Spatial control of a large pressurized heavy water reactor

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

Volumn 43, Issue 4 PART 2, 1996, Pages 2440-2453

  Tiwari, A P ^a   Bandyopadhyay, B ^a   Govindarajan, G ^b  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^b Lehrstuhl Für Elektrische Steuerung Und Regelung   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; LINEARIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL VARIABLES CONTROL; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; REACTOR CORES; STATE SPACE METHODS; XENON;

NEAR OPTIMAL LINEAR REGULATOR; PRESSURIZED HEAVY WATER REACTOR; SPATIAL OSCILLATIONS; SUBSYSTEM REGULATOR; XENON IODINE DYNAMICS;

PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS;

EID: 0030212758     PISSN: 00189499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/23.531794     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. W. M. Stacey Jr., Space Time Nuclear Reactor Kinetics. New York: Academic, 1969.
2. P. V. Kokotovic, R. E. O'Malley, and P. SannutiSingular perturbations and order reduction in control theory-An overview Aulomalica, vol. 12,pp. 123-132, 1976.
3. J. H. Chow and P. V. KokotovicA decomposition of near optimum regulators for systems with slow and fast modes IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. AC-21,pp. 701-705, 1976.
4. P. V. Kokotovic, II. K. Khalil, and J. O'Reilly, Singular Perburtation Methods in Control Analysis and Design. New York: Academic, 1986, pp. 47-156.
5. K. Asatani, T. Iwazumi, and Y. HattoriError estimation of prompt jump approximation by singular perturbation theory J. Nucl. Sei. and Tech., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 653-656, 1971.
6. N. Z. Cho and L. M. GrossmanOptimal control for xenon spatial oscillations in load follow of a nuclear reactor Nucl. Set. and Eng., vol. 83,pp. 136-148, 1983.
7. Y. H. Park and N. Z. ChoA compensator design controlling neutron flux distribution via observer theory Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 19,pp. 513-525, 1992.
8. P. B. Rcddy and P. SannutiOptimal control of a coupled-core nuclear reactor by a singular perturbation method IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. AC-20,pp. 766-769, Dec. 1975.
9. I. J. Duderstadt and L. J. Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1976.
10. N. K. GuptaNodal methods for three dimensional simulators Prog. Nucl. Energy, vol. 7,pp. 127-149, 1981.
11. B. R. Ivan, A. P. Tiwari, and R. K. PatilA real time nodal core model of 500 MWe PHWR in Proc. Workshop Computers in Real Time Appl., Kalpakkam, India, Dec. 1990.
12. K. O. Ott and D. A. MeneleyAccuracy of the quasistatic treatment of spatial reactor kinetics Nucl. Sei. Eng., vol. 64,pp. 582-592, 1977.
13. A. Hold and O. LupasReal time simulation of the transient behavior of local and global PWR core and plant parameters in Proc. ANS/ENS Int. Topical Meet. Advances in Mathematical Methods for the Solution of Nuclear Eng. Problems, Munich, Germany, Apr. 27-29, 1981.
14. Rajasthan Atomic Power Project-RAPP 3 &4, Detailed Project Rep., Bombay, India, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Feb. 1989.
15. E. Hinchley and G. KuglarOn-line control of the CANDU-PHW power distribution in IAEA Specialists' Meet. Spatial Control Problems, Studsvik, Sweden, Oct. 1974.
16. G. Syrcos and P. SannutiTransformation of physical models into singularly perturbed form inlFACSymp. Theory and Appl. Dig. Contr., New Delhi, India, 1982, pp. 15-21.
17. B. P. Demidovich and 1. A. Maron, Computational Mathematics. Moscow: Mir, 1973.
18. |18] F. R. Gantmacher, The Theory of Matrices. New York: Chelsea, 1960.
19. N. SudaOn controllability of neutron flux distribution .J. Nur. Sri. Tech., vol. 5, no. 6,pp. 271-278, June 1968.
20. H. Kwakarnaak and R. Sivan, Linear Optimal Control Systems. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1972.
21. C. T. Chen, Linear System Theory and Design. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1984.
22. J. KarppinenSpatial reactor control methods Nucl. Sei. and Eng., vol. 64,pp. 657-672, 1977.