. Lemieux, J. Charron, F. Poirier, and E. J. Robertson. 1993. Specification of axial identity in the mouse: role of the Hoxa-5 (Hox1.3) gene. Genes Dev. 7:2085-2096.
39. Jegalian, B. G., and E. M. D. Robertis. 1992. Homeotic transformations in the mouse induced by overexpression of a human Hox3.3 transgene. Cell 71:901-910.
40. Kaur, S., G. Singh, J. L. Stock, C. M. Schreiner, A. B. Kier, K. L. Yager, M. L. Mucenski, W. J. Scott, and S. S. Potter. 1992. Dominant mutation of the murine Hox2.2 gene results in developmental abnormalities. J. Exp. Zool. 264:323-336.
41. Le Mouellic, H., Y. Lallemand, and P. Brulet. 1992. Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene. Cell 69:251-264.
42. Lufkin, T., A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, M. Mark, and P. Chambon. 1991. Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66:1105-1119.
43. Chisaka, O., T. S. Musci, and M. R. Capecchi. 1992. Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Nature 355:516-520.
44. Balling, R., G. Mutter, P. Gruss, and M. Kessel. 1989. Craniofacial abnormalities induced by ectopic expression of the homeobox gene Hox-1.1 in transgenic mice. Cell 58:337-347.
45. Dolle, P., A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, T. Schimmang, B. Schuhbaur, P. Chambon, and D. Duboule. 1993. Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces localized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs. Cell 75:431-441.
46. Chisaka, O., and M. R. Capecchi. 1991. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature (London) 350:473-479.
47. McLain, K., C. Schreiner, K. L. Yager, J. L. Stock, and S. S. Potter. 1992. Ectopic expression of Hox-2.3 induces craniofacial and skeletal malformations in transgenic mice. Mech. Dev. 39:3-16.
48. Pollock, R. A., G. Jay, and C. J. Bieberich. 1992. Altering the boundaries of Hox3.1 expression: evidence for antipodal gene regulation. Cell 71: 911-923.
49. Wogelmuth, D. J., R. R. Behringer, M. P. Mostoller, R. L. Brinster, and R. D. Palmiter. 1989. Transgenic mice overexpressing the mouse homoeobox-containing gene Hox-1.4 exhibit abnormal gut development. Nature 337:464-467.
50. Taderera, J. V. 1967. Control of lung differentiation in vitro. Dev. Biol. 16:489-512.
51. Ekblom, P., M. Ekblom, L. Fecker, G. Klein, H.-Y. Zhang, Y. Kadoya, M.-L. Chu, U. Mayer, and R. Timpl. 1994. Role of mesenchymal nidogen for epithelial morphogenesis in vitro. Development 120:2003-2014.
52. Heine, U. I., E. F. Munoz, K. C. Flanders, A. B. Roberts, and M. B. Sporn. 1990. Colocalization of TGF-beta 1 and collagen I and III. fibronectin, and glycosaminoglycans during lung branching morphogenesis. Development 109:29-36.
53. Thomas, T., and M. Dziadek. 1994. Expression of collagen al(IV), laminin and nidogen genes in the embryonic mouse lung: implications for branching morphogenesis. Mech. Dev. 45:193-201.
54. Minoo, P., and R. J. King. 1994. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in lung development. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56:13-45.
55. Goomer, R. S., B. D. Holst, I. C. Wood, F. S. Jones, and G. M. Edelman. 1994. Regulation in vitro of an L-CAM enhancer by homeobox genes Hox D9 and HNF-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7985-7989.
56. Minowa, O., E. M. D. Robertis, and G. M. Edelman. 1993. Binding and transcriptional activation of the promoter for the neural cell adhesion molecule by HoxC6 (Hox-3.3). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6557-6561.
57. Jones, F. S., E. A. Prediger, D. A. Bittner, E. M. De Robertis, and G. M. Edelman. 1992. Cell adhesion molecule as targets for Hox genes: Neural cell adhesion molecule promoter activity is modulated by cotransfection with Hox-2.5 and -2.4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:2086-2090.
58. Jones, F. S., G. Chalepakis, P. Gruss, and G. M. Edelman. 1992. Activation of the cytotactin promoter by the homeobox-containing gene EVX-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:2091-2095.