Economic development and the university: A case study of a failed program

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 367-387

  Senter Jr , Richard ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030213213     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01730107     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Atkinson, R. D. (1991). Some states take the lead: Explaining the formation of state technology policies. Economic Development Quarterly 5(1): 33-44.
2. Averch, H. (1985). A Strategic Analysis of Science and Technology Policy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Baba, M. (1985). University innovation to promote economic growth and university/ industry relations. In P. Abetti, C. LeMaistre, and W. Wallace (eds.), Promoting Economic Growth Through Innovation: Proceedings: 1985 Conference on Industrial Science and Technological Innovation. Albany, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
4. Barke, R. (1986). Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
5. Bingham, R. D., and Bowen, W. M. (1994). The performance of state economic development programs: An impact evaluation. Policy Studies Journal 22(3): 501-513.
6. Bingham, R. D., and Mier, R. (eds.) (1993). Theories of Local Economic Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Bowie, N. E. (1994). University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
8. Crow, M. M., Emmert, M. A., and Jacobson, C. I. (1990) Government-supported industrial research institutes in the United States. Policy Studies Journal 19(1): 59-74.
9. Dasgupta, P., and Stoneman, P. (eds.). (1987). Economic Policy and Technological Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Feldman, M. (1994). The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly 8(1:) 67-76.
12. Feller, I. (1990). University-industry R & D relationships. In J. Schmandt and R. Wilson (eds.), Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology (pp. 313-343). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
13. Feller, I., and Anderson, G. (1994). A benefit-cost approach to the evaluation of state technology development programs. Economic Development Quarterly 8(2): 127-140.
14. Fosler, R. S. (ed.) (1988). The New Economic Role of American States. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Gupta, U. (1994). Hungry for funds, universities embrace technology transfer. Wall Street Journal LXXV (183): 1 +, Midwest edition, July 1, 1994.
16. Hyde, A. C. (ed.) (1992). Government Budgeting: Theory, Process, and Politics, 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
17. Inkster, I. (1991). Science and Technology in History - An Approach to Industrial Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18. Judd, D. R. (1988). The Politics of American Cities, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Harper-Collins Publishers.
19. Kassicieh, S. K., and Radosevich, H. R. (eds.). (1994). From Lab to Market. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.
20. Klausner, S. Z. (1992). Universities without contract research. In T. C. Halliday and M. Janowitz (eds.), Sociology and Its Publics (pp. 235-268). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Kostoff, R. (ed.) (1994). Special issue: Research impact assessment. Evaluation Review 18(1).
22. Lambright, W. H., and Teich, A. H. (1989). Science, technology and state economic development. Policy Studies Journal 18(1): 135-147.
23. Minnesota Office of Science and Technology (1988). State Technology Programs in the United States. St. Paul, MN: Office of Science and Technology, Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
24. Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology 82(2): 309-332.
25. Mowery, D. C., and Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Osborne, D. (1990a). Laboratories of Democracy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
27. Osborne, D. (1990b). Refining state technology programs. Issues in Science and Technology 6(4): 55-61.
28. Osborne, D., and Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.
29. Peterson, P. E. (1981). City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Portz, J. (1993). State economic development programs: The trials and tribulations of implementation. Economic Development Quarterly 7(2): 160-171.
31. Reese, L. (1993). Decision rules in local economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly 28(3): 501-513.
32. Robertson, D. B., and Judd, D. R (1989). The Development of American Public Policy: The Structure of Policy Restraint. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
33. Schlegel, K., and Weisburd, D. (eds.) (1992). White-Collar Crime Reconsidered. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
34. Schmandt, J., and Wilson, R. (eds.) (1987). Promoting High-Technology Industry. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35. Schmandt, J., and Wilson, R. (1990). Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
36. Senter, R. (1994). State government programs for science and technology and state economic growth: An exploratory analysis of Iowa, Massachusetts, and Arkansas. Applied Behavioral Science Review 2(2): 115-137.
37. Smilor, R. W., Kozmetsky, G., and Gibson, D. V. (eds.) (1988). Creating the Technopolis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
38. Smith, B. L. R. (1990). American Science Policy Since World War II. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
39. Sutherland, E. (1983). White Collar Crime. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.